• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同表面处理下长石质瓷与镍铬合金结合强度的比较评估:一项体外研究

A comparative evaluation of bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to nickel-chromium alloy, when subjected to various surface treatments: An in vitro study.

作者信息

Patel Kavan A, Mathur Somil, Upadhyay Snehal

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridgework, Faculty of Dental Science, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015 Jan-Mar;15(1):53-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.155036.

DOI:10.4103/0972-4052.155036
PMID:26929487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4762289/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose was to evaluate the effect of various surface treatments and sandblasting with different particle size on the bond strength of feldspathic porcelain with predominantly base metal alloys, using a universal testing machine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Totally, 40 specimen of nickel-chromium alloy were prepared in an induction casting machine. The groups divided were as follows: Group I-sandblasted with 50 μ Al2O3, Group II-sandblasted with 110 μ Al2O3, Group III-sandblasted with 250 μ Al2O3 and Group IV-sandblasted with 250 μ Al2O3, followed by oxidation and again sandblasted with 250 μ Al2O3. The dimensions of each specimen were adjusted so as to maintain the thickness of ceramic at 1 mm. The specimen were loaded on the assembly of the universal testing machine, and a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min was used to apply a compressive force at the junction of metal and feldspathic porcelain. The force application continued until adhesive fracture occurred, and the readings of the load applied to that particular specimen were recorded.

RESULTS

The means for shear bond strength for Group I, II, III and IV were found to be (226.92 ± 1.67), (233.16 ± 3.85), (337.81 ± 16.97) and (237.08 ± 4.33), respectively. Means of shear bond strength among the groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance test. Comparison between individual groups were made with Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference post-hoc test.

CONCLUSION

Different particle size and surface treatment have an important role on the bond strength of ceramic-metal interface. Greater particle size demonstrated higher bond strength.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在使用万能材料试验机评估不同表面处理以及不同粒径喷砂处理对主要为贱金属合金的长石质瓷粘结强度的影响。

材料与方法

在感应铸造机中制备了总共40个镍铬合金试件。分组如下:第一组用50μm的Al2O3喷砂处理;第二组用110μm的Al2O3喷砂处理;第三组用250μm的Al2O3喷砂处理;第四组先用250μm的Al2O3喷砂处理,然后进行氧化处理,再用250μm的Al2O3喷砂处理。调整每个试件的尺寸,使陶瓷厚度保持在1mm。将试件安装在万能材料试验机上,以0.5mm/min的十字头速度在金属与长石质瓷的结合处施加压缩力。持续施加力直至发生粘结断裂,并记录施加在该特定试件上的载荷读数。

结果

第一组、第二组、第三组和第四组的剪切粘结强度均值分别为(226.92±1.67)、(233.16±3.85)、(337.81±16.97)和(237.08±4.33)。使用单因素方差分析检验比较各组之间的剪切粘结强度均值。使用Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference事后检验对各个组进行比较。

