Zhang Cen, Kasner Scott
Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA.
F1000Res. 2016 Feb 12;5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7384.1. eCollection 2016.
Despite many advances in our understanding of ischemic stroke, cryptogenic strokes (those that do not have a determined etiology) remain a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Previous classification approaches to cryptogenic stroke have led to inconsistent definitions, and evidence to determine optimal treatment is scarce. These limitations have prompted international efforts to redefine cryptogenic strokes, leading to more rigorous diagnostic criteria, outcome studies, and new clinical trials. Improvement in our ability to detect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke has strengthened the idea that these strokes are embolic in nature. Further, better understanding of acute biomarkers has helped to identify otherwise occult mechanisms. Together, these strategies will inform long-term outcomes and shape management.
尽管我们对缺血性中风的认识有了许多进展,但隐源性中风(即那些病因未明的中风)仍然是诊断和治疗上的挑战。以往对隐源性中风的分类方法导致定义不一致,且确定最佳治疗方案的证据稀缺。这些局限性促使国际上重新定义隐源性中风,从而产生了更严格的诊断标准、预后研究和新的临床试验。我们检测隐源性中风患者阵发性心房颤动能力的提高,强化了这些中风本质上是栓塞性的观点。此外,对急性生物标志物的更好理解有助于识别其他隐匿机制。这些策略共同将为长期预后提供信息并塑造治疗管理方式。