Suppr超能文献

监测内镜再处理效果的实用工具包:识别胃镜、结肠镜和支气管镜上的活菌

Practical toolkit for monitoring endoscope reprocessing effectiveness: Identification of viable bacteria on gastroscopes, colonoscopes, and bronchoscopes.

作者信息

Ofstead Cori L, Doyle Evan M, Eiland John E, Amelang Miriam R, Wetzler Harry P, England Dawn M, Mascotti Kristin M, Shaw Michael J

机构信息

Ofstead & Associates, Inc, St Paul, MN.

Department of Infection Prevention, University of Minnesota Health, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jul 1;44(7):815-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Experts have recommended microbiologic surveillance by external reference laboratories for certain flexible endoscopes. There is currently insufficient evidence on the feasibility and utility of cultures. Researchers evaluated a preassembled toolkit for collecting and processing samples from endoscopes.

METHODS

A pilot study was performed in a large academic medical center. A toolkit was used to aseptically sample biopsy ports and suction/biopsy channels of 5 gastroscopes, 5 colonoscopes, and 5 bronchoscopes after full reprocessing. Blinded specimens were packaged and transported on icepacks to a reference laboratory that used standard methodologies for microbial cultures.

RESULTS

The laboratory detected bacteria in samples from 60% of patient-ready endoscopes, including gram-positive and gram-negative species. Viable microbes (<10 CFU) were recovered from 2 gastroscopes, 3 colonoscopes, and 4 bronchoscopes. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Delftia acidovorans were recovered from all 3 endoscope types. Subsequent environmental testing detected S maltophilia in the reprocessing rinse water.

CONCLUSIONS

A preassembled toolkit facilitated the aseptic collection of samples for culturing by a reference laboratory that detected viable microbes on fully reprocessed endoscopes. Speciation allowed identification of potential pathogens and a possible common contamination source, demonstrating that microbial cultures may have value even when colony counts are low.

摘要

背景

专家建议由外部参考实验室对某些软性内窥镜进行微生物监测。目前关于培养的可行性和实用性的证据不足。研究人员评估了一种用于从内窥镜采集和处理样本的预组装工具包。

方法

在一家大型学术医疗中心进行了一项试点研究。在对5台胃镜、5台结肠镜和5台支气管镜进行全面再处理后,使用工具包对活检孔道和吸引/活检通道进行无菌采样。将盲法标本包装后用冰袋运至一家参考实验室,该实验室采用标准方法进行微生物培养。

结果

实验室在60%已准备好供患者使用的内窥镜样本中检测到细菌,包括革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌。从2台胃镜、3台结肠镜和4台支气管镜中培养出了活菌(<10 CFU)。嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌和食酸代尔夫特菌在所有三种内窥镜类型中均被培养出。随后的环境检测在再处理冲洗水中检测到嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌。

结论

一个预组装工具包便于参考实验室无菌采集样本进行培养,该实验室在完全再处理后的内窥镜上检测到了活菌。菌种鉴定有助于识别潜在病原体和可能的共同污染源,表明即使菌落计数较低,微生物培养也可能具有价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验