• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

就患者住院的主要康复目标而言,住院患者和医护人员的看法多久能达成一致?

How often are hospitalized patients and providers on the same page with regard to the patient's primary recovery goal for hospitalization?

作者信息

Figueroa Jose F, Schnipper Jeffrey L, McNally Kelly, Stade Diana, Lipsitz Stuart R, Dalal Anuj K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2016 Sep;11(9):615-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2569. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1002/jhm.2569
PMID:26929079
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To deliver high-quality, patient-centered care during hospitalization, healthcare providers must correctly identify the patient's primary recovery goal.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degree of concordance between patients and key hospital providers.

DESIGN

A validated questionnaire administered to a random sample of hospitalized patients alongside their nurse and physician provider. Goals included: "be cured," "live longer," "improve/maintain health," "be comfortable," "accomplish a particular life goal," or "other."

SETTING

Major academic hospital in Boston, Massachusetts.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients admitted for more than 48 hours from November 2013 to May 2014 were eligible. When a patient was incapacitated, a legal proxy was interviewed. The nurse and physician provider were then interviewed within 24 hours.

MEASUREMENTS

Frequencies of responses for each recovery goal and the rate of concordance among the patient, nurse, and physician provider were measured. The frequency of responses across groups were compared using adjusted χ(2) analyses. Inter-rater agreement was measured using 2-way Kappa tests.

RESULTS

All 3 participants were interviewed in 109 of the 181 (60.2%) patients approached (or with proxy available). Significant differences in selected goals were observed across respondent groups (P < 0.001). Patients frequently chose "be cured" (46.8%). Nurses and physician providers frequently selected "improve or maintain health" (38.5% and 46.8%, respectively). All 3 participants selected the same goal in 22 cases (20.2%). Inter-rater agreement was poor to slight for all pairs (kappa 0.09 [-0.03-0.19], 0.19 [0.08-0.30], and 0.20 [0.08-0.32] for patient-physician, patient-nurse, and nurse-physician, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed poor to slight concordance among hospitalized patients and key medical team members with regard to the patient's primary recovery goal. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:615-619. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.

摘要

背景

为在住院期间提供高质量的、以患者为中心的护理,医疗服务提供者必须正确识别患者的主要康复目标。

目的

确定患者与关键医院提供者之间的一致程度。

设计

对随机抽取的住院患者及其护士和医生提供者进行一份经过验证的问卷调查。目标包括:“治愈”、“活得更长”、“改善/维持健康”、“舒适”、“实现特定生活目标”或“其他”。

地点

马萨诸塞州波士顿的一家大型学术医院。

参与者

2013年11月至2014年5月入院超过48小时的成年患者符合条件。当患者无行为能力时,对法定代理人进行访谈。然后在24小时内对护士和医生提供者进行访谈。

测量

测量每个康复目标的回答频率以及患者、护士和医生提供者之间的一致率。使用校正χ(2)分析比较各组的回答频率。使用双向Kappa检验测量评分者间的一致性。

结果

在181例(60.2%)被接触的患者(或有代理人)中,109例患者的所有三方参与者都接受了访谈。在不同回答者组中观察到选定目标存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。患者经常选择“治愈”(46.8%)。护士和医生提供者经常选择“改善或维持健康”(分别为38.5%和46.8%)。在22例(20.2%)中,所有三方参与者选择了相同的目标。所有配对的评分者间一致性均为差到一般(患者与医生、患者与护士、护士与医生的kappa值分别为0.09[-0.03 - 0.19]、0.19[0.08 - 0.30]和0.20[0.08 - 0.32])。

