Neurochirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf.
Department of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):281-288. doi: 10.3171/2015.11.JNS15991. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
OBJECTIVE Methods of choice for neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring (IOM) within the infratentorial compartment mostly include early brainstem auditory evoked potentials, free-running electromyography, and direct cranial nerve (CN) stimulation. Long-tract monitoring with somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) is rarely used. This study investigated the incidence of IOM alterations during posterior fossa surgery stratified for lesion location. METHODS Standardized CN and SEP/MEP IOM was performed in 305 patients being treated for various posterior fossa pathologies. The IOM data were correlated with lesion locations and histopathological types as well as other possible confounding factors. RESULTS Alterations in IOM were observed in 158 of 305 cases (51.8%) (CN IOM alterations in 130 of 305 [42.6%], SEP/MEP IOM alterations in 43 of 305 [14.0%]). In 15 cases (4.9%), simultaneous changes in long tracts and CNs were observed. The IOM alterations were followed by neurological sequelae in 98 of 305 cases (32.1%); 62% of IOM alterations resulted in neurological deficits. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of CN deficits were 98% and 77%, respectively, and 95% and 85%, respectively, for long-tract deficits. Regarding location, brainstem and petroclival lesions were closely associated with concurrent CN IOM and SEP/MEP alterations. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of IOM alterations during surgery in the posterior fossa varied widely between different lesion locations and histopathological types. This analysis provides crucial information on the necessity of IOM in different surgical settings. Because MEP/SEP and CN IOM alterations were commonly observed during posterior fossa surgery, the authors recommend the simultaneous use of both modalities based on lesion location.
在颅后窝手术中,神经生理学术中监测(IOM)的首选方法主要包括早期脑干听觉诱发电位、自由运行肌电图和直接颅神经(CN)刺激。体感诱发电位(SEP)和运动诱发电位(MEP)长束监测很少使用。本研究调查了根据病变位置分层的颅后窝手术中 IOM 改变的发生率。
对 305 例接受各种颅后窝病变治疗的患者进行了标准化的 CN 和 SEP/MEP IOM。将 IOM 数据与病变位置和组织病理学类型以及其他可能的混杂因素相关联。
在 305 例患者中有 158 例(51.8%)(305 例 CN IOM 改变 130 例[42.6%],SEP/MEP IOM 改变 43 例[14.0%])观察到 IOM 改变。在 15 例(4.9%)中,同时观察到长束和 CN 的变化。在 305 例患者中,有 98 例(32.1%)出现 IOM 改变后的神经后遗症;98%的 IOM 改变导致神经功能缺损,长束和 CN 分别为 62%和 95%。对于 CN 缺损的检测,敏感性和特异性分别为 98%和 77%,长束缺损分别为 95%和 85%。关于位置,脑干和岩斜区病变与 CN IOM 和 SEP/MEP 改变密切相关。
在颅后窝手术中,IOM 改变的发生率因病变位置和组织病理学类型的不同而有很大差异。该分析提供了有关不同手术环境中 IOM 必要性的关键信息。由于在颅后窝手术中经常观察到 MEP/SEP 和 CN IOM 改变,作者建议根据病变位置同时使用这两种方法。