Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
J Neurophysiol. 2014 May;111(10):2001-16. doi: 10.1152/jn.00935.2012. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
Neurons in the spinal cord and motor cortex (M1) are partially phase-locked to cycles of physiological tremor, but with opposite phases. Convergence of spinal and cortical activity onto motoneurons may thus produce phase cancellation and a reduction in tremor amplitude. The mechanisms underlying this phase difference are unknown. We investigated coherence between spinal and M1 activity with sensory input. In two anesthetized monkeys, we electrically stimulated the medial, ulnar, deep radial, and superficial radial nerves; stimuli were timed as independent Poisson processes (rate 10 Hz). Single units were recorded from M1 (147 cells) or cervical spinal cord (61 cells). Ninety M1 cells were antidromically identified as pyramidal tract neurons (PTNs); M1 neurons were additionally classified according to M1 subdivision (rostral/caudal, M1r/c). Spike-stimulus coherence analysis revealed significant coupling over a broad range of frequencies, with the strongest coherence at <50 Hz. Delays implied by the slope of the coherence phase-frequency relationship were greater than the response onset latency, reflecting the importance of late response components for the transmission of oscillatory inputs. The spike-stimulus coherence phase over the 6-13 Hz physiological tremor band differed significantly between M1 and spinal cells (phase differences relative to the cord of 2.72 ± 0.29 and 1.72 ± 0.37 radians for PTNs from M1c and M1r, respectively). We conclude that different phases of the response to peripheral input could partially underlie antiphase M1 and spinal cord activity during motor behavior. The coordinated action of spinal and cortical feedback will act to reduce tremulous oscillations, possibly improving the overall stability and precision of motor control.
脊髓和运动皮层(M1)中的神经元与生理震颤的周期部分锁定,但相位相反。因此,脊髓和皮质活动的收敛可能导致相位抵消和震颤幅度减小。这种相位差的机制尚不清楚。我们研究了脊髓和 M1 活动与感觉输入之间的相干性。在两只麻醉的猴子中,我们电刺激正中神经、尺神经、深桡神经和浅桡神经;刺激作为独立的泊松过程(频率 10 Hz)进行定时。从 M1(147 个细胞)或颈脊髓(61 个细胞)记录单个单元。90 个 M1 细胞被逆行鉴定为锥体束神经元(PTN);M1 神经元根据 M1 细分(头/尾,M1r/c)进一步分类。尖峰-刺激相干性分析显示在较宽的频率范围内存在显著的耦合,最强的相干性在<50 Hz 以下。相干相位-频率关系斜率暗示的延迟大于响应起始潜伏期,反映了晚期响应成分对振荡输入传输的重要性。6-13 Hz 生理震颤带的尖峰-刺激相干相位在 M1 和脊髓细胞之间差异显著(相对于脊髓的相位差分别为 M1c 和 M1r 中的 PTN 的 2.72±0.29 和 1.72±0.37 弧度)。我们得出结论,对周围输入的反应的不同相位可能部分解释了运动行为期间 M1 和脊髓活动的反相。脊髓和皮质反馈的协调作用将起到减少震颤性波动的作用,可能会提高运动控制的整体稳定性和精度。