Freda Nicolas M, Lipp Mitchell J
Dr. Freda is an Orthodontic Resident, New York University College of Dentistry; Dr. Lipp is Clinical Associate Professor and Director of Predoctoral Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, New York University College of Dentistry.
J Dent Educ. 2016 Mar;80(3):348-54.
Dental educators intend to promote integration of knowledge, skills, and values toward professional competence. Studies report that retrieval, in the form of testing, results in better learning with retention than traditional studying. The aim of this study was to evaluate test-enhanced experiences on demonstrations of competence in diagnosis and management of malocclusion and skeletal problems. The study participants were all third-year dental students (2011 N=88, 2012 N=74, 2013 N=91, 2014 N=85) at New York University College of Dentistry. The 2013 and 2014 groups received the test-enhanced method emphasizing formative assessments with written and dialogic delayed feedback, while the 2011 and 2012 groups received the traditional approach emphasizing lectures and classroom exercises. The students received six two-hour sessions, spaced one week apart. At the final session, a summative assessment consisting of the same four cases was administered. Students constructed a problem list, treatment objectives, and a treatment plan for each case, scored according to the same criteria. Grades were based on the number of cases without critical errors: A=0 critical errors on four cases, A-=0 critical errors on three cases, B+=0 critical errors on two cases, B=0 critical errors on one case, F=critical errors on four cases. Performance grades were categorized as high quality (B+, A-, A) and low quality (F, B). The results showed that the test-enhanced groups demonstrated statistically significant benefits at 95% confidence intervals compared to the traditional groups when comparing low- and high-quality grades. These performance trends support the continued use of the test-enhanced approach.
牙科教育工作者旨在促进知识、技能和价值观的整合,以实现专业能力。研究报告称,以测试形式进行的检索比传统学习能带来更好的学习效果和记忆保持。本研究的目的是评估测试强化体验对牙合畸形和骨骼问题诊断与管理能力表现的影响。研究参与者为纽约大学牙科学院的所有三年级牙科学生(2011年N = 88人,2012年N = 74人,2013年N = 91人,2014年N = 85人)。2013年和2014年的小组采用测试强化方法,强调形成性评估并提供书面和对话式延迟反馈,而2011年和2012年的小组采用传统方法,强调讲座和课堂练习。学生们接受了六次两小时的课程,课程间隔为一周。在最后一节课上,进行了由相同四个病例组成的总结性评估。学生们为每个病例构建问题清单、治疗目标和治疗计划,并根据相同标准进行评分。成绩基于无严重错误的病例数量:A = 四个病例均无严重错误,A- = 三个病例无严重错误,B+ = 两个病例无严重错误,B = 一个病例无严重错误,F = 四个病例均有严重错误。表现等级分为高质量(B+、A-、A)和低质量(F、B)。结果表明,与传统小组相比,在比较低质量和高质量等级时,测试强化小组在95%置信区间显示出统计学上的显著优势。这些表现趋势支持继续使用测试强化方法。