Suppr超能文献

玻璃体切除术及内界膜剥除术治疗抗血管内皮生长因子治疗抵抗的、伴有玻璃体黄斑牵拉或视网膜前膜的年龄相关性黄斑变性的疗效

Efficacy of vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane peeling in age-related macular degeneration resistant to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, with vitreomacular traction or epiretinal membrane.

作者信息

Kimura Shuhei, Morizane Yuki, Toshima Shinji, Hosogi Mika, Kumase Fumiaki, Hosokawa Mio, Shiode Yusuke, Fujiwara Atsushi, Shiraga Fumio

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama City, 7008558, Japan.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;254(9):1731-6. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3314-1. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed the efficacy of vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, followed by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, anti-VEGF-resistant age-related macular degeneration (AMD) due to vitreomacular traction (VMT) or epiretinal membrane (ERM).

METHODS

We identified six patients with anti-VEGF-resistant AMD due to VMT or ERM amongst a total of 588 patients with AMD (821 eyes) referred to Okayama University Hospital between February 2012 and May 2014. These patients underwent vitrectomy to release the VMT (4 cases) or remove the ERM (2 cases), along with ILM peeling. The regimen used for intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF reagents after surgery was based on the severity of exudative changes in each patient. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) measurements were compared.

RESULTS

After vitrectomy and ILM peeling, all six patients responded to anti-VEGF therapy, which was then able to maintain dry retinas. Mean BCVA did not improve significantly (0.49 ± 0.28 before vs. 0.43 ± 0.38 after surgery, P = 0.538). However, mean CR was significantly decreased after surgery, from 423 ± 83.5 μm to 257 ± 75.8 μm (P = 0.0078).

CONCLUSIONS

Vitrectomy and ILM peeling followed by anti-VEGF therapy may be a useful therapeutic option for anti-VEGF-resistant AMD with VMT or ERM.

摘要

目的

我们评估了玻璃体切除术联合内界膜(ILM)剥除术,随后进行抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗,对因玻璃体黄斑牵引(VMT)或视网膜前膜(ERM)导致的抗VEGF治疗抵抗的年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的疗效。

方法

在2012年2月至2014年5月转诊至冈山大学医院的总共588例AMD患者(821只眼)中,我们确定了6例因VMT或ERM导致的抗VEGF治疗抵抗的AMD患者。这些患者接受了玻璃体切除术以解除VMT(4例)或切除ERM(2例),同时进行ILM剥除术。术后玻璃体内注射抗VEGF试剂的方案根据每位患者渗出性改变的严重程度而定。比较术前和术后的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心视网膜厚度(CRT)测量值。

结果

玻璃体切除术和ILM剥除术后,所有6例患者对抗VEGF治疗均有反应,随后能够维持视网膜干燥。平均BCVA没有显著改善(术前为0.49±0.28,术后为0.43±0.38,P = 0.538)。然而,术后平均CRT显著降低,从423±83.5μm降至257±75.8μm(P = 0.0078)。

结论

玻璃体切除术联合ILM剥除术,随后进行抗VEGF治疗,可能是治疗因VMT或ERM导致的抗VEGF治疗抵抗的AMD的一种有用的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验