Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mount Sinai National Jewish Health Respiratory Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jul 22;64(8). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00098-20.
is a highly drug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM). Efforts to discover new treatments for infections are accelerating, with a focus on cell wall synthesis proteins ( l,d-transpeptidases 1 to 5 [Ldt to Ldt] and d,d-carboxypeptidase) that are targeted by β-lactam antibiotics. A challenge to this approach is the presence of chromosomally encoded β-lactamase (Bla). Using a mechanism-based approach, we found that a novel ceftaroline-imipenem combination effectively lowered the MICs of isolates (MIC ≤ 0.25 μg/ml; MIC ≤ 0.5 μg/ml). Combining ceftaroline and imipenem with a β-lactamase inhibitor, i.e., relebactam or avibactam, demonstrated only a modest effect on susceptibility compared to each of the β-lactams alone. In steady-state kinetic assays, Bla exhibited a lower (0.30 ± 0.03 μM for avibactam and 136 ± 14 μM for relebactam) and a higher acylation rate for avibactam (/= 3.4 × 10 ± 0.4 × 10 M s for avibactam and 6 × 10 ± 0.6 × 10 M s for relebactam). The / was nearly 10-fold lower for ceftaroline fosamil (0.007 ± 0.001 μM s) than for imipenem (0.056 ± 0.006 μM s). Timed mass spectrometry captured complexes of avibactam and Bla, Ldt, Ldt, Ldt, and d,d-carboxypeptidase, whereas relebactam bound only Bla, Ldt, and Ldt Interestingly, Ldt, Ldt, Ldt, Ldt, and d,d-carboxypeptidase bound only to imipenem when incubated with imipenem and ceftaroline fosamil. We next determined the binding constants of imipenem and ceftaroline fosamil for Ldt, Ldt, Ldt, and Ldt and showed that imipenem bound >100-fold more avidly than ceftaroline fosamil to Ldt and Ldt (e.g., or of Ldt = 0.01 ± 0.01 μM for imipenem versus 0.73 ± 0.08 μM for ceftaroline fosamil). Molecular modeling indicates that Ldt readily accommodates imipenem, but the active site must widen to ≥8 Å for ceftaroline to enter. Our analysis demonstrates that ceftaroline and imipenem binding to multiple targets (l,d-transpeptidases and d,d-carboxypeptidase) and provides a mechanistic rationale for the effectiveness of this dual β-lactam combination in infections.
是一种高度耐药的非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)。人们正在加紧努力,寻找 感染的新治疗方法,重点是针对细胞壁合成蛋白(l,d-转肽酶 1 至 5 [Ldt 至 Ldt]和 d,d-羧肽酶)的β-内酰胺抗生素。这种方法的一个挑战是存在染色体编码的β-内酰胺酶(Bla)。我们使用基于机制的方法发现,新型头孢洛林-亚胺培南组合可有效降低 分离株的 MIC(MIC≤0.25μg/ml;MIC≤0.5μg/ml)。与每种β-内酰胺单独使用相比,将头孢洛林和亚胺培南与β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(即雷巴坦或阿维巴坦)联合使用,对敏感性的影响仅适度。在稳态动力学测定中,Bla 对阿维巴坦的 (0.30±0.03μM 用于阿维巴坦和 136±14μM 用于雷巴坦)和酰化率更高(/=3.4×10±0.4×10 M s 用于阿维巴坦和 6×10±0.6×10 M s 用于雷巴坦)。头孢洛林膦酸(0.007±0.001μM s)与亚胺培南(0.056±0.006μM s)相比,头孢洛林的 / 低近 10 倍。时间质谱捕获了阿维巴坦和 Bla、Ldt、Ldt、Ldt 和 d,d-羧肽酶的复合物,而雷巴坦仅与 Bla、Ldt 和 Ldt 结合。有趣的是,当与亚胺培南和头孢洛林膦酸孵育时,Ldt、Ldt、Ldt、Ldt 和 d,d-羧肽酶仅与亚胺培南结合。接下来,我们确定了亚胺培南和头孢洛林膦酸对 Ldt、Ldt、Ldt 和 Ldt 的结合常数,并表明与头孢洛林膦酸相比,亚胺培南与 Ldt 和 Ldt 的结合更紧密(例如,Ldt 的 或 为 0.01±0.01μM 对于亚胺培南,而头孢洛林膦酸为 0.73±0.08μM)。分子建模表明,Ldt 很容易容纳亚胺培南,但活性部位必须加宽至≥8Å 才能使头孢洛林进入。我们的分析表明,头孢洛林和亚胺培南与多个靶标(l,d-转肽酶和 d,d-羧肽酶)结合,并为这种双重β-内酰胺组合在 感染中的有效性提供了机制上的依据。