Rogo K O, Ojwang S B, Stendahl U
East Afr Med J. 1989 Dec;66(12):844-50.
Almost 30 years after its introduction into the management of ovarian carcinoma, second-look laparotomy remains controversial. Although its supporters agree on its indications, there is a considerable number of conflicting reports on the actual benefits of the procedure. Diagnostic inaccuracy, invasiveness and expense are some of the reasons raised by opponents against its routine performance and their recommendations range from limited selective application to total avoidance. The role of second-look laparotomy is reviewed, with particular reference to developing countries where scarcity of resources must always be balanced against the need to provide the best care possible to the individual cancer patient. A management schedule for ovarian carcinoma, including second-look laparotomy, appropriate under these circumstances is given.
在被引入卵巢癌治疗近30年后,二次剖腹探查术仍存在争议。尽管其支持者对其适应症达成了共识,但关于该手术实际益处的报道却相当多且相互矛盾。诊断不准确、具有侵入性以及费用高昂是反对者提出的反对其常规施行的部分原因,他们的建议从有限的选择性应用到完全避免不等。本文回顾了二次剖腹探查术的作用,特别提及了发展中国家,在这些国家,资源稀缺必须始终与为个体癌症患者提供尽可能最佳治疗的需求相平衡。给出了在这些情况下适用的包括二次剖腹探查术在内的卵巢癌治疗方案。