Suppr超能文献

严重急性脑损伤患者的家属、医生和护士的预后预测:一致性和准确性。

Prognosis Predictions by Families, Physicians, and Nurses of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: Agreement and Accuracy.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):38-46. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01501-7. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective shared decision-making relies on some degree of alignment between families and the medical team regarding a patient's likelihood of recovery. Patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) are often unable to participate in decisions, and therefore family members make decisions on their behalf. The goal of this study was to evaluate agreement between prognostic predictions by families, physicians, and nurses of patients with SABI regarding their likelihood of regaining independence and to measure each group's prediction accuracy.

METHODS

This observational cohort study, conducted from 01/2018 to 07/2020, was based in the neuroscience and medical/cardiac intensive care units of a single center. Patient eligibility included a diagnosis of SABI-specifically stroke, traumatic brain injury, or hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy-and a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12 after hospital day 2. At enrollment, families, physicians, and nurses were asked separately to predict a patient's likelihood of recovering to independence within 6 months on a 0-100 scale, regardless of whether a formal family meeting had occurred. True outcome was based on modified Rankin Scale assessment through a family report or medical chart review. Prognostic agreement was measured by (1) intraclass correlation coefficient; (2) mean group prediction comparisons using paired Student's t-tests; and (3) prevalence of concordance, defined as an absolute difference of less than 20 percentage points between predictions. Accuracy for each group was measured by calculating the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (C statistic) and compared by using DeLong's test.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 222 patients and families, 45 physicians, and 103 nurses. Complete data on agreement and accuracy were available for 187 and 177 patients, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient, in which 1 indicates perfect correlation and 0 indicates no correlation, was 0.49 for physician-family pairs, 0.40 for family-nurse pairs, and 0.66 for physician-nurse pairs. The difference in mean predictions between families and physicians was 23.5 percentage points (p < 0.001), 25.4 between families and nurses (p < 0.001), and 1.9 between physicians and nurses (p = 0.38). Prevalence of concordance was 39.6% for family-physician pairs, 30.0% for family-nurse pairs, and 56.2% for physician-nurse pairs. The C statistic for prediction accuracy was 0.65 for families, 0.82 for physicians, and 0.76 for nurses. The p values for differences in C statistics were < 0.05 for family-physician and family-nurse groups and 0.18 for physician-nurse groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with SABI, agreement in predictions between families, physicians, and nurses regarding likelihood of recovery is poor. Accuracy appears higher for physicians and nurses compared with families, with no significant difference between physicians and nurses.

摘要

背景

有效的共同决策依赖于家庭和医疗团队在患者康复可能性方面的某种程度的一致性。患有严重急性脑损伤(SABI)的患者通常无法参与决策,因此家庭成员代表他们做出决定。本研究的目的是评估 SABI 患者的家庭、医生和护士对其恢复独立性的可能性的预后预测之间的一致性,并衡量每个群体的预测准确性。

方法

这项观察性队列研究于 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 7 月在一个中心的神经科学和医学/心脏重症监护病房进行。患者入选标准包括 SABI 的特定诊断——中风、创伤性脑损伤或缺氧缺血性脑病——和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤12 分在住院第 2 天后。在入组时,家庭、医生和护士分别被要求在 0-100 的范围内预测患者在 6 个月内恢复独立的可能性,无论是否进行了正式的家庭会议。真实结果是基于通过家庭报告或医疗记录审查的改良 Rankin 量表评估。通过(1)组内相关系数;(2)使用配对学生 t 检验比较组均值预测;(3)定义为预测值之间差异小于 20 个百分点的一致性的比例,来衡量预后的一致性。使用接收者操作特征曲线下的面积(C 统计量)来衡量每个群体的准确性,并使用 DeLong 检验进行比较。

结果

共收集了 222 名患者及其家属、45 名医生和 103 名护士的数据。分别有 187 名和 177 名患者有完整的一致性和准确性数据。医师-家庭对之间的组内相关系数,其中 1 表示完全相关,0 表示不相关,为 0.49;家庭-护士对之间的组内相关系数为 0.40;医生-护士对之间的组内相关系数为 0.66。家庭与医生之间的平均预测值差异为 23.5 个百分点(p<0.001),家庭与护士之间的差异为 25.4 个百分点(p<0.001),医生与护士之间的差异为 1.9 个百分点(p=0.38)。家庭-医生对之间的一致性比例为 39.6%,家庭-护士对之间的一致性比例为 30.0%,医生-护士对之间的一致性比例为 56.2%。预测准确性的 C 统计量为家庭为 0.65,医生为 0.82,护士为 0.76。家庭-医生和家庭-护士组的 C 统计量差异的 p 值均小于 0.05,而医生-护士组的 p 值为 0.18。

结论

对于患有 SABI 的患者,家庭、医生和护士在恢复可能性方面的预后预测一致性较差。与家庭相比,医生和护士的准确性似乎更高,医生和护士之间没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Prognosis Predictions by Families, Physicians, and Nurses of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: Agreement and Accuracy.
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):38-46. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01501-7. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
Taking a Chance to Recover: Families Look Back on the Decision to Pursue Tracheostomy After Severe Acute Brain Injury.
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Apr;36(2):504-510. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01335-9. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
6
7
PREDICT-TBI: Comparison of Physician Predictions with the IMPACT Model to Predict 6-Month Functional Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury.
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Oct;39(2):455-463. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01718-0. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
8
Goal-Concordant Care After Severe Acute Brain Injury.
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 17;12:710783. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.710783. eCollection 2021.
9
Withholding and withdrawing of life support from patients with severe head injury.
Crit Care Med. 1995 Sep;23(9):1567-75. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199509000-00018.

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating with Families after Severe Acute Brain Injury.
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02252-x.
2
An Update on Palliative Care in Neurocritical Care: Providing Goal‑Concordant Care in the Face of Prognostic Uncertainty.
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2023 Dec;25(12):517-529. doi: 10.1007/s11940-023-00778-z. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
3
Disambiguating Consciousness in Clinical Settings.
Neurology. 2023 Nov 14;101(20):896-900. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207765. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
4
Patients' Families, Physicians, and Nurses: Trying to See Eye-to-Eye Regarding Prognosis in Neurocritical Care.
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):10-11. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01503-5. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

2
Participation and autonomy five years after stroke: A longitudinal observational study.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 8;14(7):e0219513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219513. eCollection 2019.
3
Prevalence of Disagreement About Appropriateness of Treatment Between ICU Patients/Surrogates and Clinicians.
Chest. 2019 Jun;155(6):1140-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.404. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
4
A Fate Worse Than Death: Prognostication of Devastating Brain Injury.
Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;47(4):591-598. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003647.
5
Gateway to Recovery: A Comparative Analysis of Stroke Patients' Experiences of Change and Learning in Norway and Denmark.
Rehabil Res Pract. 2019 Jan 17;2019:1726964. doi: 10.1155/2019/1726964. eCollection 2019.
6
Estimating Time Physicians and Other Health Care Workers Spend with Patients in an Intensive Care Unit Using a Sensor Network.
Am J Med. 2018 Aug;131(8):972.e9-972.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
7
Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care.
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Apr 16;2(2):84-87. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000081. eCollection 2017 Jun.
9
Is There Hope? Is She There? How Families and Clinicians Experience Severe Acute Brain Injury.
J Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;20(2):170-176. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0286. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
Correlation and agreement: overview and clarification of competing concepts and measures.
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 25;28(2):115-20. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216045.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验