Sifris Ronli
J Law Med. 2015 Dec;23(2):365-77.
Arguments against commercial surrogacy frequently focus on the rights of the surrogate. For-example, those opposed to commercial surrogacy often argue that surrogacy arrangements amount to the exploitation of women and the commodification of their wombs. Phrased in the language of rights, such arguments draw on the right to be free from degrading treatment and the right to be free from discrimination. In contrast, those who support commercial surrogacy refute the arguments relating to exploitation and commodification and cite the right to work and more commonly the right to privacy/autonomy as the key rights in question. This article focuses on the human right to autonomy and interrogates whether prohibitions on commercial surrogacy violate the right of a woman to choose to be a surrogate.
反对商业代孕的观点常常聚焦于代孕女性的权利。例如，那些反对商业代孕的人经常争辩说，代孕安排等同于对女性的剥削以及将她们的子宫商品化。用权利的语言表述，此类观点援引了免受有辱人格待遇的权利以及免受歧视的权利。相比之下，支持商业代孕的人反驳了与剥削和商品化相关的观点，并将工作权以及更常见的隐私权/自主权视为关键的相关权利。本文聚焦于自主的人权，并探究禁止商业代孕是否侵犯了女性选择成为代孕者的权利。
