• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形结石的围手术期和长期结果:一项单中心随机对照试验。

Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, XinQiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, 37 XinQiao Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400037, China.

Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1441-1447. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x
PMID:30361956
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (RLP) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of staghorn calculi.

METHODS

From May 2011 to March 2017, eligible patients with staghorn calculi were randomly assigned to two groups: RLP and PCNL. Patients underwent the operations prospectively. Subsequently, a follow-up protocol was performed. Perioperative data related to the efficacy, safety and long-term outcomes (stone recurrence and functional changes in the affected kidney) were comparatively analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 105 patients underwent surgical treatment, including 51 in the RLP group and 54 in the PCNL group. There was no difference in demographics or stone characteristics between the two groups. The single-session stone-free rate (SFR) was higher (88.2% vs. 64.8%), the mean hemoglobin drop was lower (0.4 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.9 g/dL), the rate of postoperative fever was lower (5.9% vs. 20.4%), but operative time was longer (135.7 ± 35.5 vs. 101.9 ± 41.2 min) and the total cost was more expensive (5546 ± 772 vs. 3861 ± 402 USD)in the RLP group than in the PCNL group (all p < 0.05). The mean increase in the split function (8.3 ± 3.1 vs. 4.2 ± 2.4 mL/min) and the rate of improvement of the affected kidney (56.3% vs. 35.3%) were significantly higher in the RLP group than in the PCNL group at 1 year after surgery (both p < 0.05). However, the rate of stone recurrence was similar between the groups at a mean follow-up of 47.3 ± 18.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PCNL remains the first-line treatment for most cases of staghorn calculi. Nevertheless, in some selected cases with the extrarenal and dilated pelvis, RLP can be considered as an alternative management of staghorn calculi, which was associated with a high single-session SFR, low rates of complications, and better functional preservation of the affected kidney.

摘要

目的

比较后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术(RLP)与经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)治疗鹿角形结石的围手术期和长期疗效。

方法

2011 年 5 月至 2017 年 3 月,符合条件的鹿角形结石患者被随机分为两组:RLP 组和 PCNL 组。患者前瞻性接受手术治疗。随后,进行了随访方案。比较两组患者的疗效、安全性和长期结果(结石复发和受影响肾脏功能变化)的围手术期数据。

结果

共有 105 例患者接受了手术治疗,其中 RLP 组 51 例,PCNL 组 54 例。两组患者的人口统计学和结石特征无差异。单次结石清除率(SFR)更高(88.2% vs. 64.8%),平均血红蛋白下降幅度更低(0.4 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.9 g/dL),术后发热率更低(5.9% vs. 20.4%),但手术时间更长(135.7 ± 35.5 比 101.9 ± 41.2 min),总费用更高(5546 ± 772 比 3861 ± 402 美元)(均 P < 0.05)。RLP 组术后 1 年时,分肾功能的平均改善(8.3 ± 3.1 比 4.2 ± 2.4 mL/min)和受影响肾脏的改善率(56.3% vs. 35.3%)明显高于 PCNL 组(均 P < 0.05)。然而,在平均随访 47.3 ± 18.6 个月后,两组结石复发率相似。

结论

PCNL 仍然是大多数鹿角形结石的一线治疗方法。然而,在某些具有肾外和肾盂扩张的选定病例中,RLP 可作为鹿角形结石的替代治疗方法,其单次结石清除率高、并发症发生率低,受影响肾脏的功能保存更好。