结论

不同粒径和表面处理对陶瓷 - 金属界面的粘结强度有重要影响。粒径越大,粘结强度越高。

相似文献

1
A comparative evaluation of bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to nickel-chromium alloy, when subjected to various surface treatments: An in vitro study.不同表面处理下长石质瓷与镍铬合金结合强度的比较评估:一项体外研究
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015 Jan-Mar;15(1):53-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.155036.
2
An In Vitro Study on the Shear Bond Strength of Feldspathic Porcelain to Nickel Chromium Alloy and Cobalt Chromium Alloy after Various Surface Treatments.不同表面处理后长石质瓷与镍铬合金及钴铬合金剪切粘结强度的体外研究
Int J Dent. 2022 May 30;2022:2557127. doi: 10.1155/2022/2557127. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of porcelain to a beryllium-free alloy of nickel-chromium, nickel and beryllium free alloy of cobalt-chromium, and titanium: An study.瓷与无铍镍铬合金、无镍铍钴铬合金及钛的剪切粘结强度的评估与比较:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jul-Sep;17(3):261-266. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_337_16.
4
Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems.金属陶瓷修复系统的剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Sep;96(3):165-73. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.07.002.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Metal-ceramic Bond Strengths of Nickel Chromium and Cobalt Chromium Alloys on Repeated Castings: An In vitro Study.镍铬合金和钴铬合金反复铸造后金属陶瓷结合强度的比较评估:一项体外研究
J Int Oral Health. 2014 Sep;6(5):99-103.
6
Effect of Combined Surface Treatments on Surface Roughness and Resin Bond Strength to Y-TZP Ceramic and Nickel-Chromium Metal Alloy.联合表面处理对Y-TZP陶瓷和镍铬合金表面粗糙度及树脂粘结强度的影响
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019 Jul;37(7):442-450. doi: 10.1089/photob.2018.4590. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
7
To evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength of three different intraoral ceramic repair systems: an in vitro study.评估不同表面处理对三种不同口腔内陶瓷修复系统剪切粘结强度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Sep;13(3):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s13191-013-0270-x. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
8
Effects of surface treatments on bond strength between porcelain and electroformed gold substrates.表面处理对瓷与电铸金基底之间结合强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2009 Dec;11(6):485-91. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a18143.
9
Shear bond strength of porcelain to a new millable alloy and a conventional castable alloy.瓷与一种新型可切削合金及传统可铸造合金的剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Apr;113(4):329-35. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.016. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
10
Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.热加载和机械加载后玻璃陶瓷与商业纯钛及金合金的界面表征及附着力评估
Dent Mater. 2009 Feb;25(2):221-31. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Recast Cobalt Chrome Base Metal Alloy on Flexural Bond Strength of Metal Ceramic Restoration.重铸钴铬贱金属合金对金属烤瓷修复体弯曲粘结强度的影响。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3619-S3621. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1194_24. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
Effect of Sandblasting Parameters and the Type and Hardness of the Material on the Number of Embedded AlO Grains.喷砂参数、材料类型及硬度对嵌入AlO颗粒数量的影响
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jul 2;16(13):4783. doi: 10.3390/ma16134783.
3
An In Vitro Study on the Shear Bond Strength of Feldspathic Porcelain to Nickel Chromium Alloy and Cobalt Chromium Alloy after Various Surface Treatments.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of abrasive blasting on the strength of a joint between dental porcelain and metal base.喷砂处理对牙科烤瓷与金属基底之间结合强度的影响。
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2014;16(1):63-8.
2
Surface roughness of a dental ceramic after polishing with different vehicles and diamond pastes.使用不同工具和金刚石糊剂对牙科陶瓷进行抛光后的表面粗糙度。
Braz Dent J. 2006;17(3):191-4. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402006000300003.
3
The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.瓷抛光系统对长石质瓷颜色和表面质地的影响。
不同表面处理后长石质瓷与镍铬合金及钴铬合金剪切粘结强度的体外研究
Int J Dent. 2022 May 30;2022:2557127. doi: 10.1155/2022/2557127. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparing two intraoral porcelain repair systems for shear bond strength in repaired cohesive and adhesive fractures, for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations: An study.比较两种口腔内瓷修复系统在修复烤瓷熔附金属修复体的内聚性和黏附性骨折时的抗剪粘结强度:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Oct-Dec;19(4):362-368. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_120_19. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
5
Evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of porcelain to a beryllium-free alloy of nickel-chromium, nickel and beryllium free alloy of cobalt-chromium, and titanium: An study.瓷与无铍镍铬合金、无镍铍钴铬合金及钛的剪切粘结强度的评估与比较:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jul-Sep;17(3):261-266. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_337_16.
6
Comparison of the bond strength of ceramics to Co-Cr alloys made by casting and selective laser melting.铸造法和选择性激光熔化法制备的陶瓷与钴铬合金结合强度的比较。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;9(1):52-56. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.1.52. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Aug;96(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.009.
4
Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal.压铸陶瓷与金属熔接的结合强度与长石质瓷与金属熔接的结合强度的比较。
J Prosthodont. 2005 Dec;14(4):239-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00052.x.
5
Shear bond strengths of a ceramic system to alternative metal alloys.一种陶瓷系统与替代金属合金的剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jan;93(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.017.
6
Comparison of composite resin-to-porcelain bond strength with three adhesives.三种粘合剂对复合树脂与瓷粘结强度的比较。
Gen Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;48(4):418-21.
7
Influence of metal surface finishing on porcelain porosity and beam failure loads at the metal-ceramic interface.金属表面处理对金属-陶瓷界面处瓷层孔隙率及梁破坏载荷的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Sep;84(3):309-17. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.109488.
8
Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments.不同表面处理的瓷修复系统的粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Sep;78(3):267-74. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70025-8.
9
X-ray diffraction studies of oxidized high-palladium alloys.高钯氧化合金的X射线衍射研究。
Dent Mater. 1996 Nov;12(6):333-41. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80043-1.
10
Designs of bond strength tests for metal-ceramic complexes: review of the literature.金属陶瓷复合体粘结强度测试的设计:文献综述
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Jun;75(6):602-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90244-9.