Muela Ribera Joan, Hausmann-Muela Susanna, Gryseels Charlotte, Peeters Grietens Koen
Departament d'Antropologia, Filosofia i Treball Social Medical Anthropology Research Centre (MARC), Rovira i Virgili University, Avinguda de Catalunya 85, 43002, Tarragona, Spain.
Partners for Applied Social Sciences (PASS) International, Tessenderlo, Belgium.
Malar J. 2016 Mar 2;15:136. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1193-x.
Patients' adherence to malaria treatment is a key issue in malaria control and elimination efforts. Previous studies have reported on problems with adherence to anti-malarials, which in part can be related to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of anti-malarials. However, there has been a relative inattention to the cultural and social aspects of these anti-malarial side-effects and, more broadly, to how cultural representations of body functions may affect people's behaviour. In this article, an in-depth analysis is presented of the cultural logics underlying local interpretations of adverse drug reactions to anti-malarials in the Peruvian Amazon.
Ethnographic fieldwork was carried out during two periods of 3 months in 2007 and 2008. Fieldwork was carried out in 10 communities in the department of Loreto, the administrative area corresponding to the Peruvian Amazon. Thirty in-depth interviews of key and general informants, focusing on perceived adverse anti-malarial drug reactions, were carried out in Spanish, recorded, transcribed and analysed.
Informants reported surprisingly elevated problems of adverse drug reactions. Frequent statements about medication that "shocked", "cut the blood" or provoked "allergic reactions" are difficult to interpret from a biomedical perspective, and only make when considering the underlying cultural logics. The logic of maintaining a 'temperate' physical and moral balance by avoiding excesses of 'hot' or 'cold' or sudden changes of 'body heat' can explain the locally constructed adverse drug reactions to anti-malarials.
Adherence is a continuous process during which the patient evaluates and re-evaluates the course of his illness and the perceived benefits and risks of the treatment. What counts are the processes, the interpretations and the logics which underlie the decisions to adhere to or to abandon treatment. Adherence can only be adequately addressed if such interpretations are understood and taken into account.
患者对疟疾治疗的依从性是疟疾控制和消除工作中的关键问题。先前的研究报告了抗疟药依从性方面的问题,部分原因可能与抗疟药的药物不良反应(ADR)有关。然而,人们相对忽视了这些抗疟药副作用的文化和社会层面,更广泛地说,忽视了身体功能的文化表征如何影响人们的行为。本文深入分析了秘鲁亚马逊地区当地人对抗疟药药物不良反应的解释背后的文化逻辑。
2007年和2008年分两个阶段进行了为期3个月的人种志田野调查。田野调查在洛雷托省的10个社区开展,该省是秘鲁亚马逊地区对应的行政区。用西班牙语对关键信息提供者和普通信息提供者进行了30次深入访谈,重点是感知到的抗疟药药物不良反应,访谈进行了录音、转录和分析。
信息提供者报告的药物不良反应问题惊人地多。关于药物“令人震惊”、“伤了血”或引发“过敏反应”的频繁表述,从生物医学角度很难解释,只有考虑到潜在的文化逻辑才能理解。通过避免“热"或“冷”的过度或“体温”的突然变化来维持“适度”的身体和道德平衡的逻辑,可以解释当地人对抗疟药产生的药物不良反应。
依从性是一个持续的过程,在此过程中患者评估并重新评估自己的病程以及治疗的感知益处和风险。重要的是依从或放弃治疗决定背后的过程、解释和逻辑。只有理解并考虑到这些解释,才能充分解决依从性问题。