• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用基于证据的分诊算法降低高级别上皮性卵巢癌初次肿瘤细胞减灭术后 90 天死亡率。

Using an evidence-based triage algorithm to reduce 90-day mortality after primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Oct;155(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.004
PMID:31402165
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of an evidence-based triage algorithm to decide between primary debulking surgery (PDS) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT/IDS) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Surgical morbidity and mortality (M/M) after PDS for stage IIIC-IV EOC at Mayo Clinic after implementation of the triage algorithm (contemporary cohort, 2012-July 2016) were compared to that of a historic PDS cohort (2003-2011).

RESULTS

Mean age of the 232 women who met inclusion criteria in the contemporary cohort was 63.9 years. We observed a 71% decrease in 90-day mortality from 8.9% to 2.6% (P = 0.002) between the contemporary and historic cohorts. Accordion grade 3+ postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery decreased from 22.3% to 18.3% (P = 0.19). Among those with a grade 3+ complication, 90-day mortality rates decreased from 28.3% in the historic cohort to 2.4% in the contemporary cohort (P < 0.001) suggesting patients were better able to tolerate complex surgery. When compared to the historic PDS cohort, oncologic outcomes were also improved in the contemporary PDS cohort. Complete as well as optimal (residual disease ≤1 cm) cytoreduction rates increased (45.5% vs. 62.5% and 84.5% vs. 95.3%, respectively, P < 0.001), and the proportion of women starting chemotherapy within 42 days of surgery increased (57.4% vs. 69.8%, P = 0.001). Three-year overall survival was 53% in the historic cohort and 66% in the contemporary cohort (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the Mayo triage algorithm for EOC was associated with reduced 90-day mortality after PDS and improved oncologic outcomes. Surgical risk assessment is a critical aspect of treatment planning in the primary management of EOC and should be incorporated into practice.

摘要

目的

评估基于循证的分诊算法对原发性减瘤手术(PDS)和新辅助化疗后间隔减瘤手术(NACT/IDS)治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的影响。

方法

比较梅奥诊所采用分诊算法后(当代队列,2012 年 7 月至 2016 年)治疗 IIIC-IV 期 EOC 患者后 PDS 的手术发病率和死亡率(M/M)与历史 PDS 队列(2003 年至 2011 年)。

结果

当代队列中符合纳入标准的 232 名女性的平均年龄为 63.9 岁。与历史队列相比,当代队列中 90 天死亡率从 8.9%降至 2.6%(P=0.002),下降了 71%。术后 30 天内的阿科德 3+级并发症从 22.3%降至 18.3%(P=0.19)。在出现 3+级并发症的患者中,90 天死亡率从历史队列的 28.3%降至当代队列的 2.4%(P<0.001),表明患者能够更好地耐受复杂手术。与历史 PDS 队列相比,当代 PDS 队列的肿瘤学结局也得到了改善。完全减瘤术和最佳(残留病灶≤1cm)减瘤术的比例均有所提高(分别为 45.5%比 62.5%和 84.5%比 95.3%,P<0.001),且开始化疗的患者比例在 42 天内增加(分别为 57.4%比 69.8%,P=0.001)。历史队列的 3 年总生存率为 53%,当代队列为 66%(P<0.001)。

