Marston William A, Chinubhai Abha, Kao Stephen, Kalbaugh Corey, Kouri Ana
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Veniti Inc, Fremont, Calif.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Jan;4(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
Obstruction of the iliocaval venous outflow tract is a common cause of acute and chronic venous symptoms. Percutaneous stenting is now frequently performed to alleviate obstruction in the central venous system. However, currently used stents were primarily designed for biliary or arterial indications and may not be optimal for use in the venous system. This study evaluated the safety and performance of a novel venous stent (NVS) designed specifically for venous applications in an in vivo venous animal model.
The study evaluated vascular response and safety of the NVS compared with the Wallstent Stent (WS; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass) at baseline, 56, and 180 days in adult sheep. Four sheep received a single NVS in the iliac vein for acute evaluation, and eight underwent bilateral iliac vein stenting using a single NVS on one side and a single WS on the other for longer-term follow-up. Fluoroscopy and intravascular ultrasound imaging were performed at implantation to identify iliac vein diameters at baseline and again at 56 and 180 days. Both iliac veins from all 56-day and 180-day animals (n = 16) underwent histologic examination. Three sections from each vessel were reviewed for intimal strut coverage, luminal thickening, thrombus, and evidence of venous injury. Student t-tests were used to compare mean iliac vein diameters for the WS and the NVS.
Stent placement of the NVS and WS was successful to within 5 mm of the preselected location in all animals. During follow-up, no clinical evidence of stent thrombosis or obstruction >50% occurred in any limb. Sections of the stented vein at 56 and 180 days exhibited complete or nearly complete endothelial cell coverage, no or minimal luminal thrombus, and virtually complete neointimal coverage of every strut. The WS and NVS both caused an increase in iliac vein diameters immediately after stenting. At 180 days, there was no difference in iliac vein diameter or the percentage change in diameter compared with diameters immediately after stenting as measured by venography and intravascular ultrasound.
In an ovine iliac vein model, a new NVS studied to 180 days was free of thrombotic complications and significant luminal stenosis. These data support clinical evaluation of this NVS in appropriately designed human clinical trials.
髂股静脉流出道梗阻是急慢性静脉症状的常见原因。目前经皮支架置入术常用于缓解中心静脉系统的梗阻。然而,目前使用的支架主要是为胆道或动脉适应症设计的,可能并非最适合用于静脉系统。本研究在体内静脉动物模型中评估了一种专门为静脉应用设计的新型静脉支架(NVS)的安全性和性能。
本研究在成年绵羊中,于基线、56天和180天时评估了NVS与Wallstent支架(WS;波士顿科学公司,马尔伯勒,马萨诸塞州)相比的血管反应和安全性。4只绵羊在髂静脉接受单个NVS用于急性评估,8只绵羊双侧髂静脉支架置入,一侧使用单个NVS,另一侧使用单个WS用于长期随访。在植入时进行荧光透视和血管内超声成像,以确定基线时以及56天和180天时的髂静脉直径。对所有56天和180天动物(n = 16)的双侧髂静脉进行组织学检查。对每个血管的三个切片进行检查,以评估内膜支柱覆盖情况、管腔增厚、血栓形成以及静脉损伤的证据。使用学生t检验比较WS和NVS的平均髂静脉直径。
在所有动物中,NVS和WS的支架置入均成功到达预选位置的5毫米范围内。在随访期间,任何肢体均未出现支架血栓形成或梗阻>50%的临床证据。在56天和180天时,置入支架的静脉切片显示内皮细胞完全或几乎完全覆盖,无或仅有极少的管腔内血栓形成,并且几乎每个支柱都有完整的新生内膜覆盖。WS和NVS在支架置入后立即均导致髂静脉直径增加。在180天时,通过静脉造影和血管内超声测量,与支架置入后立即测量的直径相比,髂静脉直径或直径变化百分比无差异。
在绵羊髂静脉模型中,研究至180天的新型NVS无血栓形成并发症和明显的管腔狭窄。这些数据支持在适当设计的人体临床试验中对该NVS进行临床评估。