Ahmad Sheikh Zahoor, Rajanbabu Anupama, Vijaykumar D K, Haji Altaf Gauhar, Pavithran K
Department of Surgical Oncology, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.
South Asian J Cancer. 2015 Jul-Sep;4(3):107-10. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.173171.
The objective was to compare perioperative morbidity and mortality of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treated with either of the two treatment approaches; neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking versus upfront surgery.
Prospective comparative observational study.
In total, 51 patients were included in the study. All patients with diagnosed advanced EOC (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IIIC and IV) presenting for the 1(st) time were included in the study.
Patients were either operated upfront (n = 19) if deemed operable or were subjected to NACT followed by interval debulking (n = 32).
Intra- and postoperative morbidity and mortality were the primary outcome measures.
Patients with interval cytoreduction were noted to have significantly lesser operative time, blood loss, and extent of surgery. Their discharge time was also significantly earlier. However, they did not differ from the other group vis. a vis. postoperative complications or mortality.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy although has a positive impact on various intraoperative adverse events, fails to show any impact on immediate postoperative negative outcomes.
本研究旨在比较采用两种治疗方法之一治疗的晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者的围手术期发病率和死亡率;新辅助化疗(NACT)后行间隔减瘤术与直接手术。
前瞻性比较观察性研究。
本研究共纳入51例患者。所有首次诊断为晚期EOC(国际妇产科联盟IIIC和IV期)的患者均纳入研究。
如果认为可手术,患者直接接受手术(n = 19),或先接受NACT,然后行间隔减瘤术(n = 32)。
术中和术后发病率及死亡率是主要结局指标。
行间隔细胞减灭术的患者手术时间、失血量和手术范围明显减少。他们的出院时间也明显更早。然而,在术后并发症或死亡率方面,他们与另一组没有差异。
新辅助化疗虽然对各种术中不良事件有积极影响,但对术后即刻的负面结局没有任何影响。