• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同准备间隔对任务转换中重复过程的调节作用:一项事件相关电位研究

Differential Preparation Intervals Modulate Repetition Processes in Task Switching: An ERP Study.

作者信息

Wang Min, Yang Ping, Zhao Qian-Jing, Wang Meng, Jin Zhenlan, Li Ling

机构信息

Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Feb 18;10:57. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00057. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00057
PMID:26924974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4757667/
Abstract

In task-switching paradigms, reaction times (RTs) switch cost (SC) and the neural correlates underlying the SC are affected by different preparation intervals. However, little is known about the effect of the preparation interval on the repetition processes in task-switching. To examine this effect we utilized a cued task-switching paradigm with long sequences of repeated trials. Response-stimulus intervals (RSI) and cue-stimulus intervals (CSI) were manipulated in short and long conditions. Electroencephalography (EEG) and behavioral data were recorded. We found that with increasing repetitions, RTs were faster in the short CSI conditions, while P3 amplitudes decreased in the LS (long RSI and short CSI) conditions. Positive correlations between RT benefit and P3 activation decrease (repeat 1 - repeat 5), and between the slope of the RT and P3 regression lines were observed only in the LS condition. Our findings suggest that differential preparation intervals modulate repetition processes in task switching.

摘要

在任务切换范式中,反应时间(RTs)、切换成本(SC)以及SC背后的神经关联会受到不同准备间隔的影响。然而,关于准备间隔对任务切换中重复过程的影响却知之甚少。为了研究这种影响,我们采用了一种带有长序列重复试验的线索任务切换范式。在短条件和长条件下对反应-刺激间隔(RSI)和线索-刺激间隔(CSI)进行了操控。记录了脑电图(EEG)和行为数据。我们发现,随着重复次数的增加,在短CSI条件下RTs更快,而在LS(长RSI和短CSI)条件下P3波幅减小。仅在LS条件下观察到RT获益与P3激活降低(重复1 - 重复5)之间以及RT和P3回归线斜率之间存在正相关。我们的研究结果表明,不同的准备间隔会调节任务切换中的重复过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/adaa408fe918/fnhum-10-00057-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/a3bee9d0534b/fnhum-10-00057-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/8f29201fda5b/fnhum-10-00057-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/3707dcc7ae7c/fnhum-10-00057-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/fedc9e619138/fnhum-10-00057-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/e2fd682571c5/fnhum-10-00057-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/6948ec28d614/fnhum-10-00057-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/adaa408fe918/fnhum-10-00057-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/a3bee9d0534b/fnhum-10-00057-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/8f29201fda5b/fnhum-10-00057-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/3707dcc7ae7c/fnhum-10-00057-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/fedc9e619138/fnhum-10-00057-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/e2fd682571c5/fnhum-10-00057-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/6948ec28d614/fnhum-10-00057-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c550/4757667/adaa408fe918/fnhum-10-00057-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential Preparation Intervals Modulate Repetition Processes in Task Switching: An ERP Study.不同准备间隔对任务转换中重复过程的调节作用:一项事件相关电位研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Feb 18;10:57. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00057. eCollection 2016.
2
Neural mechanisms underlying the cost of task switching: an ERP study.任务转换成本的神经机制:一项 ERP 研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042233. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
3
Response inhibition in the task-switching paradigm.任务转换范式中的反应抑制。
Biol Psychol. 2020 Oct;156:107954. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107954. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
4
The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.线索提示任务切换中跨通道注意准备与通道兼容性的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):955-965. doi: 10.1177/1747021818771836. Epub 2018 May 7.
5
Component processes underlying voluntary task selection: Separable contributions of task-set inertia and reconfiguration.自愿任务选择的组成过程:任务集惯性和重新配置的可分离贡献。
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104685. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104685. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Stimulus-level interference disrupts repetition benefit during task switching in middle childhood.刺激水平干扰会在儿童中期的任务转换中破坏重复收益。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 5;7:841. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00841. eCollection 2013.
7
Switching between univalent task-sets in schizophrenia: ERP evidence of an anticipatory task-set reconfiguration deficit.精神分裂症中单价任务集之间的转换:预期任务集重新配置缺陷的事件相关电位证据。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Oct;117(10):2172-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.716. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
8
Task preparation and task repetition: two-component model of task switching.任务准备与任务重复:任务转换的双成分模型
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):764-78.
9
Sequence effects in cued task switching modulate response preparedness and repetition priming processes.提示任务转换中的序列效应调节反应准备和重复启动过程。
Psychophysiology. 2010 Mar 1;47(2):365-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00932.x. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
10
Age-related Electrophysical Correlates of Cross-modal Attention Switching.跨模态注意转换的年龄相关电生理关联
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jan 2;37(1):43-62. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02248.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct brain responses to different inhibitions: Evidence from a modified Flanker Task.对不同抑制的不同大脑反应:来自改进型 Flanker 任务的证据。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 27;7(1):6657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04907-y.
2
Differential roles of the dorsal prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices in visual search: a TMS study.背侧前额叶皮质和顶叶后皮质在视觉搜索中的不同作用:一项经颅磁刺激研究
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 25;6:30300. doi: 10.1038/srep30300.
3
Prediction of Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Using MRI and Structural Network Features.

本文引用的文献

1
Consecutive repetition effects for affective-distractor pictures in a visual oddball task: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study.连续重复效应在视觉Oddball 任务中的情感分心图片:来自 ERP 研究的电生理证据。
Brain Res. 2013 Jun 23;1517:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
2
Neural mechanisms underlying the cost of task switching: an ERP study.任务转换成本的神经机制:一项 ERP 研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042233. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
3
Advance preparation in task-switching: converging evidence from behavioral, brain activation, and model-based approaches.
利用磁共振成像(MRI)和结构网络特征预测轻度认知障碍向阿尔茨海默病的转化
Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Apr 19;8:76. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00076. eCollection 2016.
任务转换中的预先准备:来自行为、大脑激活和基于模型方法的综合证据。
Front Psychol. 2010 Jul 15;1:25. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00025. eCollection 2010.
4
fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation?fMRI 重复抑制:神经元适应还是刺激预期?
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Mar;22(3):567-76. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr119. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
5
Challenging a decade of brain research on task switching: brain activation in the task-switching paradigm reflects adaptation rather than reconfiguration of task sets.对十年来任务切换的大脑研究提出挑战:任务切换范式中的大脑激活反映的是任务集的适应而非重新配置。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Mar;33(3):639-51. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21234. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
6
Sequence effects in cued task switching modulate response preparedness and repetition priming processes.提示任务转换中的序列效应调节反应准备和重复启动过程。
Psychophysiology. 2010 Mar 1;47(2):365-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00932.x. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
7
Rapid formation of pragmatic rule representations in the human brain during instruction-based learning.在基于指导的学习过程中,人类大脑中语用规则表示的快速形成。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Jul;20(7):1656-67. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp228. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
8
Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations.神经重复抑制反映了已实现的知觉预期。
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Sep;11(9):1004-6. doi: 10.1038/nn.2163.
9
Repetition suppression and reactivation in auditory-verbal short-term recognition memory.听觉言语短期识别记忆中的重复抑制与重新激活
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jun;19(6):1474-85. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn186. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
10
Learning and consolidation of novel spoken words.新口语词汇的学习与巩固
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Apr;21(4):803-20. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21059.