Combes Adrien, Dekerle Jeanne, Bougault Valérie, Daussin Frédéric N
a University of Lille, EA 7369 - URePSSS - Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport Santé Société , F-59000 Lille , France.
b Centre for Sport Exercise Science and Medicine (SESAME) , University of Brighton , Eastbourne , UK.
J Sports Sci. 2017 Jan;35(1):7-13. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1154591. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
The succession of on-transient phases that induce a repetition of metabolic changes is a possible mechanism responsible for the greater response to intermittent training (IT). The objective of this study was to quantify [Formula: see text] fluctuations during intermittent exercise characterised by the same work:rest ratio, but different durations and identify which duration leads to the greatest fluctuations. Ten participants (24 ± 5 years; [Formula: see text]: 42 ± 7 mL·min·kg) performed (1) an incremental test to exhaustion to determine peak work rate (WR) and oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), (2), and three 1 h intermittent exercises alternating work period at 70% WR with passive recovery period of different 1:1 work:recovery duty cycles (30 s:30 s, 60 s:60 s, 120 s:120 s). [Formula: see text] response analysis revealed differences in the fluctuations across the intermittent conditions despite an identical total energy expenditure. The sum of the cycle's nadir-to-peak [Formula: see text] differences (ΣΔ[Formula: see text]) and the oxygen fluctuation index (OFI) were both greater in the 60 s:60 s condition (ΣΔ[Formula: see text]: +38% ± 13% and +19% ± 18% vs. 120 s:120 s and 30 s:30 s, P < 0.05; OFI: +41% ± 29% and +67% ± 62% vs. 120 s:120 s and 30:30 s, P < 0.05). [Formula: see text] fluctuation analysis was successful in identifying the intermittent condition associated with the greatest disturbances: the 60 s:60 s duty cycle induces more [Formula: see text] fluctuations. The present findings also demonstrate that the selection of the duty cycle duration for submaximal intermittent exercise (70% of WR) prescription is of interest to produce high [Formula: see text] fluctuations.
引发代谢变化重复出现的非瞬态阶段的连续发生,是对间歇训练(IT)产生更大反应的一种可能机制。本研究的目的是量化在以相同工作与休息比但不同持续时间为特征的间歇运动期间的[公式:见正文]波动,并确定哪种持续时间会导致最大的波动。十名参与者(24±5岁;[公式:见正文]:42±7 mL·min·kg)进行了(1)一次递增力竭测试以确定峰值工作率(WR)和摄氧量([公式:见正文]),(2)以及三次1小时的间歇运动,在70% WR的工作期与不同1:1工作与恢复占空比(30秒:30秒、60秒:60秒、120秒:120秒)的被动恢复期之间交替。[公式:见正文]反应分析显示,尽管总能量消耗相同,但各间歇条件下的波动存在差异。在60秒:60秒条件下,周期的最低点到峰值的[公式:见正文]差异总和(ΣΔ[公式:见正文])和氧波动指数(OFI)均更大(ΣΔ[公式:见正文]:与120秒:120秒和30秒:30秒相比分别为+38%±13%和+19%±18%,P<0.05;OFI:与120秒:120秒和30:30秒相比分别为+41%±29%和+67%±62%,P<0.05)。[公式:见正文]波动分析成功地识别出了与最大干扰相关的间歇条件:60秒:60秒的占空比会引发更多的[公式:见正文]波动。本研究结果还表明,对于次最大强度间歇运动(WR的70%)处方中占空比持续时间的选择,对于产生较大的[公式:见正文]波动具有重要意义。