Socio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Science, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Malar J. 2021 Sep 17;20(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03903-y.
Despite significant strides made in reducing malaria morbidity and mortality in the Greater Mekong Subregion, malaria transmission continues amongst the most 'hard-to-reach', such as forest-goers and mobile and migrant populations, who face access obstacles to malaria diagnosis and treatment. As such, regional malaria elimination strategies endeavour to incorporate the private sector and local communities in improving surveillance and detection of the last malaria cases in remote forested areas. The question remains, however, whether such strategies can reach these hard-to-reach populations and effectively reduce their disproportionate burden of malaria. This paper evaluates the strategy of community and private sector engagement in a malaria elimination project in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia.
Ethnographic research, incorporating in-depth interviews, participant observations with informal discussions, and group discussions were conducted in Bu Gia Map commune, Binh Phuc province of Vietnam; in Phouvong district, Attapeu province of Laos; and, in nine newly established and informal communities in the provinces of Mondul Kiri, Steung Treng, Kratie, Kampong Thom, and Prah Vihear of Cambodia.
Different types of factors limited or enhanced the effectiveness of the participatory approaches in the different settings. In Vietnam, inter-ethnic tensions and sensitivity around forest-work negatively affected local population's health-seeking behaviour and consequent uptake of malaria testing and treatment. In Laos, the location of the project collaborative pharmacies in the district-centre were a mismatch for reaching hard-to-reach populations in remote villages. In Cambodia, the strategy of recruiting community malaria-workers, elected by the community members, did manage to reach the remote forested areas where people visited or stayed.
'Hard-to-reach' populations remain hard to reach without proper research identifying the socio-economic-political environment and the key dynamics determining uptake in involved communities and populations. Solid implementation research with a strong ethnographic component is required to tailor malaria elimination strategies to local contexts.
尽管大湄公河次区域在降低疟疾发病率和死亡率方面取得了重大进展,但在最难以到达的人群中,如森林居民和流动及移民人群中,疟疾仍在传播,他们在疟疾诊断和治疗方面面临着获得途径的障碍。因此,区域消除疟疾战略努力将私营部门和地方社区纳入其中,以改善对偏远森林地区最后几例疟疾病例的监测和发现。然而,问题仍然是这些战略是否能够接触到这些难以到达的人群,并有效减轻他们不成比例的疟疾负担。本文评估了在越南、老挝和柬埔寨实施的社区和私营部门参与消除疟疾项目的策略。
在越南平福省的 Bu Gia Map 公社;老挝阿塔佩乌省的 Phouvong 区;以及柬埔寨蒙多基里省、上丁省、桔井省、磅通省和柏威夏省的九个新成立的非正式社区,进行了民族志研究,包括深入访谈、非正式讨论的参与式观察和小组讨论。
在不同的环境中,不同类型的因素限制或增强了参与式方法的有效性。在越南,族裔间紧张关系和对森林工作的敏感性对当地人口的寻医行为和随后接受疟疾检测和治疗产生了负面影响。在老挝,项目合作药店位于区中心,这与偏远村庄难以到达的人群不匹配。在柬埔寨,通过社区成员选举招募社区疟疾工作者的策略确实设法到达了人们访问或逗留的偏远森林地区。
如果没有适当的研究来确定参与社区和人群的社会经济政治环境以及决定参与的关键动态,那么“难以到达”的人群仍然难以到达。需要进行扎实的实施研究,并具有强大的民族志组成部分,以便根据当地情况调整消除疟疾战略。