Fehr James J, Chao Jerry, Kuan Calvin, Zhong John
aWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri bAlbert Einstein School of Medicine, NYC, New York cAnesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California dSouthwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;29 Suppl 1:S14-20. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000313.
This article reviews the development of simulation-based training strategies to educate sedation providers.
Medical simulation has been utilized to train and evaluate providers in numerous domains related to sedation. Sedation providers come to the patient with a wide range of clinical training and experience and simulation can serve as a platform for achieving a baseline skill level and for periodic retraining. Although widely accepted by participants in simulation training, data demonstrating simulation's efficacy in improving sedation-related clinical outcomes are lacking.
Simulation provides an opportunity for sedation providers to develop deliberative practice, to consider rare or challenging clinical conditions, and to benefit from directed feedback, in a manner that does not put patients in harm's way.
本文综述了用于培训镇静服务提供者的基于模拟的培训策略的发展情况。
医学模拟已被用于在与镇静相关的众多领域培训和评估服务提供者。镇静服务提供者在临床培训和经验方面差异很大，而模拟可作为达到基本技能水平和定期再培训的平台。尽管模拟培训的参与者广泛接受模拟，但缺乏证明模拟在改善与镇静相关的临床结果方面有效性的数据。
模拟为镇静服务提供者提供了一个机会，以一种不会让患者受到伤害的方式进行审慎练习、考虑罕见或具有挑战性的临床情况，并从定向反馈中受益。
