Wagner Scott C, Formby Peter M, Kang Daniel G, Van Blarcum Gregory S, Cody John P, Tracey Robert W, Lehman Ronald A
Department of Orthopaedics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040 Jackson Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA.
Spine J. 2016 Jul;16(7):851-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.043. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
There is very little literature examining optimal radiographic parameters for placement of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), nor is there substantial evidence evaluating the relationship between persistent postoperative neck pain and radiographic outcomes.
We set out to perform a single-center evaluation of the radiographic outcomes, including associated complications, of CDA.
This is a retrospective review.
Two hundred eighty-five consecutive patients undergoing CDA were included in the review.
The outcome measures were radiological parameters (preoperative facet arthrosis, disc height, CDA placement in sagittal and coronal planes, heterotopic ossification [HO] formation, etc.) and patient outcomes (persistent pain, recurrent pain, new-onset pain, etc.).
We performed a retrospective review of all patients from a single military tertiary medical center from August 2008 to August 2012 undergoing CDA. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up films were evaluated. The clinical outcomes and complications associated with the procedure were also examined.
The average radiographic follow-up was 13.5 months and the rate of persistent axial neck pain was 17.2%. For patients with persistent neck pain, the rate of HO formation per level studied was 22.6%, whereas the rate was significantly lower for patients without neck pain (11.7%, p=.03). There was no significant association between the severity of HO and the presence of neck pain. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of cervicalgia, compared to those without cervicalgia, were significantly more likely to experience continued neck pain postoperatively (28.6% vs. 13.1%, p=.01). There were no differences in preoperative facet arthrosis, pre- or postoperative disc height, segmental range of motion, or placement of the device relative to the posterior edge of the vertebral body.However, patients with implants more centered between the uncovertebral joints were more likely to experience posterior neck pain (p=.03).
We found that posterior axial neck pain is relatively frequent after CDA, and patients with persistent neck pain were significantly more likely to have preoperative cervicalgia and develop HO postoperatively. We also found that patients with implants that were placed off-centered were less likely to also complain of neck pain, although the reasons for this finding remain unclear.
目前很少有文献研究颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)置入的最佳影像学参数,也没有大量证据评估术后持续性颈部疼痛与影像学结果之间的关系。
我们着手对CDA的影像学结果(包括相关并发症)进行单中心评估。
这是一项回顾性研究。
本回顾性研究纳入了285例连续接受CDA的患者。
观察指标为放射学参数(术前小关节骨关节炎、椎间盘高度、CDA在矢状面和冠状面的置入情况、异位骨化[HO]形成等)和患者结局(持续性疼痛、复发性疼痛、新发疼痛等)。
我们对2008年8月至2012年8月期间在一家军队三级医疗中心接受CDA的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。评估术前、术后即刻和最终随访的影像学资料。还检查了与该手术相关的临床结局和并发症。
影像学平均随访时间为13.5个月,持续性轴性颈部疼痛发生率为17.2%。对于持续性颈部疼痛的患者,每个研究节段的HO形成率为22.6%,而无颈部疼痛的患者该率显著较低(11.7%,p = 0.03)。HO的严重程度与颈部疼痛的存在之间无显著关联。术前诊断为颈椎病的患者与未患颈椎病的患者相比,术后更有可能持续存在颈部疼痛(28.6%对13.1%,p = 0.01)。术前小关节骨关节炎、术前或术后椎间盘高度、节段活动度或植入物相对于椎体后缘的位置无差异。然而,植入物在钩椎关节之间更居中的患者更有可能出现后颈部疼痛(p = 0.03)。
我们发现CDA术后轴性后颈部疼痛相对常见,持续性颈部疼痛的患者术前患颈椎病且术后发生HO的可能性显著更高。我们还发现植入物位置偏心的患者抱怨颈部疼痛的可能性较小,尽管这一发现的原因尚不清楚。