• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向初级保健提供者有效传达结直肠癌筛查信息:州、部落或领地综合癌症控制联盟的应用

Effectively Communicating Colorectal Cancer Screening Information to Primary Care Providers: Application for State, Tribe or Territory Comprehensive Cancer Control Coalitions.

作者信息

Redmond Jennifer, Vanderpool Robin, McClung Rebecca

机构信息

Kentucky Cancer Consortium, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40504.

Department of Health Behavior, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, 40504.

出版信息

Am J Health Educ. 2012;43(4):194-201. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2012.10599235. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1080/19325037.2012.10599235
PMID:26937262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4770578/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients are more likely to be screened for colorectal cancer if it is recommended by a health care provider. Therefore, it is imperative that providers have access to the latest screening guidelines.

PURPOSE

This practice-based project sought to identify Kentucky primary care providers' preferred sources and methods of receiving colorectal cancer information to improve state comprehensive cancer control provider outreach initiatives.

METHODS

Four focus groups were conducted with primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. Discussion included preferred sources and methods of receiving updated screening guidelines, legislation, and statewide public awareness campaign materials.

RESULTS

Providers ( = 17) identified their preferred methods for receiving colorectal cancer information as: routine emails from trusted sources (colleagues, professional societies and research, and advocacy agencies), scientific journals, existing conferences, and the media.

DISCUSSION

When delivering colorectal cancer information to primary care providers, multiple approaches are needed. An ideal partner for dissemination of information is state comprehensive cancer control coalitions, considering their prioritization of colorectal cancer screening and existing networks of partners who were identified as trusted sources.

TRANSLATION TO HEALTH EDUCATION PRACTICE

Assessment of primary care providers' preferred methods and sources of receiving colorectal cancer information informs strategies for practice among comprehensive cancer control coalitions.

摘要

背景

如果医疗服务提供者建议进行结直肠癌筛查,患者更有可能接受筛查。因此,提供者必须能够获取最新的筛查指南。

目的

这个基于实践的项目旨在确定肯塔基州初级医疗服务提供者获取结直肠癌信息的首选来源和方法,以改进该州综合癌症控制提供者的外展倡议。

方法

与初级保健医生、执业护士和医师助理进行了四个焦点小组讨论。讨论内容包括获取最新筛查指南、立法和全州公众意识宣传活动材料的首选来源和方法。

结果

提供者(n = 17)确定他们获取结直肠癌信息的首选方法为:来自可信来源(同事、专业协会和研究机构以及宣传机构)的常规电子邮件、科学期刊、现有会议和媒体。

讨论

在向初级医疗服务提供者提供结直肠癌信息时,需要多种方法。考虑到州综合癌症控制联盟对结直肠癌筛查的优先重视以及被确定为可信来源的现有合作伙伴网络,信息传播的理想合作伙伴是州综合癌症控制联盟。

对健康教育实践的启示

评估初级医疗服务提供者获取结直肠癌信息的首选方法和来源,为综合癌症控制联盟的实践策略提供了参考。

相似文献

1
Effectively Communicating Colorectal Cancer Screening Information to Primary Care Providers: Application for State, Tribe or Territory Comprehensive Cancer Control Coalitions.向初级保健提供者有效传达结直肠癌筛查信息:州、部落或领地综合癌症控制联盟的应用
Am J Health Educ. 2012;43(4):194-201. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2012.10599235. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
2
Primary care providers' sources and preferences for cognitive health information in the United States.美国初级保健提供者获取认知健康信息的来源和偏好。
Health Promot Int. 2010 Dec;25(4):464-73. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq043. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
3
Accuracy of pediatric primary care providers' screening and referral for early childhood caries.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿龋齿的筛查及转诊的准确性。
Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5):E82-2. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.e82.
4
Physicians' use of nonphysician healthcare providers for colorectal cancer screening.医生在结直肠癌筛查中对非医生医疗服务提供者的使用情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Oct;25(3):179-86. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00203-4.
5
Testing for Chlamydia and sexual history taking in adolescent females: results from a statewide survey of Colorado primary care providers.科罗拉多州初级保健提供者全州范围调查中青少年女性衣原体检测及性史询问结果
Pediatrics. 2000 Sep;106(3):E32. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.3.e32.
6
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
7
The practices and attitudes of primary care nurse practitioners and physician assistants with respect to colorectal cancer screening.初级护理执业护士和医师助理在结直肠癌筛查方面的做法和态度。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov;95(11):3259-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03262.x.
8
Missed cancer screening opportunities among older women: A provider survey.老年女性错过癌症筛查机会:一项医疗服务提供者调查。
Cancer Pract. 1998 Nov-Dec;6(6):325-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.006006325.x.
9
Colorectal cancer screening practices of primary care providers: results of a national survey in Malaysia.基层医疗服务提供者的结直肠癌筛查实践:马来西亚一项全国性调查的结果
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(6):2901-4. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.6.2901.
10
A survey-based study of Zika virus communication preferences among pregnant women in Georgia, United States.一项基于调查的研究,探讨了美国佐治亚州孕妇对寨卡病毒传播偏好的看法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 26;17(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1516-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Game-theoretic link relevance indexing on genome-wide expression dataset identifies putative salient genes with potential etiological and diapeutics role in colorectal cancer.基于全基因组表达数据集的博弈论链接相关性索引确定了具有潜在病因学和治疗作用的结直肠癌潜在显著基因。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 4;12(1):13409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17266-0.
2
Role of Using Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Chemoprevention of Colon Cancer in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.使用非甾体类抗炎药在炎症性肠病患者结肠癌化学预防中的作用。
Cureus. 2020 May 22;12(5):e8240. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8240.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive cancer control programs and coalitions: partnering to launch successful colorectal cancer screening initiatives.综合性癌症控制计划和联盟:合作开展成功的结直肠癌筛查计划。
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Dec;21(12):2023-31. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9664-9. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
2
Colonoscopy vs sigmoidoscopy screening: getting it right.结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查筛查:做对它。
JAMA. 2010 Jul 28;304(4):461-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1001.
3
Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.单次乙状结肠镜筛查预防结直肠癌:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2010 May 8;375(9726):1624-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60551-X. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
4
Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.系统评价:提高结直肠癌筛查的使用和质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):668-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00239. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
5
NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.美国国立卫生研究院科学现状会议声明:提高结直肠癌筛查的利用率和质量。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Feb 4;27(1):1-31.
6
Provider recommendation for colorectal cancer screening: examining the role of patients' socioeconomic status and health insurance.医疗机构推荐进行结直肠癌筛查:考察患者社会经济地位和医疗保险的作用。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;33(3-4):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2009.07.011. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
7
Professional medical associations and their relationships with industry: a proposal for controlling conflict of interest.专业医学协会及其与行业的关系:关于控制利益冲突的提议。
JAMA. 2009 Apr 1;301(13):1367-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.407.
8
Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.筛查结肠镜检查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的影响。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jul;7(7):770-5; quiz 711. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.030. Epub 2009 Jan 11.
9
American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].美国胃肠病学会2009年结直肠癌筛查指南[修订版]
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.104. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
10
Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.《2008年结直肠癌和腺瘤性息肉早期检测的筛查与监测:美国癌症协会、美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组及美国放射学会联合指南》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 May-Jun;58(3):130-60. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0018. Epub 2008 Mar 5.