Anicetti V R, Simonetti M A, Blackwood L L, Jones A J, Chen A B
Department of Medicinal and Analytical Chemistry, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080.
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1989 Nov;22(2):151-68. doi: 10.1007/BF02921742.
Three immunization procedures were compared for the production of antibodies to the minor components of a complex E. coli protein (ECP) mixture: a conventional protocol and two methods that allow for the selective in vitro (cascade) or in vivo (passive) depletion of highly immunogenic proteins. An indirect ELISA showed that a maximum ELISA antibody titer was obtained with all the procedures 60 d after immunization. Analysis of these antisera by two-dimensional SDS-PAGE immunoblots, however, demonstrated that antibody reactivity to minor components in the mixture was not achieved until 112 d. This analysis also showed that a marked improvement in antibody response to minor components was obtained with the cascade immunization procedure. The mean titer and spectrum of antibody reactivity was similar for each group, and suggested that, although some individual variation was noted, the improvements observed were the result of the protocol used. Thus, for these ECPs, and multiple antigen mixtures in general, the preferred immunization protocol should employ at least three hosts and utilize the cascade immunization of Thalhamer and Freund. Characterization of the resulting antisera is best performed by use of silver stained two-dimensional SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.
比较了三种免疫程序用于产生针对复杂大肠杆菌蛋白(ECP)混合物中次要成分的抗体:一种传统方案以及两种能够选择性在体外(级联)或体内(被动)去除高免疫原性蛋白的方法。间接ELISA显示,免疫后60天所有程序均获得了最大ELISA抗体效价。然而,通过二维SDS-PAGE免疫印迹分析这些抗血清表明,直到112天才能实现对混合物中次要成分的抗体反应性。该分析还表明,级联免疫程序使针对次要成分的抗体反应有显著改善。每组的平均效价和抗体反应性谱相似,这表明,尽管存在一些个体差异,但观察到的改善是所用方案的结果。因此,对于这些ECP以及一般的多抗原混合物,优选的免疫方案应至少使用三个宿主并采用Thalhamer和Freund的级联免疫。所得抗血清的表征最好通过银染二维SDS-PAGE和免疫印迹进行。