Winocour P H, Bhatnagar D, Kalsi P, Hillier V F, Anderson D C
Department of Medicine, University of Manchester, Hope Hospital, Salford, UK.
Clin Biochem. 1989 Dec;22(6):457-61. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(89)80098-0.
We have studied associations between various direct measures of glycaemia and glycated blood proteins in 113 subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), and examined whether or not the 'fructosamine' assay results were affected by differing patient serum concentrations of lipids, albumin or C peptide. Serum fructosamine correlated less closely with HbA1 (r = 0.44) than did HbA1 with glycated serum albumin (GSA) (r = 0.68). Serum fructosamine and GSA also were poorly correlated (r = 0.48). Although fructosamine, HbA1 and GSA correlated to a similar degree with fasting blood glucose (r range 0.34 to 0.37), GSA was most closely related to mean blood glucose (r = 0.39 vs. 0.30-0.35) and the M value (a marker of diurnal glycaemic instability) (r = 0.42 vs. 0.33-0.35). The serum concentration of fructosamine was not significantly affected by a variation in serum cholesterol, but tended to be lower in subjects with moderate hypertriglyceridaemia (p = 0.05). The fructosamine assay may be altered by moderately lipaemic serum but is not affected by serum albumin concentration in normoalbuminaemic patients with IDDM. Our study indicates, however, that GSA is a more reliable marker of short-term glycaemic control in IDDM than fructosamine.
我们研究了113名胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者血糖的各种直接测量指标与糖化血蛋白之间的关联,并检查了“果糖胺”检测结果是否受患者血清中不同脂质、白蛋白或C肽浓度的影响。血清果糖胺与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1)的相关性(r = 0.44)低于HbA1与糖化血清白蛋白(GSA)的相关性(r = 0.68)。血清果糖胺和GSA的相关性也较差(r = 0.48)。尽管果糖胺、HbA1和GSA与空腹血糖的相关性程度相似(r范围为0.34至0.37),但GSA与平均血糖(r = 0.39,而其他为0.30 - 0.35)和M值(日间血糖波动的一个指标)的相关性最为密切(r = 0.42,而其他为0.33 - 0.35)。血清果糖胺浓度不受血清胆固醇变化的显著影响,但在中度高甘油三酯血症患者中往往较低(p = 0.05)。果糖胺检测可能会受到中度脂血血清的影响,但在IDDM正常白蛋白血症患者中不受血清白蛋白浓度的影响。然而,我们的研究表明,在IDDM中,GSA是比果糖胺更可靠的短期血糖控制指标。