Santana Heiko T, de Freitas Marise R, Ferraz Edmundo M, Evangelista Maria S N
General Management of Health Services, National Health Surveillance Agency - ANVISA, Brasilia, Brazil.
Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
J Infect Public Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):586-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2015.12.019. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
The World Health Organization (WHO) created the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist to prevent adverse events in operating rooms. The aim of this study was to analyze WHO checklist implementation in three operating rooms of public hospitals in the Brazilian Federal District. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed with pre- (Period I) and post (Period II)-checklist intervention evaluations. A total of 1141 patients and 1052 patients were studied in Periods I and II for a total of 2193 patients. Period I took place from December 2012 to March 2013, and Period II took place from April 2013 to August 2014. Regarding the pre-operatory items, most surgeries were classified as clean-contaminated in both phases, and team attire improved from 19.2% to 71.0% in Period II. Regarding checklist adherence in Period II, "Patient identification" significantly improved in the stage "Before induction of anesthesia". "Allergy verification", "Airway obstruction verification", and "Risk of blood loss assessment" had low adherence in all three hospitals. The items in the stage "Before surgical incision" showed greater than 90.0% adherence with the exception of "Anticipated critical events: Anesthesia team review" (86.7%) and "Essential imaging display" (80.0%). Low adherence was noted in "Instrument counts" and "Equipment problems" in the stage "Before patient leaves operating room". Complications and deaths were low in both periods. Despite the variability in checklist item compliance in the surveyed hospitals, WHO checklist implementation as an intervention tool showed good adherence to the majority of the items on the list. Nevertheless, motivation to use the instrument by the surgical team with the intent of improving surgical patient safety continues to be crucial.
世界卫生组织(WHO)制定了《WHO手术安全核对表》以预防手术室中的不良事件。本研究的目的是分析巴西联邦区公立医院的三个手术室中《WHO核对表》的实施情况。进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,对核对表干预前(第一阶段)和干预后(第二阶段)进行评估。在第一阶段和第二阶段分别对1141例患者和1052例患者进行了研究,共计2193例患者。第一阶段从2012年12月至2013年3月,第二阶段从2013年4月至2014年8月。关于术前项目,两个阶段的大多数手术都被归类为清洁-污染手术,团队着装在第二阶段从19.2%提高到了71.0%。关于第二阶段核对表的依从性,“患者识别”在“麻醉诱导前”阶段有显著改善。“过敏验证”“气道梗阻验证”和“失血风险评估”在所有三家医院的依从性都较低。“手术切口前”阶段的项目除了“预期关键事件:麻醉团队评估”(86.7%)和“基本影像显示”(80.0%)外,依从性均高于90.0%。在“患者离开手术室前”阶段,“器械清点”和“设备问题”的依从性较低。两个阶段的并发症和死亡率都较低。尽管被调查医院核对表项目的依从性存在差异,但作为一种干预工具,《WHO核对表》的实施对清单上的大多数项目显示出良好的依从性。然而,手术团队使用该工具以提高手术患者安全性的积极性仍然至关重要。