结论

梅奥分诊算法在 EOC 中的应用与 PDS 后 90 天死亡率降低和肿瘤学结局改善相关。手术风险评估是 EOC 初始治疗计划中治疗的关键方面,应纳入实践。

相似文献

1
Using an evidence-based triage algorithm to reduce 90-day mortality after primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.采用基于证据的分诊算法降低高级别上皮性卵巢癌初次肿瘤细胞减灭术后 90 天死亡率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Oct;155(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
2
Optimizing the treatment of ovarian cancer: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking versus primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancers likely to have suboptimal resection.优化卵巢癌治疗:新辅助化疗和间隔肿瘤缩小术与初始肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗可能无法实现理想切除的上皮性卵巢癌。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):266-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
Study of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer, SGOG SUNNY (SOC-2) trial concept.前瞻性手术与新辅助化疗后间隔减瘤手术治疗 IIIC 期和 IV 期卵巢癌患者的研究,SGOG SUNNY(SOC-2)试验方案。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(5):e86. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e86.
4
Minimal residual disease at primary debulking surgery versus complete tumor resection at interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A survival analysis.在晚期上皮性卵巢癌中,初次肿瘤细胞减灭术时的微小残留病灶与间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术时的完全肿瘤切除相比:一项生存分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):209-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
5
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.新辅助化疗在手术前与手术后化疗用于晚期卵巢上皮癌的初始治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 30;7(7):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub6.
6
A multimodality triage algorithm to improve cytoreductive outcomes in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center team ovary initiative.一种多模态分诊算法,旨在提高接受原发性减瘤手术治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的细胞减灭术效果:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心卵巢倡议团队。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;158(3):608-613. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.041. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
7
Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.高级别晚期卵巢癌的初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与初次新辅助化疗:生存比较。
Radiol Oncol. 2018 Sep 11;52(3):307-319. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0030.
8
Evaluating the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study.评价新辅助化疗在晚期上皮性卵巢癌中的获益:一项回顾性研究。
J Ovarian Res. 2019 Sep 13;12(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0562-9.
9
[Analysis of factors related to the prognostic benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer].[晚期卵巢癌患者新辅助化疗后行间隔减瘤手术的预后获益相关因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 25;56(6):385-392. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20201207-00871.
10
Similar Overall Survival Using Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Debulking Surgery in Patients Aged Over 75 Years with High-Grade Ovarian Cancer.对于 75 岁以上高级别卵巢癌患者,新辅助化疗与初次肿瘤细胞减灭术的总生存情况相似。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Nov;42(11):1339-1345. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.04.014. Epub 2020 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Surgical Outcomes and Overall Survival Among Women Undergoing Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in the U.S: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.美国晚期卵巢癌减瘤手术女性患者的手术结局及总生存率趋势:国家癌症数据库分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Sep 2;17(17):2884. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172884.
2
Effect of different treatment modalities on the prognosis of stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of the SEER database.不同治疗方式对 IV 期上皮性卵巢癌预后的影响:SEER 数据库分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jun 15;24(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03199-5.
3
Mortality impact, risks, and benefits of general population screening for ovarian cancer: the UKCTOCS randomised controlled trial.
普通人群卵巢癌筛查的死亡率影响、风险及益处:英国卵巢癌筛查协作试验(UKCTOCS)随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(10):1-93. doi: 10.3310/BHBR5832.
4
Development of a Novel Intra-Operative Score to Record Diseases' Anatomic Fingerprints (ANAFI Score) for the Prediction of Complete Cytoreduction in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer by Using Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.开发一种新型术中评分系统以记录疾病的解剖特征(ANAFI评分),用于通过机器学习和可解释人工智能预测晚期卵巢癌的完全肿瘤细胞减灭术。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;15(3):966. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030966.
5
Validation of a risk-based algorithm to reduce poor operative outcomes after complex surgery for ovarian cancer.验证一种基于风险的算法,以降低卵巢癌复杂手术后不良手术结局的风险。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Jan 3;33(1):83-88. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003799.
6
Primary or Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: a Personalized Decision-a Literature Review.原发性或间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗晚期卵巢癌:个体化决策——文献综述。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Dec;24(12):1661-1668. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01318-9. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
7
Differences in Treatment Modalities and Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Two-Center Propensity Score-Matched Study.老年卵巢癌患者治疗方式与预后的差异:一项两中心倾向评分匹配研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 27;14(15):3655. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153655.
8
When we open and close: Postoperative outcomes after aborted primary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer.当我们进行开腹与关腹操作时:卵巢癌初次减瘤手术失败后的术后结局。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Apr 14;41:100981. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100981. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Individualization in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer based on the mechanism of action of molecularly targeted drugs.基于作用机制的分子靶向药物对晚期卵巢癌一线治疗的个体化。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun;27(6):1001-1012. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02163-3. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
10
Incidence of venous thromboembolism after standard treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in Korea.韩国上皮性卵巢癌患者接受标准治疗后的静脉血栓栓塞发生率。
Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(6):2045-2053. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3797. Epub 2021 Feb 26.