• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中可生物降解聚合物超薄支柱西罗莫司洗脱支架与可生物降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架的随机对照比较:SORT OUT VII试验

Randomized Comparison of a Biodegradable Polymer Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SORT OUT VII Trial.

作者信息

Jensen Lisette Okkels, Thayssen Per, Maeng Michael, Ravkilde Jan, Krusell Lars Romer, Raungaard Bent, Junker Anders, Terkelsen Christian Juhl, Veien Karsten Tange, Villadsen Anton Boel, Kaltoft Anne, Tilsted Hans-Henrik, Hansen Knud Nørregaard, Aaroe Jens, Kristensen Steen Dalby, Hansen Henrik Steen, Jensen Svend Eggert, Madsen Morten, Bøtker Hans Erik, Berencsi Klára, Lassen Jens Flensted, Christiansen Evald Høj

机构信息

From the Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (L.O.J., P.T., A.J., K.T.V., K.N.H., H.S.H.); Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark (M. Maeng, L.R.K., C.J.T., A.K., S.D.K., H.E.B., J.F.L., E.H.C.); Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (J.R., B.R., A.B.V., H.-H.T., J.A., S.E.J.); and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Denmark (M. Madsen, K.B.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003610.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003610
PMID:27412869
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers have been designed to improve safety and efficacy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome (SORT OUT) VII trial-a large-scale registry-based randomized, multicenter, single-blind, 2-arm, noninferiority trial-compared 2 biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents: the thin-strut cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent and the stainless steel biolimus-eluting Nobori stent in an all-comer patient population. The primary end point target lesion failure was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (not related to other than index lesion), or target lesion revascularization within 1 year, analyzed by intention to treat (noninferiority margin of 3.0%). Clinically driven event detection based on Danish registries was used. A total of 1261 patients were assigned to receive the sirolimus-eluting stent (1590 lesions) and 1264 patients to the biolimus-eluting stent (1588 lesions). At 1 year, the composite end point target lesion failure occurred in 48 patients (3.8%) in the sirolimus-eluting group and in 58 patients (4.6%) in the biolimus-eluting group (absolute risk difference, -0.78% [upper limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 0.61%]; P<0.0001). Rates of definite stent thrombosis occurred in 5 (0.4%) of the sirolimus-eluting group compared with 15 (1.2%) biolimus-eluting stent-treated patients (rate ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.92; P=0.034), which largely was attributable to a lower risk of subacute definite stent thrombosis: 0.1% versus 0.6% (rate ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.00; P=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The thin-strut sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent was noninferior to the biolimus-eluting Nobori stent in unselected patients for target lesion failure at 1 year.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01879358.

摘要

背景

具有可生物降解聚合物的冠状动脉药物洗脱支架旨在提高安全性和有效性。

方法与结果

斯堪的纳维亚临床结局随机试验组织(SORT OUT)VII试验——一项基于大规模注册研究的随机、多中心、单盲、双臂、非劣效性试验——在所有患者群体中比较了两种可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架:薄支柱钴铬西罗莫司洗脱Orsiro支架和不锈钢生物素洗脱Nobori支架。主要终点靶病变失败是指心脏死亡、心肌梗死(与靶病变无关)或1年内靶病变血运重建的复合情况,采用意向性分析(非劣效界值为3.0%)。基于丹麦注册研究进行临床驱动的事件检测。共有1261例患者被分配接受西罗莫司洗脱支架(1590个病变),1264例患者接受生物素洗脱支架(1588个病变)。1年时,西罗莫司洗脱组48例患者(3.8%)发生复合终点靶病变失败,生物素洗脱组58例患者(4.6%)发生(绝对风险差异,-0.78%[单侧95%置信区间上限,0.61%];P<0.0001)。西罗莫司洗脱组5例(0.4%)发生明确支架内血栓形成,而生物素洗脱支架治疗患者为15例(1.2%)(率比,0.33;95%置信区间,0.12 - 0.92;P = 0.034),这主要归因于亚急性明确支架内血栓形成风险较低:0.1%对0.6%(率比,0.12;95%置信区间,0.02 - 1.00;P = 0.05)。

