Stoll Stefan, Breyer Philippa, Tonkin Jonathan D, Früh Denise, Haase Peter
Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Clamecystr. 12, 63571 Gelnhausen, and Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Clamecystr. 12, 63571 Gelnhausen, and Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; North Rhine-Westphalia State Agency for Nature, Environment and Consumer Protection (LANUV), Leibnizstraße 10, 45659 Recklinghausen, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 May 15;553:495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.126. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
Although most stream restoration projects succeed in improving hydromorphological habitat quality, the ecological quality of the stream communities often remains unaffected. We hypothesize that this is because stream communities are largely determined by environmental properties at a larger-than-local spatial scale. Using benthic invertebrate community data as well as hydromorphological habitat quality data from 1087 stream sites, we investigated the role of local- (i.e. 100 m reach) and regional-scale (i.e. 5 km ring centered on each reach) stream hydromorphological habitat quality (LQ and RQ, respectively) on benthic invertebrate communities. The analyses showed that RQ had a greater individual effect on communities than LQ, but the effects of RQ and LQ interacted. Where RQ was either good or poor, communities were exclusively determined by RQ. Only in areas of intermediate RQ, LQ determined communities. Metacommunity analysis helped to explain these findings. Species pools in poor RQ areas were most depauperated, resulting in insufficient propagule pressure for species establishment even at high LQ (e.g. restored) sites. Conversely, higher alpha diversity and an indication of lower beta dispersion signals at mass effects occurring in high RQ areas. That is, abundant neighboring populations may help to maintain populations even at sites with low LQ. The strongest segregation in species co-occurrence was detected at intermediate RQ levels, suggesting that communities are structured to the highest degree by a habitat/environmental gradient. From these results, we conclude that when restoring riverine habitats at the reach scale, restoration projects situated in intermediate RQ settings will likely be the most successful in enhancing the naturalness of local communities. With a careful choice of sites for reach-scale restoration in settings of intermediate RQ and a strategy that aims to expand areas of high RQ, the success of reach-scale restoration in promoting the ecological quality of communities can be greatly improved.
尽管大多数河流修复项目成功改善了水文形态栖息地质量,但河流群落的生态质量往往仍未受到影响。我们推测,这是因为河流群落很大程度上由大于局部空间尺度的环境属性决定。利用来自1087个河流站点的底栖无脊椎动物群落数据以及水文形态栖息地质量数据,我们研究了局部尺度(即100米河段)和区域尺度(即以每个河段为中心的5公里环形区域)的河流水文形态栖息地质量(分别为LQ和RQ)对底栖无脊椎动物群落的作用。分析表明,RQ对群落的个体影响大于LQ,但RQ和LQ的影响相互作用。当RQ良好或较差时,群落完全由RQ决定。只有在RQ中等的区域,LQ才决定群落。集合群落分析有助于解释这些发现。RQ较差区域的物种库最为贫乏,即使在LQ较高(如经修复)的站点,也导致物种建立的繁殖体压力不足。相反,在RQ较高区域发生的质量效应中,α多样性较高且β离散信号较低。也就是说,丰富的邻近种群甚至可能有助于维持LQ较低站点的种群。在RQ中等水平检测到物种共现中最强的隔离,这表明群落受栖息地/环境梯度结构化的程度最高。从这些结果中,我们得出结论,当在河段尺度恢复河流栖息地时,位于RQ中等环境中的恢复项目在增强当地群落自然性方面可能最为成功。通过在RQ中等环境中仔细选择河段尺度恢复的地点,并采取旨在扩大高RQ区域的策略,可以大大提高河段尺度恢复在促进群落生态质量方面的成功率。