Dufka Faustine L, Lansdown Drew A, Zhang Alan L, Allen Christina R, Ma C Benjamin, Feeley Brian T
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 500 Parnassus Ave, MU 320 W, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 500 Parnassus Ave, MU 320 W, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):460-4. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
Our purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the pre-operative detection of meniscus tears requiring operative intervention, and identify factors that determined accuracy of diagnosing meniscus tears, in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. A meniscus tear was classified as requiring treatment if it was debrided or repaired at the time of ACL reconstruction. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of pre-operative MRIs were determined for medial and lateral meniscus tears.
Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MRI were 0.90, 0.75, 0.58, and 0.95 for medial meniscus tears, respectively, and 0.67, 0.81, 0.65, and 0.82 for lateral meniscus tears. MRI-diagnosed medial meniscus tears were associated with a longer time interval between initial injury and imaging compared to ACL tears without concomitant meniscus injury on MRI (p=0.038). Vertical medial meniscus tears were less likely than other tear patterns to require treatment at the time of ACL reconstruction (p=0.03). MRI showed a higher diagnostic performance for lateral meniscus tears when surgery was performed within 30days of imaging.
This study demonstrates only moderate sensitivity and specificity of pre-operative MRI in the detection of meniscus tears requiring operative treatment in the setting of ACL injury. High rates of false diagnoses were observed, suggesting MRI may not be as accurate in predicting positive or negative meniscus findings at the time of ACL reconstruction as previously reported.
Level III.
我们的目的是评估磁共振成像(MRI)在术前检测需要手术干预的半月板撕裂方面的诊断性能,并确定在进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建时决定半月板撕裂诊断准确性的因素。
对接受初次ACL重建的患者进行回顾性研究。如果半月板撕裂在ACL重建时进行了清创或修复,则将其分类为需要治疗。确定术前MRI对内侧和外侧半月板撕裂的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。
MRI对内侧半月板撕裂的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为0.90、0.75、0.58和0.95,对外侧半月板撕裂的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为0.67、0.81、0.65和0.82。与MRI上无半月板损伤的ACL撕裂相比,MRI诊断的内侧半月板撕裂与初始损伤和成像之间的时间间隔更长(p=0.038)。垂直内侧半月板撕裂在ACL重建时需要治疗的可能性低于其他撕裂模式(p=0.03)。当在成像后30天内进行手术时,MRI对外侧半月板撕裂的诊断性能更高。
本研究表明,术前MRI在检测ACL损伤时需要手术治疗的半月板撕裂方面,敏感性和特异性仅为中等。观察到较高的误诊率,这表明MRI在预测ACL重建时半月板的阳性或阴性结果方面可能不如先前报道的准确。
III级。