Hustedt John, Canavati Sara E, Rang Chandary, Ashton Ruth A, Khim Nimol, Berne Laura, Kim Saorin, Sovannaroth Siv, Ly Po, Ménard Didier, Cox Jonathan, Meek Sylvia, Roca-Feltrer Arantxa
Malaria Consortium Cambodia, Phnom Penh Office, House #91, St. 95, Boeung Trabek, Chamcar Morn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Ratchawithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Malar J. 2016 Mar 1;15:132. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1191-z.
As momentum towards malaria elimination grows, strategies are being developed for scale-up in elimination settings. One prominent strategy, reactive case detection (RACD), involves screening and treating individuals living in close proximity to passively detected, or "index" cases. This study aims to use RACD to quantify Plasmodium parasitaemia in households of index cases, and identify risk factors for infection; these data could inform reactive screening approaches and identify target risk groups.
This study was conducted in the Western Cambodian province of Pailin between May 2013 and March 2014 among 440 households. Index participants/index cases (n = 270) and surrounding households (n = 110) were screened for Plasmodium infection with rapid diagnostic tests (RDT), microscopy and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Participants were interviewed to identify risk factors. A comparison group of 60 randomly-selected households was also screened, to compare infection levels of RACD and non-RACD households. In order to identify potential risk factors that would inform screening approaches and identify risk groups, multivariate logistic regression models were applied.
Nine infections were identified in households of index cases (RACD approach) through RDT screening of 1898 individuals (seven Plasmodium vivax, two Plasmodium falciparum); seven were afebrile. Seventeen infections were identified through PCR screening of 1596 individuals (15 P. vivax, and 22 % P. falciparum/P. vivax mixed infections). In the control group, 25 P. falciparum infections were identified through PCR screening of 237 individuals, and no P. vivax was found. Plasmodium falciparum infection was associated with fever (p = 0.013), being a member of a control household (p ≤ 0.001), having a history of malaria infection (p = 0.041), and sleeping without a mosquito net (p = 0.011). Significant predictors of P. vivax infection, as diagnosed by PCR, were fever (p = 0.058, borderline significant) and history of malaria infection (p ≤ 0.001).
This study found that RACD identified very few secondary infections when targeting index and neighbouring households for screening. The results suggest RACD is not appropriate, where exposure to malaria occurs away from the community, and there is a high level of treatment-seeking from the private sector. Piloting RACD in a range of transmission settings would help to identify the ideal environment for feasible and effective reactive screening methods.
随着消除疟疾的势头增强,正在制定扩大消除疟疾环境规模的策略。一种突出的策略,即被动病例检测(RACD),涉及对居住在被动检测到的“索引”病例附近的个人进行筛查和治疗。本研究旨在利用RACD对索引病例家庭中的疟原虫血症进行量化,并确定感染的危险因素;这些数据可为被动筛查方法提供参考,并确定目标风险群体。
本研究于2013年5月至2014年3月在柬埔寨西部的拜林省对440户家庭进行。使用快速诊断测试(RDT)、显微镜检查和实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)对索引参与者/索引病例(n = 270)及其周围家庭(n = 110)进行疟原虫感染筛查。对参与者进行访谈以确定危险因素。还对60户随机选择的家庭组成的对照组进行了筛查,以比较RACD家庭和非RACD家庭的感染水平。为了确定可为筛查方法提供参考并识别风险群体的潜在危险因素,应用了多变量逻辑回归模型。
通过对1898名个体进行RDT筛查,在索引病例家庭(RACD方法)中发现了9例感染(7例间日疟原虫,2例恶性疟原虫);7例无发热症状。通过对1596名个体进行PCR筛查,发现了17例感染(15例间日疟原虫,2例恶性疟原虫/间日疟原虫混合感染)。在对照组中,通过对237名个体进行PCR筛查,发现了25例恶性疟原虫感染,未发现间日疟原虫。恶性疟原虫感染与发热(p = 0.013)、是对照家庭的成员(p≤0.001)、有疟疾感染史(p = 0.041)以及无蚊帐睡眠(p = 0.011)有关。经PCR诊断,间日疟原虫感染的显著预测因素是发热(p = 0.058,临界显著)和疟疾感染史(p≤0.001)。
本研究发现,当以索引病例家庭及其邻近家庭为筛查目标时,RACD发现的二代感染极少。结果表明,在社区外存在疟疾暴露且私营部门寻求治疗的比例较高的情况下,RACD并不适用。在一系列传播环境中试点RACD将有助于确定可行且有效的被动筛查方法的理想环境。