• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于可生物降解聚合物的生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架的长期临床结果。

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of a Biodegradable Polymer-Based Biolimus-Eluting Stent.

作者信息

Im Eui, Kim Gwang-Sil, Shin Dong-Ho, Kim Jung-Sun, Kim Byeong-Keuk, Ko Young-Guk, Choi Donghoon, Jang Yangsoo, Hong Myeong-Ki

机构信息

Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yongin, Korea.

Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Apr;29(2):162-7. doi: 10.1111/joic.12283. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1111/joic.12283
PMID:26927804
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers in real-world clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

Long-term clinical outcomes of biolimus-eluting stents have not been clearly established.

METHODS

A total of 824 all-comer patients (971 lesions) treated with unrestricted implantation of a biolimus-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer were prospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into complex (413 patients) versus noncomplex (411 patients) groups according to the complexity of coronary lesions. Long-term clinical outcomes for stent efficacy (target lesion revascularization) and safety (composite of cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, and definite or probable stent thrombosis) were compared between the two groups during 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The complex group showed higher rates of decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, impaired renal function, previous history of myocardial infarction, and diabetes mellitus compared to the noncomplex group. In the overall population, the 5-year cumulative rate of target lesion revascularization was 4.8% (8.3% in the complex group vs 1.6% in the noncomplex group, P < 0.001). For stent safety, the 5-year cumulative rate for a composite of cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis was 2.5% overall (3.9% in the complex group vs 1.1% in the noncomplex group, P = 0.010). Overall 5-year cumulative rate of stent thrombosis was 0.4% (0.5% in the complex vs 0.2% in the noncomplex group, P = 0.561) with no very late stent thrombosis (VLST).

CONCLUSIONS

Biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents showed favorable efficacy and safety in all-comer patients during 5 years of follow-up.

摘要

目的

在真实世界临床实践中研究含可生物降解聚合物的生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架的长期临床结局。

背景

生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架的长期临床结局尚未明确确立。

方法

前瞻性纳入824例接受含可生物降解聚合物的生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架无限制植入治疗的所有患者(971处病变)。根据冠状动脉病变的复杂程度将患者分为复杂组(413例患者)和非复杂组(411例患者)。在5年随访期间比较两组在支架疗效(靶病变血运重建)和安全性(心源性死亡、靶病变相关心肌梗死以及明确或可能的支架血栓形成的复合终点)方面的长期临床结局。

结果

与非复杂组相比,复杂组左心室射血分数降低、肾功能受损、既往心肌梗死病史和糖尿病的发生率更高。在总体人群中,靶病变血运重建的5年累积发生率为4.8%(复杂组为8.3%,非复杂组为1.6%,P<0.001)。对于支架安全性,心源性死亡、靶病变相关心肌梗死和支架血栓形成复合终点的5年累积发生率总体为2.5%(复杂组为3.9%,非复杂组为1.1%,P=0.010)。支架血栓形成的总体5年累积发生率为0.4%(复杂组为0.5%,非复杂组为0.2%,P=0.561),无极晚期支架血栓形成(VLST)。

结论

在5年随访期间,含可生物降解聚合物的生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架在所有患者中显示出良好的疗效和安全性。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of a Biodegradable Polymer-Based Biolimus-Eluting Stent.一种基于可生物降解聚合物的生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架的长期临床结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Apr;29(2):162-7. doi: 10.1111/joic.12283. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
2
Comparison of Durable-Polymer Zotarolimus-Eluting and Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Clinical Outcomes in the Randomized SORT OUT VI Trial.比较载有雷帕霉素的可降解聚合物涂层与载有紫杉醇的可降解聚合物涂层冠状动脉支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用:随机 SORT OUT VI 试验 3 年的临床结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 13;10(3):255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Randomized Comparison of a Biodegradable Polymer Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SORT OUT VII Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中可生物降解聚合物超薄支柱西罗莫司洗脱支架与可生物降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架的随机对照比较:SORT OUT VII试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003610.
4
Biolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer-coated stent versus durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (SORT OUT V): a randomised non-inferiority trial.无聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的疗效比较:一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):661-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61962-X. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
5
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
6
Long-term outcomes of biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 3 randomized trials.糖尿病患者中生物可降解聚合物与永久性聚合物药物洗脱支架的长期结局:来自 3 项随机试验的个体患者数据汇总分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;168(6):5162-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.263. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
7
Clinical outcomes three-year after revascularization with biodegradable polymer stents: ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent versus biolimus-eluting stent: from the Scandinavian organization for randomized trials with clinical outcome VII trial.生物可降解聚合物支架血运重建 3 年后的临床结果:超薄支架西罗莫司洗脱支架与生物可降解聚合物支架雷帕霉素洗脱支架比较:来自斯堪的纳维亚随机临床试验组织 VII 临床试验。
Coron Artery Dis. 2020 Sep;31(6):485-492. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000875.
8
Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents at One-Year Follow-Up: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.一年随访期内生物可降解聚合物生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的比较:一项基于注册登记的队列研究。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2016 Apr 1;43(2):126-30. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4997. eCollection 2016 Apr.
9
2-year clinical follow-up from the randomized comparison of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer and sirolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in routine clinical practice.常规临床实践中生物可降解聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与永久性聚合物涂层西罗莫司洗脱支架随机比较的 2 年临床随访。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):887-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.017.
10
Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (COMPARE II): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.无聚合物可降解聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架(COMPARE II):一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):651-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61852-2. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized comparison of 9-month stent strut coverage of biolimus and everolimus drug-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Long-term (5-years) clinical follow-up (ROBUST trial).在ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,通过光学相干断层扫描对生物雷帕霉素和依维莫司药物洗脱支架9个月支架小梁覆盖率进行随机比较。长期(5年)临床随访(ROBUST试验)。
Cardiol J. 2023 Mar 10;30(6):921-8. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2023.0013.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Biodegradable Polymer-biolimus-eluting Stents (BP-BES) Compared with Durable Polymer-everolimus-eluting Stents (DP-EES) in Patients Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.在接受复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,可生物降解聚合物生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架(BP-BES)与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架(DP-EES)相比的安全性和有效性。
Korean Circ J. 2019 Jan;49(1):69-80. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0097. Epub 2018 Aug 24.