Cillino Salvatore, Casuccio Alessandra, Di Pace Francesco, Cagini Carlo, Ferraro Lucia Lee, Cillino Giovanni
Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Ophthalmology Section, University of Palermo (Italy), via Liborio Giuffrè, 13, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Department of Sciences for Health Promotion and Mother-Child Care "G. D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, I, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar 5;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0198-0.
Clinical studies comparing trabeculectomy augmented with Ologen implant (OLO) versus trabeculectomy plus mitomycin-C (MMC) show contradictory results. To obtain long-term data, we report an extended 5-year follow-up trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of OLO as adjuvant compared to low-dosage MMC in trabeculectomy.
Forty glaucoma patients (40 eyes) assigned to trabeculectomy with MMC or Ologen.
target IOP at ≤21, ≤17 and ≤15 mmHg; complete and qualified success endpoint rates.
visual acuity (VA), mean deviation (MD), bleb evaluation, according to Moorfields Bleb Grading System (MBGS); spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) bleb examination; number of glaucoma medications; frequency of postoperative complications.
The mean preoperative IOP was 26.7(±5.2) in MMC and 27.3(±6.0) in OLO eyes. Mean 60-month percentage reduction in IOP was significant in both groups [40.9 (±14.2) and 42.1(±13.3) P = 0.01], with an endpoint value of 15.2 (±3.2) and 15.8 (±2.3) mmHg in MMC and OLO, respectively. Complete success rates at ≤ 21 mmHg target IOP were 65% and 70%, at ≤17 mm Hg 60% and 55%, and at the ≤15 mm Hg target IOP 35% and 45% in MMC and OLO, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curves did not differ both for complete and qualified success at any target IOP, with no significant endpoint intergroup difference at ≤ 15 mm Hg (log-rank P = 0.595).The intergroup MBGS scores differed due to reduced central and peripheral vascularity in MMC group (P = 0.027; P = 0.041). SD-OCT analysis denied differences in bleb height between MMC vs OLO (140.5 ± 20.3 μ vs 129.2 ± 19.3 μ respectively; P =0.079). Mean antiglaucoma medications were significantly reduced (P < 0.0005) from 2.5 (±0.3) to 1.2 (±0.4) in MMC and from 2.6 (±0.2) to 1.4 (±0.3) in OLO group, with no intergroup differences (P = 0.08). Six (30%) cystic thin avascular blebs without oozing were recorded in the MMC group and 2 (10%) in the OLO group, without intergroup difference (P = 0.235).
Our extended follow-up results confirm that Ologen implant yields efficacy and long-term success rates quite similar to MMC, with at least equivalent safety.
比较使用奥洛根植入物(OLO)增强小梁切除术与小梁切除术加丝裂霉素-C(MMC)的临床研究结果相互矛盾。为了获得长期数据,我们报告了一项为期5年的延长随访试验,评估OLO作为小梁切除术中辅助剂与低剂量MMC相比的安全性和有效性。
40例青光眼患者(40只眼)被分配接受MMC小梁切除术或奥洛根小梁切除术。
目标眼压≤21mmHg、≤17mmHg和≤15mmHg;完全成功和合格成功终点率。
视力(VA)、平均偏差(MD)、根据穆尔菲尔德滤过泡分级系统(MBGS)进行的滤过泡评估;频域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)滤过泡检查;青光眼药物数量;术后并发症发生率。
MMC组术前平均眼压为26.7(±5.2),OLO组为27.3(±6.0)。两组眼压平均60个月降低百分比均显著[40.9(±14.2)和42.1(±13.3),P = 0.01],MMC组和OLO组的终点值分别为15.2(±3.2)和15.8(±2.3)mmHg。在目标眼压≤21mmHg时,MMC组和OLO组的完全成功率分别为65%和70%;在≤17mmHg时分别为60%和55%;在≤15mmHg目标眼压时分别为35%和45%。在任何目标眼压下,Kaplan-Meier曲线在完全成功和合格成功方面均无差异,在≤15mmHg时组间终点无显著差异(对数秩检验P = 0.595)。MMC组的中央和周边血管减少导致组间MBGS评分存在差异(P = 0.027;P = 0.041)。SD-OCT分析显示MMC组与OLO组的滤过泡高度无差异(分别为140.5±20.3μm和129.2±19.3μm;P = 0.079)。MMC组平均抗青光眼药物从2.5(±0.3)显著减少(P < 0.0005)至1.2(±0.4),OLO组从2.6(±0.2)减少至1.4(±0.3),组间无差异(P = 0.08)。MMC组记录到6个(30%)无渗液的囊性薄壁无血管滤过泡,OLO组有2个(10%),组间无差异(P = 0.235)。
我们的延长随访结果证实,奥洛根植入物产生的疗效和长期成功率与MMC相当,且安全性至少相当。