Suppr超能文献

所有直径大于4厘米的甲状腺结节都需要切除吗?对大甲状腺结节细针穿刺活检的评估。

DO ALL THYROID NODULES >4 CM NEED TO BE REMOVED? AN EVALUATION OF THYROID FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY IN LARGE THYROID NODULES.

作者信息

Kulstad Roger

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2016 Jul;22(7):791-8. doi: 10.4158/EP151150.OR. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Controversy exists regarding the ability of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy to rule out malignancy when thyroid nodules exceed 4 cm in diameter. The goal of this study was to provide data regarding FNA accuracy in a clinical setting for detecting/ruling out malignancy in large thyroid nodules (≥4 cm) and discuss FNA utility in guiding surgical decisions.

METHODS

All thyroid FNA cases performed at Marshfield Clinic from 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2010 followed by complete or partial thyroidectomy on nodules of at least 4 cm were identified. Demographics, medical history, nodule biopsy characteristics, surgical procedures, and diagnosis data were abstracted. FNA was compared to histologic evaluation of surgical specimens.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients with large thyroid nodules were identified. Most had a single large nodule, but ~40% were multinodular, and 206 total nodules were assessed. Females outnumbered males, and the mean age was ~50 years. After surgery, cancer was histologically identified in 49/206 (23.8%) nodules, including 9/123 nodules that had been categorized as benign by FNA, corresponding to a false-negative rate of 7.3%. Sensitivity/specificity for detecting malignancy by FNA was ~80%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was just below 60%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 93% but rose to 96% when papillary microcarcinomas were excluded.

CONCLUSION

While FNA sensitivity in large nodules was relatively low, NPV was high, especially if incidental papillary microcarcinomas were excluded. When cancer prevalence and NPV are known, FNA can be a reliable "rule out" test in nodules ≥4 cm. This information is critical and can help guide the surgery decision, especially in high-risk patients. The decision for surgery should not be solely based on nodule size but should consider additional factors including cancer prevalence, clinical history, ultrasound features, surgical risk, and life expectancy.

ABBREVIATIONS

FNA = fine-needle aspiration NPV = negative predictive value PPV = positive predictive value.

摘要

目的

当甲状腺结节直径超过4厘米时,细针穿刺活检(FNA)排除恶性肿瘤的能力存在争议。本研究的目的是提供在临床环境中FNA检测/排除大甲状腺结节(≥4厘米)恶性肿瘤准确性的数据,并讨论FNA在指导手术决策中的效用。

方法

确定2000年1月1日至2010年12月31日在马什菲尔德诊所进行的所有甲状腺FNA病例,随后对至少4厘米的结节进行全甲状腺切除或部分甲状腺切除。提取人口统计学、病史、结节活检特征、手术程序和诊断数据。将FNA与手术标本的组织学评估进行比较。

结果

共确定198例大甲状腺结节患者。大多数患者有单个大结节,但约40%为多结节,共评估206个结节。女性多于男性,平均年龄约为50岁。手术后,在206个结节中的49个(23.8%)组织学上确诊为癌症,其中9个在FNA中被分类为良性的123个结节,假阴性率为7.3%。FNA检测恶性肿瘤的敏感性/特异性约为80%。阳性预测值(PPV)略低于60%,阴性预测值(NPV)为93%,但排除微小乳头状癌后升至96%。

结论

虽然大结节中FNA的敏感性相对较低,但NPV较高,尤其是排除偶然的微小乳头状癌时。当癌症患病率和NPV已知时,FNA可以作为≥4厘米结节可靠的“排除”检测。这些信息至关重要,有助于指导手术决策,尤其是在高危患者中。手术决策不应仅基于结节大小,还应考虑其他因素,包括癌症患病率、临床病史、超声特征、手术风险和预期寿命。

缩写

FNA = 细针穿刺;NPV = 阴性预测值;PPV = 阳性预测值

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验