Bender Andrea, Beller Sieghard
Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen.
Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;41(1):158-187. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12337. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
Mangarevan traditionally contained two numeration systems: a general one, which was highly regular, decimal, and extraordinarily extensive; and a specific one, which was restricted to specific objects, based on diverging counting units, and interspersed with binary steps. While most of these characteristics are shared by numeration systems in related languages in Oceania, the binary steps are unique. To account for these characteristics, this article draws on-and tries to integrate-insights from anthropology, archeology, linguistics, psychology, and cognitive science more generally. The analysis of mental arithmetic with these systems reveals that both types of systems entailed cognitive advantages and served important functions in the cultural context of their application. How these findings speak to more general questions revolving around the theoretical models and evolutionary trajectory of numerical cognition will be discussed in the .
一种是通用系统,高度规则、十进制且范围极其广泛;另一种是特定系统,仅限于特定对象,基于不同的计数单位,并穿插着二进制步骤。虽然大洋洲相关语言中的计数系统大多具有这些特征,但二进制步骤却是独一无二的。为了解释这些特征,本文借鉴并试图整合更广泛的人类学、考古学、语言学、心理学和认知科学的见解。对使用这些系统进行心算的分析表明,这两种类型的系统都具有认知优势,并在其应用的文化背景中发挥了重要作用。这些发现如何与围绕数字认知的理论模型和进化轨迹的更普遍问题相关联,将在本文中进行讨论。