Suppr超能文献

器械改良小梁切除术治疗青光眼。

Device-modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea, South.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 13;3(3):CD010472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010472.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy that leads to visual field defects and vision loss. It is the second leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world. Treatment for glaucoma aims to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to slow or prevent further vision loss. IOP can be lowered with medications, laser, or incisional surgery. Trabeculectomy is a surgical approach which lowers IOP by shunting aqueous humor to a subconjunctival bleb. Device-modified trabeculectomy techniques are intended to improve the durability and safety of this bleb-forming surgery. Trabeculectomy-modifying devices include the Ex-PRESS, the XEN Gel Stent, the PreserFlo MicroShunt, as well as antifibrotic materials such as Ologen, amniotic membrane, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane, Gelfilm and others. However, the comparative effectiveness and safety of these devices are uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of different devices as adjuncts to trabeculectomy on IOP control in eyes with glaucoma compared to standard trabeculectomy.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search was August 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials in participants with glaucoma comparing device-modified trabeculectomy techniques with standard trabeculectomy. We included studies that used antimetabolites in either or both treatment groups.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. change in IOP and 2. mean postoperative IOP at one year. Our secondary outcomes were 3. mean change in IOP from baseline, 4. mean postoperative IOP at any time point, 5. mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), 6. visual field change, 7. quality of life, 8. proportion of participants who are drop-free at one year, 9. mean number of IOP lowering medications at one year, and 10. proportion of participants with complications.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight studies met our inclusion criteria, of which seven were full-length journal articles and one was a conference abstract. The eight studies included 961 participants with glaucoma, and compared two types of devices implanted during trabeculectomy versus standard trabeculectomy. Seven studies (462 eyes, 434 participants) used the Ex-PRESS, and one study (527 eyes, 527 participants) used the PreserFlo MicroShunt. No studies using the XEN Gel Stent implantation met our criteria. The studies were conducted in North America, Europe, and Africa. Planned follow-up periods ranged from six months to five years. The studies were reported poorly, which limited our ability to judge risk of bias for many domains. None of the studies explicitly masked outcome assessment. We rated seven studies at high risk of detection bias. Low-certainty of evidence from five studies showed that using the Ex-PRESS plus trabeculectomy compared with standard trabeculectomy may be associated with a slightly lower IOP at one year (mean difference (MD) -1.76 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.81 to -0.70; 213 eyes). Moderate-certainty of evidence from one study showed that using the PreserFlo MicroShunt may be associated with a slightly higher IOP than standard trabeculectomy at one year (MD 3.20 mmHg, 95% CI 2.29 to 4.11). Participants who received standard trabeculectomy may have a higher risk of hypotony compared with those who received device-modified trabeculectomy, but the evidence is uncertain (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.17; I² = 38%; P = 0.14). In the subgroup of participants who received the PreserFlo MicroShunt, there was a lower risk of developing hypotony or shallow anterior chamber compared with those receiving standard trabeculectomy (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.79; 526 eyes). Device-modified trabeculectomy may lead to less subsequent cataract surgery within one year (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.80; I² = 0%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Use of an Ex-PRESS plus trabeculectomy may produce greater IOP reduction at one-year follow-up than standard trabeculectomy; however, due to potential biases and imprecision in effect estimates, the certainty of evidence is low. PreserFlo MicroShunt may be inferior to standard trabeculectomy in lowering IOP. However, PreserFlo MicroShunt may prevent postoperative hypotony and bleb leakage. Overall, device-modified trabeculectomy appears associated with a lower risk of cataract surgery within five years compared with standard trabeculectomy. Due to various limitations in the design and conduct of the included studies, the applicability of this evidence synthesis to other populations or settings is uncertain. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness and safety of other devices in subgroup populations, such as people with different types of glaucoma, of various races and ethnicity, and with different lens types (e.g. phakic, pseudophakic).

