• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的麻醉方法比较

Comparison of Anesthesia Methods in Treatment of Staghorn Kidney Stones with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

作者信息

Buldu Ibrahim, Tepeler Abdulkadir, Kaynar Mehmet, Karatag Tuna, Tosun Muhammed, Umutogluv Tarik, Tanriover Hakan, Istanbulluoglu Okan

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mevlana, Konya 42000, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey.

出版信息

Urol J. 2016 Mar 5;13(1):2479-83.

PMID:26945650
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in the treatment of staghorn calculi (SC) under spinal anesthesia (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with SC who treated with PNL from 2011 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 100 patients were divided into 2 groups according to anesthesia type: SA (group 1, n = 47) and GA (group 2, n = 53). Demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative analgesic requirements were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, or stone size between the two groups (P = .40, .30, .18, .20, and .50, respectively). The mean procedure times were 84.7 and 87.5 min in the SA and GA groups, respectively (P = .68). The complication rates were similar in the SA and GA groups (19.1% vs. 13.2%, respectively; P = .421). The stone-free rates were also similar in the SA and GA groups (61.7% vs. 52.8%, respectively; P = .374). No statistically significant difference was found in analgesic requirements.

CONCLUSION

SA is a safe method without the risks of GA and may be used for conditions in which GA is contraindicated or in patients with concerns about GA. Our outcomes indicated that SC can be treated safely and effectively under SA.

摘要

目的

比较脊髓麻醉(SA)与全身麻醉(GA)下经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)治疗鹿角形结石(SC)的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2011年至2014年接受PNL治疗的SC患者。根据麻醉类型将100例患者分为两组:SA组(第1组,n = 47)和GA组(第2组,n = 53)。比较两组患者的人口统计学、围手术期参数和术后镇痛需求。

结果

两组患者在年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会评分、体重指数或结石大小方面无显著差异(P值分别为0.40、0.30、0.18、0.20和0.50)。SA组和GA组的平均手术时间分别为84.7分钟和87.5分钟(P = 0.68)。SA组和GA组的并发症发生率相似(分别为19.1%和13.2%;P = 0.421)。SA组和GA组的结石清除率也相似(分别为61.7%和52.8%;P = 0.374)。在镇痛需求方面未发现统计学显著差异。

结论

SA是一种无GA风险的安全方法,可用于GA禁忌或对GA有顾虑的患者。我们的结果表明,在SA下可以安全有效地治疗SC。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Anesthesia Methods in Treatment of Staghorn Kidney Stones with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的麻醉方法比较
Urol J. 2016 Mar 5;13(1):2479-83.
2
A prospective randomized study comparing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia.一项前瞻性随机研究,比较腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉下经皮肾镜取石术与全身麻醉下经皮肾镜取石术。
Urol Int. 2011;87(3):293-8. doi: 10.1159/000329796. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
3
Ureteral Catheter Versus Nephrostomy Tube for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospectively Randomized Trial.经皮肾镜取石术患者行椎管内麻醉时使用输尿管导管与肾造瘘管的前瞻性随机试验。
J Endourol. 2019 Apr;33(4):291-294. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0875.
4
Comparison of Two Different Anesthesia Methods in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术患者两种不同麻醉方法的比较
Urol J. 2019 Jun 17;16(3):246-250. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4291.
5
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal versus general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.经皮肾镜取石术在脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉下的比较:一项随机临床试验。
J Endourol. 2013 Aug;27(8):974-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0145. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
6
Is micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery technically feasible and efficient under spinal anesthesia?在脊髓麻醉下,微通道经皮肾镜取石术在技术上是否可行且高效?
Urolithiasis. 2015 Jun;43(3):249-54. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0752-x. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
7
The optimal minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy strategy for the treatment of staghorn stones in a solitary kidney.治疗孤立肾鹿角形结石的最佳微创经皮肾镜取石术策略
Urolithiasis. 2016 Apr;44(2):149-54. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0803-3. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
8
[Multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of staghorn stones].[多通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形结石]
Urologiia. 2018 Oct(4):96-101.
9
Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial.后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形结石的围手术期和长期结果:一项单中心随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1441-1447. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
The effect of anesthesia type on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly males.麻醉类型对老年男性经皮肾镜取石术结局的影响。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2238185. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2238185.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional versus general anaesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术中区域麻醉与全身麻醉的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(1):140-151. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.233. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
2
General spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术中全身麻醉的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 1;12:281. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.124704.2. eCollection 2023.
3
Influence of anesthesia methods on surgical outcomes and renal function in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled study.
麻醉方式对逆行肾内取石术手术效果及肾功能的影响:一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0901-9.