Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene,OR 97403.
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e29. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000655.
In our response to the 27 commentaries, we refine the theoretical claims, clarify several misconceptions of our framework, and explore substantial disagreements. In doing so, we (1) show that our framework accommodates multiple historical scenarios; (2) debate the historical evidence, particularly about "pre-Axial" religions; (3) offer important details about cultural evolutionary theory; (4) clarify the term prosociality; and (4) discuss proximal mechanisms. We review many interesting extensions, amplifications, and qualifications of our approach made by the commentators.
在对 27 条评论的回应中,我们完善了理论主张,澄清了我们框架的几个误解,并探讨了实质性分歧。在这样做的过程中,我们 (1) 表明我们的框架可以容纳多种历史情况;(2) 对历史证据进行辩论,特别是关于“轴心前”宗教的证据;(3) 提供有关文化进化理论的重要细节;(4) 澄清亲社会性一词;(4) 讨论近端机制。我们回顾了评论者对我们方法提出的许多有趣的扩展、放大和限定。