结论

我们观察到住院患者与关键医疗团队成员在患者主要康复目标方面的一致性为差到一般。《医院医学杂志》2016年;11:615 - 619。©2016医院医学协会。

相似文献

1
How often are hospitalized patients and providers on the same page with regard to the patient's primary recovery goal for hospitalization?就患者住院的主要康复目标而言,住院患者和医护人员的看法多久能达成一致?
J Hosp Med. 2016 Sep;11(9):615-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2569. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
2
Encouraging Patient-Centered Care by Including Quality-of-Life Questions on Pre-Encounter Forms.通过在会诊前表格中纳入生活质量问题来鼓励以患者为中心的护理。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):221-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1905.
3
Inter-Rater Agreement of Intensivists Evaluating the Goal Concordance of Preference-Sensitive ICU Interventions.重症监护医生评估偏好敏感 ICU 干预措施目标一致性的组内一致性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Sep;56(3):406-413.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
4
Differences between nurse- and physician-assessed ICU characteristics using a standardized survey.使用标准化调查问卷评估护士与医生所记录的重症监护病房特征之间的差异。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Oct;27(5):344-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv062. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
Faces of all clinically engaged staff: a quality improvement project that enhances the hospitalised patient experience.所有临床工作人员的面貌:一项提升住院患者体验的质量改进项目。
Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Nov;70(11):923-929. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12872. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
6
Responsiveness to the hospital patient needs in Poland.波兰医院对患者需求的响应能力。
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2014;65(2):155-64.
7
Patient-provider care goal concordance: implications for palliative care decisions.患者-提供者护理目标一致性:对姑息治疗决策的影响。
Psychol Health. 2019 Aug;34(8):983-998. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1584672. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
8
Can We Talk? Priorities for Patient Care Differed Among Health Care Providers
9
Prognosis Predictions by Families, Physicians, and Nurses of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: Agreement and Accuracy.严重急性脑损伤患者的家属、医生和护士的预后预测:一致性和准确性。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):38-46. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01501-7. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
10
Parent and Provider Experience and Shared Understanding After a Family-Centered Nighttime Communication Intervention.以家庭为中心的夜间沟通干预后的家长与医护人员体验及共同理解
Acad Pediatr. 2017 May-Jun;17(4):389-402. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing, pilot testing, and refining requirements for 3 EHR-integrated interventions to improve diagnostic safety in acute care: a user-centered approach.制定、试点测试并完善3种电子健康记录集成干预措施以提高急性护理诊断安全性的要求:一种以用户为中心的方法。
JAMIA Open. 2023 May 10;6(2):ooad031. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad031. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Prevalence and factors of discordance attitudes toward advance care planning between older patients and their family members in the primary medical and healthcare institution.在基层医疗机构中,老年患者及其家属对预先医疗照护计划的态度不一致的流行率及其影响因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;11:1013719. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1013719. eCollection 2023.
3
Primary care physician involvement during hospitalisation: a qualitative analysis of perspectives from frequently hospitalised patients.
基层医疗机构医生在住院期间的参与情况:经常住院患者观点的定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 1;11(12):e053784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053784.
4
Perspectives of Parents and Providers on Reasons for Mental Health Readmissions: A Content Analysis Study.家长和提供者对心理健康再入院原因的看法:一项内容分析研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Sep;48(5):830-838. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01134-6. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
5
Concordance of End-of-Life Care With End-of-Life Wishes in an Integrated Health Care System.在一个综合医疗保健系统中,临终关怀与临终愿望的一致性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e213053. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3053.
6
Understanding patients' end-of-life goals of care in the emergency department.了解急诊科患者的临终护理目标。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Mar 2;2(2):e12388. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12388. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Assessment of Discordance Between Surrogate Care Goals and Medical Treatment Provided to Older Adults With Serious Illness.评估老年重病患者的替代护理目标与所提供医疗护理之间的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205179. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5179.
8
Potential of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Patient Portal for Improving Care Plan Concordance during Acute Care.电子健康记录整合患者门户在改善急性护理期间照护计划一致性的潜力。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):358-366. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688831. Epub 2019 May 29.
9
A web-based and mobile patient-centered ''microblog'' messaging platform to improve care team communication in acute care.一个基于网络和移动设备的、以患者为中心的“微博”消息传递平台,用于改善急性护理中的医护团队沟通。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e178-e184. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw110.
10
A web-based, patient-centered toolkit to engage patients and caregivers in the acute care setting: a preliminary evaluation.一种基于网络的、以患者为中心的工具包,用于在急性护理环境中让患者和护理人员参与其中:初步评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):80-7. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv093. Epub 2015 Aug 2.