• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特邀评论：政策评估的跨学科方法

Invited Commentary: An Interdisciplinary Approach for Policy Evaluation.

作者信息

Hawkins Summer Sherburne, Baum Christopher F

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Mar 15;183(6):539-41. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv237. Epub 2016 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwv237
PMID:26946396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5013927/
Abstract

Evidence-based policymaking is becoming the norm, but how do we acquire the evidence to inform policies? In their article in the present issue of the Journal, Basu et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(6):531-538) used difference-in-difference-in-differences models and a synthetic control approach to examine the effects of the 1996 welfare reforms on health outcomes among single mothers. In the present commentary, we discuss the limitations of observational studies for policy evaluation. Difference-in-differences models, from the field of economics, offer a rigorous approach to cope with those limitations.

摘要

基于证据的政策制定正成为常态，但我们如何获取为政策提供依据的证据呢？在本期《期刊》上发表的文章中，巴苏等人（《美国流行病学杂志》。2016年；183(6):531 - 538）使用了三重差分模型和合成控制法来研究1996年福利改革对单身母亲健康结果的影响。在本评论中，我们讨论了观察性研究用于政策评估的局限性。来自经济学领域的差分模型提供了一种严谨的方法来应对这些局限性。

相似文献

1
Invited Commentary: An Interdisciplinary Approach for Policy Evaluation.特邀评论：政策评估的跨学科方法
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Mar 15;183(6):539-41. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv237. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
2
Basu et al. Respond to "Interdisciplinary Approach for Policy Evaluation".巴苏等人回应《政策评估的跨学科方法》。
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Mar 15;183(6):542-3. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv239. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
3
Health Behaviors, Mental Health, and Health Care Utilization Among Single Mothers After Welfare Reforms in the 1990s.20世纪90年代福利改革后单身母亲的健康行为、心理健康与医疗保健利用情况
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Mar 15;183(6):531-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv249. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
4
Single mothers and the use of professionals for mental health care reasons.单身母亲与因心理健康护理需求而使用专业服务的情况。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Dec;59(12):2535-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.035.
5
How has Welfare to Work reform affected the mental health of single parents in Australia?
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014 Dec;38(6):594-5. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12304.
6
Neoliberalism, welfare policy and health: a qualitative meta-synthesis of single parents' experience of the transition from welfare to work.新自由主义、福利政策与健康：对单亲父母从福利到工作过渡经历的定性元分析
Health (London). 2012 Sep;16(5):507-30. doi: 10.1177/1363459311434650. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
7
[Single-parent mothers, poverty and mental health: review of the literature].
Sante Ment Que. 1994 Spring;19(1):157-73.
8
Keeping it in the family: the self-rated health of lone mothers in different European welfare regimes.家族内部因素：不同欧洲福利制度下单身母亲的自评健康状况
Sociol Health Illn. 2014 Nov;36(8):1220-42. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12162.
9
An econometric analysis of smoking prevalence among lone mothers.单亲母亲吸烟率的计量经济学分析。
J Health Econ. 1999 Aug;18(4):429-41. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(98)00045-9.
10
Single mothers in Ontario: sociodemographic, physical and mental health characteristics.安大略省的单身母亲：社会人口学、身心健康特征
CMAJ. 1997 Mar 1;156(5):639-45.

引用本文的文献

1
Basu et al. Respond to "Interdisciplinary Approach for Policy Evaluation".巴苏等人回应《政策评估的跨学科方法》。
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Mar 15;183(6):542-3. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv239. Epub 2016 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Behaviors, Mental Health, and Health Care Utilization Among Single Mothers After Welfare Reforms in the 1990s.20世纪90年代福利改革后单身母亲的健康行为、心理健康与医疗保健利用情况
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Mar 15;183(6):531-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv249. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
2
Tobacco-control policies in tobacco-growing states: where tobacco was king.烟草种植州的烟草控制政策：在烟草称王之地。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):319-58. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12124.
3
Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach.评估医疗保健政策变化的方法：双重差分法
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2401-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16153.
4
Current cigarette smoking among adults--United States, 2005-2013.2005 - 2013年美国成年人当前吸烟情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Nov 28;63(47):1108-12.
5
Associations of tobacco control policies with birth outcomes.烟草控制政策与出生结局的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Nov;168(11):e142365. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2365. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
6
Impact of state cigarette taxes on disparities in maternal smoking during pregnancy.州香烟税对孕妇吸烟差异的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1464-70. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301955. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
7
What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies.关于烟草业影响烟草税的努力，我们了解多少？对实证研究的系统评价。
Tob Control. 2013 Mar;22(2):144-53. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050098. Epub 2012 Aug 12.
8
Increased tobacco exposure in older children and its effect on asthma and ear infections.儿童接触烟草增加及其对哮喘和耳部感染的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2011 Jun;48(6):647-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.017. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
9
Cigarette taxes and youth smoking: new evidence from national, state, and local Youth Risk Behavior Surveys.香烟税与青少年吸烟：来自全国、州和地方青少年风险行为调查的新证据。
J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):287-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.05.008. Epub 2007 Dec 5.