• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年运动员创伤性前肩不稳的开放性Bankart修复术

The Open Bankart Repair for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability in Teenage Athletes.

作者信息

Hatch Mark D, Hennrikus William L

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Jan;38(1):27-31. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000744.

DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000744
PMID:26945245
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic anterior shoulder instability from recurrent dislocations or subluxations is a debilitating problem for the teenage athlete. The risk of recurrent instability is high in this adolescent population. We performed a retrospective case series analysis of adolescent athletes with recurrent instability treated with open Bankart repair and evaluated functional outcomes as well as redislocation rates.

METHODS

The retrospective study included 21 teenage patients with Bankart lesions and recurrent anterior shoulder instability. There were 19 males (90%) and 2 females (10%) with an average age of 16 years (range, 14 to 18 y). Patients were evaluated based on Rowe and UCLA shoulder scores, return to previous level of sport, external rotation, and recurrence.

RESULTS

The average number of anchors used to repair the Bankart lesion was 3 (range, 2 to 5). One patient was lost to follow-up at 6 months after surgery. The remaining 20 patients all had at least 2-year follow-up. The recurrent instability rate was zero. In total, 100% of patients had an excellent result based on an average Rowe score of 96.5 points of 100 points (a score of 90 to 100 is an excellent result). In total, 100% of patients had good/excellent result based on an average UCLA shoulder score of 34 of 35 (a score >27 is a good/excellent result). At final follow-up, 7 patients (34%) had lost an average of 11 degrees of external rotation (range, 5 to 20 degrees) on the injured shoulder with the arm at the side compared with the noninjured shoulder.

CONCLUSIONS

Contact teenage athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability can be treated with open Bankart repair with a low recurrence, excellent functional shoulder outcomes, and return to sport. A small amount of external rotation may be lost with this technique. Care must be taken when considering this method with throwing athletes (ie, quarterback or pitcher). The open Bankart should remain a viable alternative for the adolescent population with recurrent anterior instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

摘要

背景

复发性脱位或半脱位导致的创伤性前肩不稳是青少年运动员面临的一个使人衰弱的问题。在这个青少年群体中,复发性不稳的风险很高。我们对接受开放性Bankart修复术治疗的复发性不稳的青少年运动员进行了一项回顾性病例系列分析,并评估了功能结果以及再脱位率。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了21例患有Bankart损伤和复发性前肩不稳的青少年患者。其中男性19例(90%),女性2例(10%),平均年龄16岁(范围14至18岁)。根据Rowe和UCLA肩部评分、恢复到先前运动水平的情况、外旋以及复发情况对患者进行评估。

结果

修复Bankart损伤所用锚钉的平均数量为3个(范围2至5个)。1例患者在术后6个月失访。其余20例患者均有至少2年的随访。再脱位率为零。总体而言,基于平均Rowe评分为100分中的96.5分(评分90至100分为优秀结果),100%的患者结果为优秀。基于平均UCLA肩部评分为35分中的34分(评分>27分为良好/优秀结果),100%的患者结果为良好/优秀。在末次随访时,与未受伤侧肩部相比,7例患者(34%)受伤侧肩部手臂处于体侧时平均外旋丧失了 11度(范围5至20度)。

结论

患有复发性前肩不稳的青少年运动员可以通过开放性Bankart修复术进行治疗,复发率低,肩部功能结果优异,且能恢复运动。采用这种技术可能会有少量外旋丧失。对于投掷运动员(如四分卫或投手)考虑采用这种方法时必须谨慎。开放性Bankart修复术对于患有复发性前不稳的青少年人群应仍然是一种可行的选择。

