Lefebvre Anne-Laure, Dubée Vincent, Cortes Mélanie, Dorchêne Delphine, Arthur Michel, Mainardi Jean-Luc
INSERM, U1138, LRMA, Equipe 12 du Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, F-75006, France Université Pierre et Marie Curie, UMR S 1138, Paris, France Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR S 1138, Paris, France.
INSERM, U1138, LRMA, Equipe 12 du Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, F-75006, France Université Pierre et Marie Curie, UMR S 1138, Paris, France Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR S 1138, Paris, France Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Microbiologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jun;71(6):1556-63. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw022. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
Cefoxitin and imipenem are the sole recommended β-lactams for the treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary infections. Here, we investigated whether one of these drugs displays superiority in terms of killing and intracellular activity. We have also evaluated whether the use of a β-lactamase inhibitor could improve their activity.
The impact of the β-lactamase BlaMab on the activity of β-lactams was assessed by comparing M. abscessus CIP104536 and its β-lactamase-deficient ΔblaMab derivative, as well as by using the β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam. The activity of cefoxitin, imipenem, amoxicillin and ceftaroline, alone and in various combinations including amikacin, was compared based on determination of time-kill curves and of intracellular proliferation in human macrophages.
Imipenem was superior to cefoxitin in both the time-kill and macrophage assays. Production of BlaMab limited the activity of imipenem. The combination of imipenem and amikacin was bactericidal against the ΔblaMab mutant. Deletion of blaMab extended the spectrum of β-lactams active against M. abscessus to include amoxicillin and ceftaroline. In the absence of BlaMab, amoxicillin was as active as imipenem. These drugs were more active than ceftaroline and cefoxitin was the least active. Avibactam increased the intracellular activity of ceftaroline, but inhibition of BlaMab was only partial, as previously reported for amoxicillin.
Evaluation of the killing and intracellular activities of β-lactams indicates that imipenem is superior to cefoxitin at clinically achievable drug concentrations. Inhibition of BlaMab could improve the efficacy of imipenem and extend the spectrum of drugs potentially useful to treat pulmonary infections.
头孢西丁和亚胺培南是治疗脓肿分枝杆菌肺部感染唯一推荐使用的β-内酰胺类药物。在此,我们研究了这两种药物在杀菌和细胞内活性方面是否存在优势。我们还评估了使用β-内酰胺酶抑制剂是否能提高它们的活性。
通过比较脓肿分枝杆菌CIP104536及其β-内酰胺酶缺陷型ΔblaMab衍生物,以及使用β-内酰胺酶抑制剂阿维巴坦,评估β-内酰胺酶BlaMab对β-内酰胺类药物活性的影响。基于时间-杀菌曲线的测定以及人巨噬细胞内增殖情况,比较头孢西丁、亚胺培南、阿莫西林和头孢托罗单独使用以及与包括阿米卡星在内的各种组合使用时的活性。
在时间-杀菌和巨噬细胞试验中,亚胺培南均优于头孢西丁。BlaMab的产生限制了亚胺培南的活性。亚胺培南与阿米卡星联合使用对ΔblaMab突变体具有杀菌作用。blaMab的缺失扩大了对脓肿分枝杆菌有活性的β-内酰胺类药物谱,包括阿莫西林和头孢托罗。在没有BlaMab的情况下,阿莫西林与亚胺培南活性相当。这些药物比头孢托罗更具活性,而头孢西丁活性最低。阿维巴坦增加了头孢托罗的细胞内活性,但对BlaMab的抑制只是部分抑制,正如之前报道的阿莫西林情况一样。
对β-内酰胺类药物的杀菌和细胞内活性评估表明,在临床可达到的药物浓度下,亚胺培南优于头孢西丁。抑制BlaMab可提高亚胺培南的疗效,并扩大可能用于治疗肺部感染的药物谱。