结论

在未选择的患者中,薄支柱西罗莫司洗脱Orsiro支架在1年时靶病变失败方面不劣于生物素洗脱Nobori支架。

临床试验注册

网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01879358。

相似文献

1
Randomized Comparison of a Biodegradable Polymer Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SORT OUT VII Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中可生物降解聚合物超薄支柱西罗莫司洗脱支架与可生物降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架的随机对照比较:SORT OUT VII试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003610.
2
Comparison of Durable-Polymer Zotarolimus-Eluting and Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Clinical Outcomes in the Randomized SORT OUT VI Trial.比较载有雷帕霉素的可降解聚合物涂层与载有紫杉醇的可降解聚合物涂层冠状动脉支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用:随机 SORT OUT VI 试验 3 年的临床结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 13;10(3):255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
Randomized Comparison of the Polymer-Free Biolimus-Coated BioFreedom Stent With the Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Orsiro Stent in an All-Comers Population Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SORT OUT IX Trial.随机比较聚合物自由的生物可吸收雷帕霉素洗脱紫杉醇 Orsiro 支架与超薄支架生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱 BioFreedom 支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的所有患者中的疗效:SORT OUT IX 试验。
Circulation. 2020 Jun 23;141(25):2052-2063. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040241. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
Everolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymers in Unselected Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial With 1-Year Follow-Up (SORT OUT VIII Trial).无聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架与生物可吸收聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架治疗行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的未选择患者的随机非劣效性试验:1 年随访(SORT OUT VIII 试验)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 8;12(7):624-633. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.036.
5
Clinical outcomes three-year after revascularization with biodegradable polymer stents: ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent versus biolimus-eluting stent: from the Scandinavian organization for randomized trials with clinical outcome VII trial.生物可降解聚合物支架血运重建 3 年后的临床结果:超薄支架西罗莫司洗脱支架与生物可降解聚合物支架雷帕霉素洗脱支架比较:来自斯堪的纳维亚随机临床试验组织 VII 临床试验。
Coron Artery Dis. 2020 Sep;31(6):485-492. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000875.
6
Randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent with a biolimus-eluting Nobori stent in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and study design of the Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome VII trial.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,西罗莫司洗脱Orsiro支架与生物雷帕霉素洗脱Nobori支架的随机对照研究:斯堪的纳维亚临床结局随机试验组织VII试验的原理与研究设计
Am Heart J. 2015 Aug;170(2):210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 May 22.
7
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
8
1-Year Clinical Outcomes of All Comers Treated With 2 Bioresorbable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of the COMBO and Ultrathin-Strut Orsiro Stents.全人群患者接受 2 款生物可吸收聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架治疗 1 年的临床结局:COMBO 和 Ultrathin-Strut Orsiro 支架倾向性评分匹配比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 13;13(7):820-830. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.023.
9
Five-Year Clinical Outcome of the Biodegradable Polymer Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Compared to the Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From the SORT OUT VII Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中,生物可降解聚合物超薄支柱西罗莫司洗脱支架与生物可降解聚合物比伐卢定洗脱支架的五年临床结局:来自SORT OUT VII试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan;16(1):e012332. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012332. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
10
Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.用于经皮冠状动脉血运重建的超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架对比:BIOSCIENCE试验的2年结果
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 15;5(3):e003255. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003255.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-Eluting Stent Use in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions-A Narrative Review.药物洗脱支架在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 1;14(13):4643. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134643.
2
Everolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers in unselected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: five-year results of the randomised, non-inferiority SORT OUT VIII trial.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的未选择患者中,依维莫司洗脱支架与含可生物降解聚合物的生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架对比:随机、非劣效性SORT OUT VIII试验的五年结果
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jun 2;21(11):e629-e638. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00763.
3
Five-year outcomes of a drug-coated polymer-free biolimus-eluting stent versus an ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent.
无药物涂层聚合物的生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与超薄支可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的五年随访结果
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jun 2;21(11):e617-e628. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00586.
4
Safety and efficacy of Evermine50 Everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in patients with native coronary artery lesions: Three-year outcomes from a single-center.依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统(Evermine50)在原发性冠状动脉病变患者中的安全性和有效性:单中心三年随访结果
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2025 Mar 18;17(1):58-65. doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.025.33123. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Rotational Atherectomy in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era.药物洗脱支架时代旋磨术的临床结果
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 24;14(7):2199. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072199.
6
Use cases of registry-based randomized controlled trials-A review of the registries' contributions and constraints.基于注册的随机对照试验的应用案例——对注册研究的贡献和限制的回顾。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov;17(11):e70072. doi: 10.1111/cts.70072.
7
Five-year outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus treated with a sirolimus-eluting or a biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer. From the SORT OUT VII trial.载有西罗莫司或依维莫司的可生物降解聚合物涂层支架治疗糖尿病患者的 5 年结果:来自 SORT OUT VII 试验。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2024 Sep-Oct;21(5):14791641241283939. doi: 10.1177/14791641241283939.
8
Comparative effectiveness of ultrathin vs. standard strut drug-eluting stents: insights from a large-scale meta-analysis with extended follow-up.超小径药物洗脱支架与标准支架的比较效果:一项具有延长随访的大规模荟萃分析的见解。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 27;29(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01949-7.
9
Efficacy and safety of durable versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死后并发心源性休克患者中使用持久聚合物药物洗脱支架与可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架的疗效和安全性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 15;14(1):6301. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56925-2.
10
Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Total Occlusive Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesion-Related Acute Myocardial Infarction.继发于完全闭塞性无保护左主干冠状动脉病变相关急性心肌梗死的心源性休克患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的临床结局
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 7;12(4):1311. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041311.