相似文献

1
Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial.后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形结石的围手术期和长期结果:一项单中心随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1441-1447. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
2
Randomized controlled trial comparing retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study.随机对照试验比较后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型肾盂结石:一项初步研究。
J Endourol. 2014 Aug;28(8):946-50. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0064. Epub 2014 May 28.
3
Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treating the Patients with Staghorn Kidney Stones: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石:一项随机临床试验。
Urol J. 2021 Dec 20;19(1):28-33. doi: 10.22037/uj.v18i.6831.
4
Medium-Term Stone Recurrence after zero-fragment transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Compared with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large Single Renal Pelvis Stones.零碎片经腹腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型单发性肾盂结石后的中期结石复发情况比较
Urol J. 2024 Feb 28;21(1):35-39. doi: 10.22037/uj.v20i.7676.
5
Comparison of RLP and PCNL for large pelvis calculi with CKD.RLP 与 PCNL 治疗伴有 CKD 的大骨盆结石的比较。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2024 Feb;33(1):51-57. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2023.2286241. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
6
[A comparative analysis of the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy].经皮肾镜取石术与腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术结果的比较分析
Urologiia. 2019 Jun(2):26-30.
7
Comparative analysis of retro vs. transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones.后腹腔镜与经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术治疗大肾结石的对比分析。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Oct 9;52(1):137. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01640-w.
8
A Comparative Study of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Staghorn Renal Calculi.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角状肾结石的对比研究。
Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(4):568-574. doi: 10.62713/aic.3474.
9
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of bilateral staghorn renal calculi in pediatric patients: 12 years experience in a tertiary care centre.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗小儿双侧鹿角状肾结石:三级医疗中心 12 年经验。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):393-399. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0920-7. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盂结石患者的安全性和有效性比较:一项随机临床试验
Urol J. 2014 Nov 30;11(6):1932-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter to the editor for the article "a comparison on safety and efficacy between 24 fr versus 18 fr pneumatic balloon dilators for percutaneous treatment of renal stones between 10 and 20 mm: results from a contemporary cohort".致编辑的信:关于文章《24F与18F气囊扩张器经皮治疗10至20毫米肾结石的安全性和疗效比较:当代队列研究结果》
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 14;43(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05527-2.
2
Comparative analysis of retro vs. transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones.后腹腔镜与经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术治疗大肾结石的对比分析。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Oct 9;52(1):137. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01640-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Guidelines for Surgical Management of Urolithiasis.尿石症外科治疗指南评估。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1267-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.111. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
2
[Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for staghorn kidney stones. multi-center study].[腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石。多中心研究]
Urologiia. 2017 Jul(3):40-45. doi: 10.18565/urol.2017.3.40-45.
3
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal pelvic calculi (diameter >2 cm): a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型肾盂结石(直径>2厘米)的Meta分析
The experience of a tertiary referral center with laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones during 18 years.
18 年来三级转诊中心腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术治疗大肾结石的经验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):23102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50331-w.
4
Open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of staghorn calculi.开放手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形结石的比较
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2022 Aug 15;10(4):271-276. eCollection 2022.
5
Renal function markers in single-kidney patients after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A pilot study.经皮肾镜取石术后单肾患者的肾功能标志物:一项初步研究。
J Res Med Sci. 2022 Feb 18;27:17. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_880_21. eCollection 2022.
6
Efficacy and safety of 3D printing-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complex renal calculi.3D 打印辅助经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性肾结石的疗效及安全性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03851-2.
7
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型肾结石的疗效及安全性:一项荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2021 Jan;49(1):300060520983136. doi: 10.1177/0300060520983136.
8
Management of staghorn stones in special situations.特殊情况下鹿角形结石的处理
Asian J Urol. 2020 Apr;7(2):130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.014. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
9
Analysis of the clinical effect and long-term follow-up results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi (report of 206 cases followed for 10 years).分析后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗复杂性上段输尿管结石的临床效果及 10 年随访结果(附 206 例报告)。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Nov;51(11):1955-1960. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02252-9. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
10
Pyelolithotomy in a Patient with Complete Coraliform Calcification Induced by a Double-J Ureteral Stent.双J输尿管支架致完全珊瑚状钙化患者的肾盂切开取石术
Case Rep Urol. 2019 May 28;2019:6957141. doi: 10.1155/2019/6957141. eCollection 2019.
Acta Chir Belg. 2016 Dec;116(6):346-356. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1181312. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
4
Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盂结石患者的安全性和有效性比较:一项随机临床试验
Urol J. 2014 Nov 30;11(6):1932-7.
5
Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术的并发症
World J Urol. 2015 Aug;33(8):1069-77. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1400-8. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
6
The outcome of urine culture positive and culture negative staghorn calculi after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy.微创经皮肾镜取石术后尿培养阳性和培养阴性鹿角形结石的治疗结果
Urolithiasis. 2014 Jun;42(3):235-40. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0645-4. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
7
Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery.经皮肾镜碎石术后发生脓毒症的危险因素。
Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Oct;10(10):598-605. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.183. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
8
Predictive factors for bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术期间出血的预测因素。
Korean J Urol. 2013 Jul;54(7):448-53. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.7.448. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
9
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盂大结石的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
10
Laparoscopic management in stone disease.腹腔镜治疗结石病。
Curr Opin Urol. 2013 Mar;23(2):169-74. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835d307f.