Suppr超能文献

天然产物的生物剽窃与良好的生物勘探实践。

Biopiracy of natural products and good bioprospecting practice.

作者信息

Efferth Thomas, Banerjee Mita, Paul Norbert W, Abdelfatah Sara, Arend Joachim, Elhassan Gihan, Hamdoun Sami, Hamm Rebecca, Hong Chunlan, Kadioglu Onat, Naß Janine, Ochwangi Dominic, Ooko Edna, Ozenver Nadire, Saeed Mohamed E M, Schneider Mathias, Seo Ean-Jeong, Wu Ching-Fen, Yan Ge, Zeino Maen, Zhao Qiaoli, Abu-Darwish Mohammad S, Andersch Kai, Alexie Gladys, Bessarab Dawn, Bhakta-Guha Dipita, Bolzani Vanderlan, Dapat Else, Donenko Fedor V, Efferth Monika, Greten Henry J, Gunatilaka Leslie, Hussein Ahmed A, Karadeniz Asuman, Khalid Hassan E, Kuete Victor, Lee Ik-Soo, Liu Liang, Midiwo Jacob, Mora Rodrigo, Nakagawa Hiroshi, Ngassapa Olipa, Noysang Chanai, Omosa Leonida K, Roland Fred Hwiemtun, Shahat Abdelaaty A, Saab Antoine, Saeed Elfatih M, Shan Letian, Titinchi Salam J J

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Staudinger Weg 5, 55128 Mainz, Germany.

Department of English and Linguistics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Phytomedicine. 2016 Feb 15;23(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biopiracy mainly focuses on the use of biological resources and/or knowledge of indigenous tribes or communities without allowing them to share the revenues generated out of economic exploitation or other non-monetary incentives associated with the resource/knowledge.

METHODS

Based on collaborations of scientists from five continents, we have created a communication platform to discuss not only scientific topics, but also more general issues with social relevance. This platform was termed 'PhytCancer -Phytotherapy to Fight Cancer' (www.phyt-cancer.uni-mainz.de). As a starting point, we have chosen the topic "biopiracy", since we feel this is of pragmatic significance for scientists working with medicinal plants.

RESULTS

It was argued that the patenting of herbs or natural products by pharmaceutical corporations disregarded the ownership of the knowledge possessed by the indigenous communities on how these substances worked. Despite numerous court decisions in U.S.A. and Europe, several international treaties, (e.g. from United Nations, World Health Organization, World Trade Organization, the African Unity and others), sharing of a rational set of benefits amongst producers (mainly pharmaceutical companies) and indigenous communities is yet a distant reality. In this paper, we present an overview of the legal frameworks, discuss some exemplary cases of biopiracy and bioprospecting as excellent forms of utilization of natural resources.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest certain perspectives, by which we as scientists, may contribute towards prevention of biopiracy and also to foster the fair utilization of natural resources. We discuss ways, in which the interests of indigenous people especially from developing countries can be secured.

摘要

背景

生物剽窃主要指在未让本土部落或社区分享经济开发所产生的收益或与资源/知识相关的其他非货币激励措施的情况下,利用其生物资源和/或知识。

方法

基于来自五大洲科学家的合作,我们创建了一个交流平台,不仅讨论科学话题,还讨论更具社会相关性的一般性问题。这个平台被称为“植物抗癌——对抗癌症的植物疗法”(www.phyt-cancer.uni-mainz.de)。作为起点,我们选择了“生物剽窃”这个话题,因为我们觉得这对从事药用植物研究的科学家具有实际意义。

结果

有人认为,制药公司对草药或天然产品的专利申请无视了本土社区对这些物质作用方式所拥有知识的所有权。尽管美国和欧洲有众多法院判决,还有一些国际条约(例如来自联合国、世界卫生组织、世界贸易组织、非洲联盟等),但在生产者(主要是制药公司)和本土社区之间合理分配利益仍是遥远的现实。在本文中,我们概述了法律框架,讨论了一些生物剽窃和生物勘探的典型案例,将其作为自然资源利用的优秀形式。

结论

我们提出了某些观点,作为科学家,我们可以通过这些观点为防止生物剽窃以及促进自然资源的公平利用做出贡献。我们讨论了保障特别是来自发展中国家的原住民利益的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验