Suppr超能文献

评价哈瑙公式在确定髁突侧向运动引导方面的应用:一项临床研究

Evaluation of Hanau's formula in determination of lateral condylar guidance: A clinical research study.

作者信息

Bhawsar Sanjay Vasant, Marathe Ashlesha Subhash, Ansari Sadekh Abdul

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Prosthodontics, SMBT Dental College and Hospital, Sangamner, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015 Oct-Dec;15(4):326-30. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.161566.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The accuracy and reliability of the methods used for programming the semi-adjustable articulators determine the accuracy in occlusion. The current recommended average settings using the Hanau's formula commonly used by clinicians is questionable, and thus reassessment is needed. This study was carried out to evaluate and compare the lateral condylar guidance: (1) Using the Hanau's formula and the computerized jaw tracking device (Kinesiograph). (2) On the right and left sides using both these methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 20 completely edentulous patients (14 male and 6 females) within 40-60 years of age were selected. Jaw relation was recorded followed by face bow transfer. Extraoral Gothic arch tracing was recorded; three protrusive records were obtained and condylar guidance was calculated. Lateral condylar guidance was then calculated using Hanau's formula, followed by the computerized jaw tracking device. A comparative evaluation was done of the obtained values. The same investigator worked with each of the study participants for the purpose of standardization.

RESULTS

The lateral condylar guidance values obtained using the Hanau's formula ranged from 14 to 17° while those obtained using the computerized K7 jaw tracking device ranged from 8 to 40°. Bennett angle values, obtained using the jaw tracking device and Hanau's formula showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) using paired t-test (at 95% confidence interval). Bennett angle values of the right and left sides found using the Hanau's formula were almost similar. Difference in the Bennett angle values of the right and left sides were found using the jaw tracking device. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, dentist and dental technicians should consider reassessing the current recommended average settings and use of the Hanau's formula for programming the semi-adjustable articulators.

摘要

问题陈述

用于半可调牙合架编程的方法的准确性和可靠性决定了咬合的准确性。临床医生常用的根据哈瑙公式得出的当前推荐平均设置值得怀疑,因此需要重新评估。本研究旨在评估和比较侧向髁导斜度:(1)使用哈瑙公式和计算机化颌骨跟踪装置(运动描记仪)。(2)在左右两侧使用这两种方法。

材料与方法

共选取20例40 - 60岁的全口无牙患者(14例男性和6例女性)。记录颌关系,然后进行面弓转移。记录口外哥特式弓描记;获取三次前伸记录并计算髁导斜度。然后使用哈瑙公式计算侧向髁导斜度,接着使用计算机化颌骨跟踪装置进行计算。对获得的值进行比较评估。为了标准化,由同一名研究人员与每位研究参与者合作。

结果

使用哈瑙公式获得的侧向髁导斜度值范围为14°至17°,而使用计算机化K7颌骨跟踪装置获得的值范围为8°至40°。使用配对t检验(在95%置信区间),使用颌骨跟踪装置和哈瑙公式获得的 Bennett角值显示出统计学上的显著差异(P < 0.05)。使用哈瑙公式得出的左右两侧的Bennett角值几乎相似。使用颌骨跟踪装置发现左右两侧的Bennett角值存在差异。然而,这种差异在统计学上并不显著(P > 0.05)。

结论

基于研究结果,牙医和牙科技术人员应考虑重新评估当前推荐的平均设置以及使用哈瑙公式对半可调牙合架进行编程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7643/4762349/e799b2e80354/JIPS-15-326-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验