Onda Yoshiko, Nishimura Rimei, Morimoto Aya, Sano Hironari, Utsunomiya Kazunori, Tajima Naoko
Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 3;11(3):e0150720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150720. eCollection 2016.
To follow up Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes for a maximum of 40 years to examine when they transitioned from pediatric care to adult care and to explore whether the attending physician, i.e., pediatrician or internist, was associated with prognosis.
Participants consisted of 1,299 patients who had been diagnosed as having type 1 diabetes at less than 15 years old between 1965 and 1979 identified through two nationwide surveys. Patients were classified as having received either pediatric care or adult care at the age of 15 and 30, and were compared for differences in mortality associated with the attending physician.
The attending physicians were confirmed for a total of 1,093 patients at the age of 15. Of these patients, 43.8% and 40.3% received pediatric care and adult care, respectively. Of the 569 patients receiving pediatric care, 74.2%, 56.6%, 53.4%, and 51.3% continued with pediatric care at 20, 30, 40, and 50 years old, respectively. The attending physicians (pediatrician or internist) at the age of 15 and 30 had no significant impact on their survival (P = 0. 892, 0.411, respectively).
More than half of the patients who had received pediatric care at the age of 15 continued to receive pediatric care even after the age of 30, suggesting that their transition was far from smooth, while the attending physician at the age of both 15 and 30 was not a prognostic factor for mortality. Thus, the timing for transition to adult care in these patients has no relationship with mortality in Japan.
对日本1型糖尿病患者进行最长40年的随访,以研究他们从儿科护理过渡到成人护理的时间,并探讨主治医生(即儿科医生或内科医生)是否与预后相关。
参与者包括通过两项全国性调查确定的1299例在1965年至1979年间15岁之前被诊断为1型糖尿病的患者。患者在15岁和30岁时被分类为接受儿科护理或成人护理,并比较与主治医生相关的死亡率差异。
在15岁时共确认了1093例患者的主治医生。其中,分别有43.8%和40.3%的患者接受儿科护理和成人护理。在569例接受儿科护理的患者中,分别有74.2%、56.6%、53.4%和51.3%在20岁、30岁、40岁和50岁时继续接受儿科护理。15岁和30岁时的主治医生(儿科医生或内科医生)对其生存没有显著影响(P分别为0.892和0.411)。
15岁时接受儿科护理的患者中,超过一半在30岁后仍继续接受儿科护理,这表明他们的过渡并不顺利,而15岁和30岁时的主治医生均不是死亡率的预后因素。因此,在日本,这些患者向成人护理过渡的时间与死亡率无关。