Shafi Tariq, Michels Wieneke M, Levey Andrew S, Inker Lesley A, Dekker Friedo W, Krediet Raymond T, Hoekstra Tiny, Schwartz George J, Eckfeldt John H, Coresh Josef
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kidney Int. 2016 May;89(5):1099-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2015.10.011. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
Residual kidney function contributes substantially to solute clearance in dialysis patients but cannot be assessed without urine collection. We used serum filtration markers to develop dialysis-specific equations to estimate urinary urea clearance without the need for urine collection. In our development cohort, we measured 24-hour urine clearances under close supervision in 44 patients and validated these equations in 826 patients from the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis. For the development and validation cohorts, median urinary urea clearance was 2.6 and 2.4 ml/min, respectively. During the 24-hour visit in the development cohort, serum β-trace protein concentrations remained in steady state but concentrations of all other markers increased. In the validation cohort, bias (median measured minus estimated clearance) was low for all equations. Precision was significantly better for β-trace protein and β2-microglobulin equations and the accuracy was significantly greater for β-trace protein, β2-microglobulin, and cystatin C equations, compared with the urea plus creatinine equation. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for detecting measured urinary urea clearance by equation-estimated urinary urea clearance (both 2 ml/min or more) were 0.821, 0.850, and 0.796 for β-trace protein, β2-microglobulin, and cystatin C equations, respectively; significantly greater than the 0.663 for the urea plus creatinine equation. Thus, residual renal function can be estimated in dialysis patients without urine collections.
残余肾功能对透析患者的溶质清除有很大贡献,但不进行尿液收集就无法评估。我们使用血清滤过标志物来开发特定于透析的方程,以在无需尿液收集的情况下估算尿尿素清除率。在我们的开发队列中,我们在密切监督下测量了44例患者的24小时尿液清除率,并在荷兰透析充分性合作研究的826例患者中验证了这些方程。对于开发队列和验证队列,尿尿素清除率中位数分别为2.6和2.4 ml/分钟。在开发队列的24小时访视期间,血清β-微球蛋白浓度保持稳定,但所有其他标志物的浓度均升高。在验证队列中,所有方程的偏差(测量的中位数减去估计的清除率)都很低。与尿素加肌酐方程相比,β-微球蛋白和β2-微球蛋白方程的精密度明显更好,β-微球蛋白、β2-微球蛋白和胱抑素C方程的准确性明显更高。通过方程估计的尿尿素清除率检测测量的尿尿素清除率(均为2 ml/分钟或更高)的受试者工作特征曲线下面积,β-微球蛋白、β2-微球蛋白和胱抑素C方程分别为0.821、0.850和0.796;明显大于尿素加肌酐方程的0.663。因此,无需尿液收集即可估算透析患者的残余肾功能。