证据级别

四级。

相似文献

1
The Open Bankart Repair for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability in Teenage Athletes.青少年运动员创伤性前肩不稳的开放性Bankart修复术
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Jan;38(1):27-31. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000744.
2
[Arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors: results and risk factors of recurrence of instability].[关节镜下使用缝线锚钉修复Bankart损伤:不稳定复发的结果及危险因素]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jul 1;49(7):597-602. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2011.07.006.
3
Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure Compared With Bankart Repair for Recurrent Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability.Latarjet 手术与 Bankart 修复治疗复发性创伤性肩关节前不稳定的疗效比较。
J Athl Train. 2018 Feb;53(2):181-183. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-232-16. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
4
The open latarjet procedure is more reliable in terms of shoulder stability than arthroscopic bankart repair.就肩部稳定性而言,开放Latarjet手术比关节镜下Bankart修复术更可靠。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2345-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3550-9.
5
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport.关节镜下Bankart修复术与开放Bristow-Latarjet手术治疗肩关节不稳的比较:一项聚焦于恢复运动的配对多中心研究
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3198-3205. doi: 10.1177/0363546516658037. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Arthroscopic revision Bankart repair: a prospective outcome study.关节镜下翻修Bankart修复术:一项前瞻性结果研究。
Arthroscopy. 2002 May-Jun;18(5):469-82. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.32230.
7
Arthroscopic Bankart repair using Knotless or BioKnotless suture anchors: 2- to 7-year results.使用无结或生物无结缝线锚钉进行关节镜下Bankart修复术:2至7年的结果
Arthroscopy. 2007 Apr;23(4):367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.024.
8
Open Bankart repair with suture anchors for traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability: comparison of results between small and large Bankart lesions.使用缝合锚钉进行开放性Bankart修复治疗创伤性复发性前肩关节不稳:小Bankart损伤与大Bankart损伤的结果比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Jan;14(1):82-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0615-4. Epub 2005 Apr 27.
9
Arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability with the use of suture anchors.使用缝线锚钉进行关节镜下Bankart修复术治疗创伤性前肩关节不稳
Singapore Med J. 2008 Sep;49(9):676-81.
10
Results of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior-Inferior Shoulder Instability at 13-Year Follow-up.肩关节镜下Bankart修复术治疗前下肩不稳13年随访结果
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(4):782-787. doi: 10.1177/0363546516675145. Epub 2016 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Return to Competitive Sport After Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Scoping Review of Current Outcomes and Clearance Decision-Making Criteria.肩关节前路稳定术后重返竞技运动:当前结果及恢复参赛决策标准的范围综述
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025 Sep 1;20(9):1292-1310. doi: 10.26603/001c.143184. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation and Management of Glenohumeral Instability in Adolescent Patients: An Expert Consensus Statement.青少年患者肩肱关节不稳的评估与管理:专家共识声明
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 30;12(9):23259671241271735. doi: 10.1177/23259671241271735. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Anterior Shoulder Instability and Open Procedures: History, Indications, and Clinical Outcomes.
前肩不稳和开放性手术:历史、适应证和临床结果。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Aug;15(4):521-533. doi: 10.4055/cios23018. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Pediatric and Adolescent Shoulder Instability.小儿及青少年肩部不稳
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023 Jul;16(7):263-273. doi: 10.1007/s12178-023-09837-z. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
Open Stabilization Procedures of the Shoulder in the Athlete: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.运动员肩部开放稳定手术:适应症、技术及结果
Open Access J Sports Med. 2021 Nov 2;12:159-169. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S321883. eCollection 2021.
6
Outcomes and Return to Sport and Work After Open Bankart Repair for Recurrent Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.复发性肩关节不稳切开Bankart修复术后的结果及恢复运动和工作情况:一项系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Oct 7;9(10):23259671211026907. doi: 10.1177/23259671211026907. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Evolving Concepts in the Management of Shoulder Instability.肩关节不稳定管理的演变概念
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Mar 4;55(2):285-298. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00348-4. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Outcome Measures After Shoulder Stabilization in the Athletic Population: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Patient-Reported Metrics.运动员人群肩部稳定手术后的结局指标:临床和患者报告指标的系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):2325967120950040. doi: 10.1177/2325967120950040. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Surgical stabilization of pediatric anterior shoulder instability yields high recurrence rates: a systematic review.手术治疗儿童前肩不稳定的复发率较高:系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jan;29(1):192-201. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05913-w. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
10
Management of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability After Surgical Stabilization in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年手术稳定治疗后复发性前肩不稳的管理
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Apr;13(2):164-172. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09612-4.