Zhang Guo-Qiang, Hu Hua-Jian, Liu Chuan-Yang, Shakya Shristi, Li Zhong-Yue
From the Department of Gastroenterology (G-QZ, H-JH, SS, Z-YL) and Department of Nephrology (C-YL), Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing International Science and Technology Cooperation Center for Child Development and Disorders, Key Laboratory of Pediatrics in Chongqing, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(8):e2581. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002581.
The effect of probiotics on late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm neonates remains controversial. The authors systematically reviewed the literature to investigate whether enteral probiotic supplementation reduced the risk of LOS in preterm neonates in neonatal intensive care units.PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effect of probiotics in preterm neonates. The primary outcome was culture-proven bacterial and/or fungal sepsis. The Mantel-Haenszel method with random-effects model was used to calculate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Twenty-seven trials were included in our review, and 25 trials involving 6104 preterm neonates were statistically analyzed. Pooled analysis indicated that enteral probiotic supplementation significantly reduced the risk of any sepsis (25 RCTs; RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94; I = 26%), bacterial sepsis (11 RCTs; RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95; I = 0%), and fungal sepsis (6 RCTs; RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.78; I = 0%). This beneficial effect remains in very low birth weight infants (<1500 g) (19 RCTs; RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.97; I = 18%), but not in extremely low birth weight infants (<1000 g) (3 RCTs; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.45-1.19; I = 53%). All the included trials reported no systemic infection caused by the supplemental probiotic organisms.Current evidence indicates that probiotic supplementation is safe, and effective in reducing the risk of LOS in preterm neonates in neonatal intensive care units. Further studies are needed to address the optimal probiotic organism, dosing, timing, and duration. High-quality and adequately powered RCTs regarding the efficacy and safety of the use of probiotics in extremely low birth weight infants are still warranted.
益生菌对早产儿晚发性败血症(LOS)的影响仍存在争议。作者系统回顾了文献,以调查在新生儿重症监护病房中,肠内补充益生菌是否能降低早产儿患LOS的风险。系统检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,以查找关于益生菌对早产儿影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是经培养证实的细菌和/或真菌败血症。采用随机效应模型的Mantel-Haenszel方法计算合并相对风险(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。我们的综述纳入了27项试验,对其中涉及6104例早产儿的25项试验进行了统计分析。汇总分析表明,肠内补充益生菌显著降低了任何败血症(25项RCT;RR 0.83,95% CI 0.73 - 0.94;I=26%)、细菌败血症(11项RCT;RR 0.82,95% CI 0.71 - 0.95;I=0%)和真菌败血症(6项RCT;RR 0.57,95% CI 0.41 - 0.78;I=0%)的风险。这种有益效果在极低出生体重儿(<1500g)中仍然存在(19项RCT;RR 0.86,95% CI 0.75 - 0.97;I=18%),但在超低出生体重儿(<1000g)中不存在(3项RCT;RR 0.73,95% CI 0.45 - 1.19;I=53%)。所有纳入的试验均报告补充的益生菌未引起全身感染。目前的证据表明,补充益生菌是安全的,并且在降低新生儿重症监护病房中早产儿患LOS的风险方面是有效的。需要进一步研究以确定最佳的益生菌种类、剂量、给药时间和持续时间。关于在超低出生体重儿中使用益生菌的疗效和安全性方面,仍需要高质量且有足够样本量的RCT。