Kimura Shuhei, Morizane Yuki, Toshima Shinji, Hosogi Mika, Kumase Fumiaki, Hosokawa Mio, Shiode Yusuke, Fujiwara Atsushi, Shiraga Fumio
Department of Ophthalmology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama City, 7008558, Japan.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;254(9):1731-6. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3314-1. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
We assessed the efficacy of vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, followed by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, anti-VEGF-resistant age-related macular degeneration (AMD) due to vitreomacular traction (VMT) or epiretinal membrane (ERM).
We identified six patients with anti-VEGF-resistant AMD due to VMT or ERM amongst a total of 588 patients with AMD (821 eyes) referred to Okayama University Hospital between February 2012 and May 2014. These patients underwent vitrectomy to release the VMT (4 cases) or remove the ERM (2 cases), along with ILM peeling. The regimen used for intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF reagents after surgery was based on the severity of exudative changes in each patient. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) measurements were compared.
After vitrectomy and ILM peeling, all six patients responded to anti-VEGF therapy, which was then able to maintain dry retinas. Mean BCVA did not improve significantly (0.49 ± 0.28 before vs. 0.43 ± 0.38 after surgery, P = 0.538). However, mean CR was significantly decreased after surgery, from 423 ± 83.5 μm to 257 ± 75.8 μm (P = 0.0078).
Vitrectomy and ILM peeling followed by anti-VEGF therapy may be a useful therapeutic option for anti-VEGF-resistant AMD with VMT or ERM.
我们评估了玻璃体切除术联合内界膜(ILM)剥除术,随后进行抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗,对因玻璃体黄斑牵引(VMT)或视网膜前膜(ERM)导致的抗VEGF治疗抵抗的年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的疗效。
在2012年2月至2014年5月转诊至冈山大学医院的总共588例AMD患者(821只眼)中,我们确定了6例因VMT或ERM导致的抗VEGF治疗抵抗的AMD患者。这些患者接受了玻璃体切除术以解除VMT(4例)或切除ERM(2例),同时进行ILM剥除术。术后玻璃体内注射抗VEGF试剂的方案根据每位患者渗出性改变的严重程度而定。比较术前和术后的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心视网膜厚度(CRT)测量值。
玻璃体切除术和ILM剥除术后,所有6例患者对抗VEGF治疗均有反应,随后能够维持视网膜干燥。平均BCVA没有显著改善(术前为0.49±0.28,术后为0.43±0.38,P = 0.538)。然而,术后平均CRT显著降低,从423±83.5μm降至257±75.8μm(P = 0.0078)。
玻璃体切除术联合ILM剥除术,随后进行抗VEGF治疗,可能是治疗因VMT或ERM导致的抗VEGF治疗抵抗的AMD的一种有用的治疗选择。