Williams Kate E, Nicholson Jan M, Walker Sue, Berthelsen Donna
School of Early Childhood, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Jun;86(2):331-50. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12109. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
Children's sleep problems and self-regulation problems have been independently associated with poorer adjustment to school, but there has been limited exploration of longitudinal early childhood profiles that include both indicators.
This study explores the normative developmental pathway for sleep problems and self-regulation across early childhood and investigates whether departure from the normative pathway is associated with later social-emotional adjustment to school.
This study involved 2,880 children participating in the Growing Up in Australia: The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) - Infant Cohort from Wave 1 (0-1 years) to Wave 4 (6-7 years).
Mothers reported on children's sleep problems, emotional, and attentional self-regulation at three time points from birth to 5 years. Teachers reported on children's social-emotional adjustment to school at 6-7 years. Latent profile analysis was used to establish person-centred longitudinal profiles.
Three profiles were found. The normative profile (69%) had consistently average or higher emotional and attentional regulation scores and sleep problems that steadily reduced from birth to 5 years. The remaining 31% of children were members of two non-normative self-regulation profiles, both characterized by escalating sleep problems across early childhood and below mean self-regulation. Non-normative group membership was associated with higher teacher-reported hyperactivity and emotional problems, and poorer classroom self-regulation and prosocial skills.
Early childhood profiles of self-regulation that include sleep problems offer a way to identify children at risk of poor school adjustment. Children with escalating early childhood sleep problems should be considered an important target group for school transition interventions.
儿童的睡眠问题和自我调节问题都与较差的学校适应能力独立相关,但对于包含这两个指标的幼儿期纵向概况的探索有限。
本研究探讨了幼儿期睡眠问题和自我调节的规范性发展路径,并调查偏离规范性路径是否与后期学校社会情感适应有关。
本研究涉及2880名儿童,他们参与了澳大利亚儿童成长纵向研究(LSAC)——婴儿队列,从第1波(0至1岁)到第4波(6至7岁)。
母亲们在孩子从出生到5岁的三个时间点报告孩子的睡眠问题、情绪和注意力自我调节情况。教师们在孩子6至7岁时报告其学校社会情感适应情况。采用潜在剖面分析来建立以个体为中心的纵向概况。
发现了三种概况。规范性概况(69%)的情绪和注意力调节得分一直处于平均水平或更高,且睡眠问题从出生到5岁稳步减少。其余31%的儿童属于两种非规范性自我调节概况,其特征均为幼儿期睡眠问题不断增加且自我调节低于平均水平。非规范性群体成员与教师报告的多动和情绪问题较多、课堂自我调节和亲社会技能较差有关。
包含睡眠问题的幼儿期自我调节概况为识别有学校适应不良风险的儿童提供了一种方法。幼儿期睡眠问题不断增加的儿童应被视为学校过渡干预的重要目标群体。