针对儿科实习生的儿童乘客安全培训：它有效吗？

Child Passenger Safety Training for Pediatric Interns: Does it Work?

作者信息

Morrissey Dina, Riese Alison, Violano Pina, Lapidus Garry, Baird Janette, Mello Michael J

机构信息

Research Associate, The Injury Prevention Center at Rhode Island Hospital, Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.

Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Assistant Professor of Medical Science, Section of Medical Education, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.

出版信息

R I Med J (2013). 2016 Mar 1;99(3):29-32.

PMID:26929969

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy of a child passenger safety (CPS) educational intervention on the CPS-related knowledge, attitude and anticipatory guidance behaviors of pediatric interns.

METHODS

All subjects were surveyed at baseline and 6 months. Intervention interns attended a CPS training module which included viewing an educational video, observing a car seat inspection appointment, hands-on practice and completion of a post-intervention survey.

RESULTS

All 16 intervention interns completed the initial survey, the intervention and the immediate-post questionnaire. Thirteen (81%) completed the 6-month follow-up. The baseline survey was completed by 27/40 (67%) of control interns, 28/40 (70%) submitted a follow-up. The proportion of intervention interns who self-reported giving CPS guidance at all well-child visits increased by 31.3% (95% CI 6.1,56.5%); the control group had no change. Similar results were seen with self-reported knowledge and attitude.

CONCLUSIONS

A CPS training module increases pediatric interns' knowledge, improves attitudes, and self-reported behaviors regarding CPS-related anticipatory guidance.

摘要

目的

评估儿童乘客安全（CPS）教育干预对儿科实习医生CPS相关知识、态度及预期指导行为的效果。

方法

在基线期和6个月时对所有受试者进行调查。干预组实习医生参加了一个CPS培训模块，内容包括观看教育视频、观摩汽车座椅检查预约、实际操作以及完成干预后调查问卷。

结果

所有16名干预组实习医生均完成了初始调查、干预及干预后即时问卷。13名（81%）完成了6个月随访。对照组27/40（67%）的实习医生完成了基线调查，28/40（70%）提交了随访结果。自我报告在所有健康儿童就诊时都提供CPS指导的干预组实习医生比例增加了31.3%（95%可信区间6.1,56.5%）；对照组无变化。自我报告的知识和态度方面也有类似结果。