• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于衡量物理治疗师跨专业实践的新工具的验证

Validation of a New Tool to Measure Physiotherapists' Interprofessional Practices.

作者信息

Perreault Kadija, Dionne Clermont E, Rossignol Michel, Morin Diane

机构信息

Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, CHU de Québec Research Center, 1050 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec City, QC G1S 4L8, Canada. Tel 418-682-7511 x4675, fax 418-682-7949.

出版信息

J Allied Health. 2016 Spring;45(1):14-9.

PMID:26937877
Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration is recommended in health systems everywhere, but research on its measurement is needed. This psychometric study assessed the construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the Intensity of Interprofessional Practices Questionnaire for Private-Sector Physiotherapists (IIPQ-PT). A random sample of 303 physiotherapists (PTs) completed the 12-item questionnaire, and a subsample of 103 completed it a second time 2 weeks later. Exploratory factor analyses revealed a one-factor solution for the instrument. IIPQ-PT scores showed respectively fair and moderate relationships with the percentage of low back pain clients for whom PTs reported interactions with other professionals (0.30; 95% CI 0.19-0.40; p<0.001) and perceived degree of interactions (0.58; 95% CI 0.50-0.65; p<0.001). The IIPQ-PT had high internal consistency (Cronbach's a= 0.86; 95% CI 0.83-0.88) and good test-retest reliability (ICC=0.69; 95% CI 0.57-0.78). The minimum detectable difference for a 95% CI was 2.52. Although further study of this instrument is warranted, our results are promising for its future use. The IIPQ-PT may prove useful to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aiming to improve interprofessional practices and to measure the effects of such practices on service users, providers, and the health system.

摘要

各地卫生系统都建议开展跨专业协作,但仍需要对其进行测量的研究。这项心理测量学研究评估了《私营部门物理治疗师跨专业实践强度问卷》(IIPQ-PT)的结构效度、内部一致性和重测信度。303名物理治疗师的随机样本完成了这份包含12个条目的问卷,103名的子样本在两周后再次完成了问卷。探索性因素分析揭示了该工具的单因素解决方案。IIPQ-PT得分与物理治疗师报告与其他专业人员互动的腰痛患者百分比(0.30;95%可信区间0.19 - 0.40;p<0.001)以及感知到的互动程度(0.58;95%可信区间0.50 - 0.65;p<0.001)分别呈现出中等和较高的相关性。IIPQ-PT具有较高的内部一致性(克朗巴赫α系数=0.86;95%可信区间0.83 - 0.88)和良好的重测信度(组内相关系数ICC=0.69;95%可信区间0.57 - 0.78)。95%可信区间的最小可检测差异为2.52。尽管有必要对该工具进行进一步研究,但我们的结果对其未来应用很有前景。IIPQ-PT可能有助于评估旨在改善跨专业实践的干预措施的有效性,并衡量此类实践对服务使用者、提供者和卫生系统的影响。

相似文献

1
Validation of a New Tool to Measure Physiotherapists' Interprofessional Practices.一种用于衡量物理治疗师跨专业实践的新工具的验证
J Allied Health. 2016 Spring;45(1):14-9.
2
Interprofessional practices of physiotherapists working with adults with low back pain in Québec's private sector: results of a qualitative study.魁北克私营部门中与成人腰痛患者合作的物理治疗师的跨专业实践:一项定性研究的结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 May 17;15:160. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-160.
3
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Hebrew version of the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale.医疗服务提供者疼痛与功能障碍关系量表希伯来语版本的翻译及心理测量学评估
Physiother Res Int. 2019 Jan;24(1):e1759. doi: 10.1002/pri.1759. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
4
Investigation of four self-report instruments (FABT, TSK-HC, Back-PAQ, HC-PAIRS) to measure healthcare practitioners' attitudes and beliefs toward low back pain: Reliability, convergent validity and survey of New Zealand osteopaths and manipulative physiotherapists.四种自我报告工具(FABT、TSK-HC、Back-PAQ、HC-PAIRS)用于测量医疗保健从业者对腰痛的态度和信念的调查:可靠性、聚合效度以及对新西兰整骨疗法师和手法物理治疗师的调查。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Dec;32:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
What are private sector physiotherapists' perceptions regarding interprofessional and intraprofessional work for managing low back pain?私营部门的物理治疗师对跨专业和专业内协作管理腰痛工作有何看法?
J Interprof Care. 2018 Jul;32(4):525-528. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1451829. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
6
Readiness to change for interprofessional collaboration in healthcare: Development and validation of a theory-based instrument.医疗保健领域跨专业协作的变革意愿:一种基于理论的工具的开发与验证
J Interprof Care. 2018 Sep;32(5):539-548. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1448371. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists: Dimensionality and Internal Consistency of the Norwegian Version.物理治疗师疼痛态度与信念量表:挪威语版本的维度及内部一致性
Physiother Res Int. 2017 Oct;22(4). doi: 10.1002/pri.1670. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
Development and initial validation of the interprofessional team learning profiling questionnaire.跨专业团队学习概况调查问卷的编制与初步验证
J Interprof Care. 2016 May;30(3):278-87. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1141188.
9
The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists: psychometric properties of the German version.物理治疗师疼痛态度与信念量表:德文版的心理测量特性
Clin Rehabil. 2008 Jun;22(6):564-75. doi: 10.1177/0269215508087485.
10
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter-Professional Practices of Private-Sector Physiotherapists for Low Back Pain Management: Who, How, and When?私营部门物理治疗师管理腰痛的跨专业实践:何人、如何以及何时?
Physiother Can. 2016;68(4):323-334. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2015-37.