Li Jia, Qin Shuhui, Li Yongqian, Shen Yong
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Peoples Republic of China.
The Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.
J Pain Res. 2017 Aug 24;10:2041-2045. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144814. eCollection 2017.
The purpose of the research was to evaluate cervical sagittal parameters on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with Modic changes and its impact on axial neck pain.
This study consisted of 266 consecutive asymptomatic or symptomatic patients with Modic changes, whose average age was 50.9±12.6 years from January 2015 to December 2016. Cervical sagittal parameters included sagittal alignment of the cervical spine (SACS), T1 slope, thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and neck tilt (NT). The Modic changes group was compared with an asymptomatic control group of 338 age- and gender-matched adults.
In the Modic changes group, T1 slope was significantly higher (25.8°±6.3°) compared with that in the control group (22.5°±6.8°) (=0.000). However, there was no significant difference of the NT, TIA, and SACS between the two groups. Patients in the Modic changes group were more likely to have experienced historical axial neck pain compared with the control group (=0.000). With regard to the disc degeneration, it indicated that the disc in the Modic changes group had more severe disc degeneration (=0.032).
T1 slope in the Modic changes group was significantly higher compared to that of the control group. The findings suggested that a higher T1 slope with broken compensation of cervical sagittal mechanism may be associated with the development of Modic changes in the cervical spine.
本研究旨在评估存在Modic改变的患者颈椎矢状面参数在磁共振成像(MRI)上的表现及其对颈部轴向疼痛的影响。
本研究纳入了2015年1月至2016年12月期间连续的266例有或无Modic改变的无症状或有症状患者,平均年龄为50.9±12.6岁。颈椎矢状面参数包括颈椎矢状位排列(SACS)、T1斜率、胸廓入口角(TIA)和颈部倾斜度(NT)。将Modic改变组与338例年龄和性别匹配的无症状对照组成年人进行比较。
在Modic改变组中,T1斜率(25.8°±6.3°)显著高于对照组(22.5°±6.8°)(P=0.000)。然而,两组之间的NT、TIA和SACS无显著差异。与对照组相比,Modic改变组患者既往发生颈部轴向疼痛的可能性更高(P=0.000)。关于椎间盘退变,结果表明Modic改变组的椎间盘退变更严重(P=0.032)。
Modic改变组的T1斜率显著高于对照组。研究结果提示,T1斜率较高且颈椎矢状面机制代偿破坏可能与颈椎Modic改变的发生有关。