Witham Claire L, Fisher Karen M, Edgley Steve A, Baker Stuart N
Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and.
Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 3DY, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2016 Mar 2;36(9):2605-16. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4055-15.2016.
Previous anatomical work in primates has suggested that only corticospinal axons originating in caudal primary motor cortex ("new M1") and area 3a make monosynaptic cortico-motoneuronal connections with limb motoneurons. By contrast, the more rostral "old M1" is proposed to control motoneurons disynaptically via spinal interneurons. In six macaque monkeys, we examined the effects from focal stimulation within old and new M1 and area 3a on 135 antidromically identified motoneurons projecting to the upper limb. EPSPs with segmental latency shorter than 1.2 ms were classified as definitively monosynaptic; these were seen only after stimulation within new M1 or at the new M1/3a border (incidence 6.6% and 1.3%, respectively; total n = 27). However, most responses had longer latencies. Using measures of the response facilitation after a second stimulus compared with the first, and the reduction in response latency after a third stimulus compared with the first, we classified these late responses as likely mediated by either long-latency monosynaptic (n = 108) or non-monosynaptic linkages (n = 108). Both old and new M1 generated putative long-latency monosynaptic and non-monosynaptic effects; the majority of responses from area 3a were non-monosynaptic. Both types of responses from new M1 had significantly greater amplitude than those from old M1. We suggest that slowly conducting corticospinal fibers from old M1 generate weak late monosynaptic effects in motoneurons. These may represent a stage in control of primate motoneurons by the cortex intermediate between disynaptic output via an interposed interneuron seen in nonprimates and the fast direct monosynaptic connections present in new M1.
The corticospinal tract in Old World primates makes monosynaptic connections to motoneurons; previous anatomical work suggests that these connections come only from corticospinal tract (CST) neurons in the subdivision of primary motor cortex within the central sulcus ("new M1") and area 3a. Here, we show using electrophysiology that cortico-motoneuronal connections from fast conducting CST fibers are indeed made exclusively from new M1 and its border with 3a. However, we also show that all parts of M1 and 3a have cortico-motoneuronal connections over more slowly conducting CST axons, as well as exert disynaptic effects on motoneurons via interposed interneurons. Differences between old and new M1 are thus more subtle than previously thought.
先前对灵长类动物的解剖学研究表明,只有起源于尾侧初级运动皮层(“新M1”)和3a区的皮质脊髓轴突与肢体运动神经元形成单突触皮质-运动神经元连接。相比之下,更靠前的“旧M1”被认为是通过脊髓中间神经元以双突触方式控制运动神经元。在六只猕猴中,我们研究了旧M1、新M1和3a区内局部刺激对135个经逆向鉴定的投射至上肢的运动神经元的影响。节段潜伏期短于1.2毫秒的兴奋性突触后电位(EPSP)被明确归类为单突触;这些仅在新M1内或新M1/3a边界处刺激后出现(发生率分别为6.6%和1.3%;总数n = 27)。然而,大多数反应的潜伏期更长。通过比较第二次刺激与第一次刺激后反应的易化程度,以及第三次刺激与第一次刺激后反应潜伏期的缩短情况,我们将这些晚期反应归类为可能由长潜伏期单突触(n = 108)或非单突触联系介导(n = 108)。旧M1和新M1均产生了假定的长潜伏期单突触和非单突触效应;3a区的大多数反应为非单突触。新M1的两种反应类型的幅度均显著大于旧M1。我们认为,来自旧M1的传导速度较慢的皮质脊髓纤维在运动神经元中产生较弱的晚期单突触效应。这些可能代表了灵长类动物皮层控制运动神经元的一个阶段,介于非灵长类动物中通过中间中间神经元的双突触输出和新M1中存在的快速直接单突触连接之间。
旧世界灵长类动物的皮质脊髓束与运动神经元形成单突触连接;先前的解剖学研究表明,这些连接仅来自中央沟内初级运动皮层细分区域(“新M1”)和3a区的皮质脊髓束(CST)神经元。在这里,我们通过电生理学表明,快速传导的CST纤维的皮质-运动神经元连接确实仅来自新M1及其与3a区的边界。然而,我们还表明,M1和3a的所有部分都通过传导速度更慢的CST轴突与运动神经元形成皮质-运动神经元连接,并且还通过中间中间神经元对运动神经元施加双突触效应。因此,旧M1和新M1之间的差异比以前认为的更为微妙。