摘要

背景

青光眼是一种视神经病变,可导致视野缺损和视力丧失。它是全球第二大致盲的不可逆病因。青光眼的治疗旨在降低眼内压 (IOP) 以减缓或防止进一步的视力丧失。可以通过药物、激光或切口手术来降低 IOP。小梁切除术是一种通过将房水引流到结膜下的泡来降低 IOP 的手术方法。设备改良的小梁切除术旨在提高这种滤泡形成手术的耐用性和安全性。小梁切除术改良设备包括 Ex-PRESS、XEN 凝胶支架、PreserFlo 微分流器以及 Ologen、羊膜、膨化聚四氟乙烯 (ePTFE) 膜、Gelfilm 等抗纤维化材料。然而,这些设备的比较有效性和安全性尚不确定。

目的

评估与标准小梁切除术相比,不同设备作为小梁切除术的辅助手段对青光眼患者的眼压控制的益处和危害。

检索方法

我们使用标准的、广泛的 Cochrane 检索方法。最新的检索是在 2021 年 8 月进行的。

选择标准

我们纳入了将改良设备与标准小梁切除术进行比较的随机对照试验,这些试验纳入了患有青光眼的参与者。我们纳入了在治疗组中使用抗代谢药物的研究。

数据收集和分析

我们使用了标准的 Cochrane 方法。我们的主要结局是 1. IOP 的变化和 2. 术后一年的平均 IOP。我们的次要结局是 3. 从基线的平均 IOP 变化、4. 任何时间点的平均术后 IOP、5. 平均最佳矫正视力 (BCVA)、6. 视野变化、7. 生活质量、8. 术后一年无滴眼药水的参与者比例、9. 术后一年需要降低 IOP 的药物平均数量以及 10. 并发症的比例。

主要结果

有八项研究符合我们的纳入标准,其中七项是完整的期刊文章,一项是会议摘要。这八项研究共纳入了 961 名患有青光眼的参与者,比较了两种在小梁切除术中植入的设备与标准小梁切除术。其中七项研究(462 只眼,434 名参与者)使用了 Ex-PRESS,一项研究(527 只眼,527 名参与者)使用了 PreserFlo 微分流器。没有研究使用 XEN 凝胶支架符合我们的标准。这些研究在北美、欧洲和非洲进行。计划的随访时间从六个月到五年不等。研究报告得很差,这限制了我们对许多领域的偏倚风险进行判断的能力。没有研究明确地对结果评估进行盲法。我们将七个研究评为高度偏倚风险。来自五项研究的低确定性证据表明,与标准小梁切除术相比,使用 Ex-PRESS 加小梁切除术可能会使术后一年的眼压略低(平均差值 (MD) -1.76mmHg,95%置信区间 (CI) -2.81 至 -0.70;213 只眼)。一项研究的中度确定性证据表明,与标准小梁切除术相比,使用 PreserFlo 微分流器可能会使术后一年的眼压略高(MD 3.20mmHg,95%CI 2.29 至 4.11)。接受标准小梁切除术的参与者可能比接受改良小梁切除术的参与者更容易出现低眼压,但证据不确定(RR 0.73,95%CI 0.46 至 1.17;I² = 38%;P = 0.14)。在接受 PreserFlo 微分流器的参与者亚组中,与接受标准小梁切除术的参与者相比,发生低眼压或浅前房的风险较低(RR 0.44,95%CI 0.25 至 0.79;526 只眼)。改良小梁切除术可能会导致术后一年内需要再次进行白内障手术的风险降低(RR 0.46,95%CI 0.27 至 0.80;I² = 0%)。

作者结论

与标准小梁切除术相比,使用 Ex-PRESS 加小梁切除术可能会在术后一年时产生更大的眼压降低效果;然而,由于潜在的偏倚和效应估计的不准确性,证据的确定性较低。PreserFlo 微分流器可能不如标准小梁切除术能降低眼压。然而,PreserFlo 微分流器可能可以预防术后低眼压和滤泡渗漏。总体而言,与标准小梁切除术相比,改良小梁切除术在五年内似乎与白内障手术的风险降低相关。由于纳入研究在设计和实施方面存在各种局限性,因此本证据综合对其他人群或环境的适用性尚不确定。需要进一步研究以确定其他设备在亚组人群中的有效性和安全性,例如不同类型的青光眼、不同种族和民族以及不同晶状体类型(如有晶状体、无晶状体)的人群。

相似文献

1
Device-modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma.器械改良小梁切除术治疗青光眼。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 13;3(3):CD010472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010472.pub3.
3
Aqueous shunts for glaucoma.用于青光眼的房水引流装置
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 28;7(7):CD004918. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004918.pub3.
4
Laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.激光小梁成形术治疗开角型青光眼和高眼压症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 9;8(8):CD003919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003919.pub3.
6
Device-modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma.用于青光眼的设备改良小梁切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 1;2015(12):CD010472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010472.pub2.
10
Cyclodestructive procedures for non-refractory glaucoma.非难治性青光眼的睫状体破坏手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;4(4):CD009313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009313.pub2.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验